Skip to main content

Student–Teacher Relationships: The Elephant in the Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning ((IAKM,volume 8))

Abstract

Teaching is a deeply subjective and relational activity; although often assumed to rest exclusively on effective instrumental practices, teaching’s success resides predominantly in the ability of the teacher to foster and engage reciprocating authentic connections with students. The import of teacher–student relationships is the central focus of this chapter. It explores the complexities that confound and confront student/teacher relationships and what is known empirically about its impact on learning and introduces key theoretical frameworks and core constructs used to make sense of this phenomenon. Discussed is the connection between knowledge management in the classroom and teacher–student relationships. The chapter ends with a discussion of strategies that can foster successful teacher–student relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayers, A. J. (2009). The right to be true. In R. Neta & D. Pritchard (Eds.), Arguing about knowledge (pp. 11–13). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (1998). Critically reflective practice. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 18, 197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. M. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551505057016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P. (2006). Not making or shaping: Finding authenticity in faculty development. To Improve the Academy, 24(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2334-4822.2006.tb00451.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranton, P., & Carusetta, E. (2004). Perspectives on authenticity in teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 55, 5), 5–5),22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713604268894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creasey, G., Jarvis, P., & Knapcik, E. (2009). A measure to assess student-instructor relationships. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2009.030214.

  • Docan-Morgan, T. (2011). “Everything changed”: Relational turning point events in college teacher-student relationships from teachers’ perspectives. Communication Education, 60(1), 20–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2010.497223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docan-Morgan, T., & Manusov, V. (2009). Relational turning point events and their outcomes in college teacher-student relationships from students’ perspectives. Communication Education, 58(2), 155–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520802515713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ei, S., & Bowen, A. (2016). College students’ perceptions of student-instructor relationships. Ethics and Behavior, 12(2), 177–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2000). The teacher-student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520009379209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenauer, G., Gläser-Zikuda, M., & Volet, S. (2016). University teachers’ perceptions of appropriate emotion display and high-quality teacher-student relationship: Similarities and differences across cultural-educational contexts. Frontline Learning Research, 4(3), 44–74. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v4i2.236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenauer, G., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Teacher–student relationship at university: An important yet under-researched field. Oxford Review of Education, 4985(November 2015), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2014.921613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haidet, P., & Stein, H. F. (2006). The role of the student-teacher relationship in the formation of physicians: The hidden curriculum as process. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(Suppl. 1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00304.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2013). Reframing teaching relationships: From student-centred to subject-centred learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(7), 773–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2013.836095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosek, A. M., & Presley, R. (2018). College student perceptions of the (in)appropriateness and functions of teacher disclosure. College Teaching, 66(2), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/87567555.2017.1385587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, P. (2003). Designing more effective on-campus teaching and learning spaces: A role for academic developers. International Journal of Academic Development, 8, 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. V. (2017). Relational–cultural theory: The power of connection to transform our lives. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 56(3), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/johc.12055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. V., Hartling, L. M., & Walker, M. (Eds.). (2004). The complexity of connection: Writings from the Stone Center’s Jean Baker Miller Training Institute. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karpouza, E., & Emvalotis, A. (2018). Exploring the teacher-student relationship in graduate education: A constructivist grounded theory. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1468319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, J., Smith, D., & Buskist, W. (2006). The teacher behaviors checklist: Factor analysis of its utility for evaluating teaching. Teaching of Psychology, 33(2), 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. K., & Sax, L. J. (2009). Student-faculty interaction in research universities: Differences by student gender, race, social class, and first-generation status. Research in Higher Education, 50(5), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-009-9127-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1986). What do we mean by relationships? Work in progress, no. 22. Working paper series. Wellesley, MA: Stone Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. B. (1988). Connections, disconnections, and violations. Work in progress, no. 33. Working paper series. Wellesley, MA: Stone Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. N., Katt, J. A., Brown, T., & Sivo, S. A. (2014). The relationship of instructor self-disclosure, nonverbal immediacy, and credibility to student incivility in the college classroom. Communication Education, 63(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2013.835054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, M., & Brown, T. (2012). Learning as relational: Intersubjectivity and pedagogy in higher education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 31(5), 643–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2012.700648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, D. J., & Larson, J. B. (2015). Don’t forget about the body: Exploring the curricular possibilities of embodied pedagogy. Innovations in Higher Education, 40(4), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-015-9319-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T. (1980). Student–faculty informal contact and college outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 50(4), 545–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students (volume 2): A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, K. M. (2016). How higher education feels. Boston, MA: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Mottet, T. (2006). Student incivility and resistance in the classroom. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), In the handbook of instructional communication (pp. 235–252). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M., & McCullough, B. C. (1981). Mattering: Inferred significance and mental health among adolescents. Research in Community and Mental Health, 2, 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R., & Hepworth, J. (1990). AAMFT ethical code: “Dual relationships”. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16(2), 127–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H. L. 2013. “Dinner at Fitzwilly’s: Intellectual mattering in developmental relationships.” In Sixth annual mentoring conference proceedings: Impact and effectiveness of developmental relationship, edited by N. Dominguez and Y. Gandert. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267694513_Dinner_at_Fitzwilly’s_Intellectual_Mattering_in_Developmental_Relationships

  • Seidel, S. B., & Tanner, K. D. (2013). “What if students revolt?”—Considering student resistance: Origins, options, and opportunities for investigation. CBE Life Sciences Education, 12, 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-13-09-0190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidorkin, A. (2002). Learning relations. Impure education, deschooled schools and dialogue with evil. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., & Thijs, J. T. (2011). Teacher wellbeing: The importance of teacher-student relationships. Educational Psychology Review, 23(4), 457–477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9170-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strayhorn, T. (2016). Transition to higher education—In search of belonging. In K. M. Quinlan (Ed.), How higher education feels (pp. 23–52). Amsterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. E., & Wheatley, K. F. (2003). Teachers’ emotions and teaching: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 327–358. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026131715856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J., & Turner, R. J. (2019). A longitudinal study of the role and significance of mattering to others for depressive symptoms. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(3), 310–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiberius, R. G., Sinai, J., & Flak, E. A. (2002). The role of teacher-learner relationships in medical education. In International handbook of research in medical education (pp. 463–497). Great Britain: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Titsworth, B. S. (2001). Immediate and delayed effects of interest cues and engagement cues on students’ affective learning. Communication Studies, 52(3), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/1051097010938855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Titsworth, S., & Mazer, J. P. (2010). Clarity in teaching and learning: Conundrums, consequences and opportunities. In D. L. Fassett & J. T. Warren (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of communication and instruction (pp. 241–262). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching and transformative learning. In E. W. Taylor & P. Cranton (Eds.), Handbook of transformative learning: Theory, research and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward W. Taylor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Taylor, E.W. (2019). Student–Teacher Relationships: The Elephant in the Classroom. In: Fedeli, M., Bierema, L.L. (eds) Connecting Adult Learning and Knowledge Management. Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29872-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29872-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29871-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29872-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics