Skip to main content

Clustering-Based Ensemble Pruning and Multistage Organization Using Diversity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems (HAIS 2019)

Abstract

The purpose of ensemble pruning is to reduce the number of predictive models in order to improve efficiency and predictive performance of the ensemble. In clustering-based approach, we are looking for groups of similar models, and then we prune each of them separately in order to increase overall diversity of the ensemble. In this paper we propose two methods for this purpose using classifier clustering on the basis of a criterion based on diversity measure. In the first method we select from each cluster the model with the best predictive performance to form the final ensemble, while the second one employs the multistage organization, where instead of removing the classifiers from the ensemble each classifier group makes the decision independently. The final answer of the proposed framework is the result of the majority voting of the decisions returned by each group. Experimentation results validated through statistical tests confirmed the usefulness of the proposed approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bakker, B., Heskes, T.: Clustering ensembles of neural network models. Neural Netw. 16(2), 261–269 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fu, Q., Hu, S.X., Zhao, S.: Clustering-based selective neural network ensemble. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. 6(5), 387–392 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giacinto, G., Roli, F., Fumera, G.: Design of effective multiple classifier systems by clustering of classifiers. In: 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ho, T.K.: The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 20, 832–844 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ho, T.K., Hull, J.J., Srihari, S.N.: Decision combination in multiple classifier systems. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 16(1), 66–75 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kohavi, R., Wolpert, D.: Bias plus variance decomposition for zero-one loss functions. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 1996, pp. 275–283. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krawczyk, B., Cyganek, B.: Selecting locally specialised classifiers for one-class classification ensembles. Pattern Anal. Appl. 20(2), 427–439 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Krawczyk, B., Minku, L.L., Gama, J., Stefanowski, J., Wozniak, M.: Ensemble learning for data stream analysis: a survey. Inf. Fusion 37, 132–156 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kuncheva, L.I.: Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms. Wiley, Hoboken (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Lazarevic, A., Obradovic, Z.: The effective pruning of neural network classifiers. In: 2001 IEEE/INNS International Conference on Neural Networks, IJCNN 2001 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pedregosa, F., et al.: Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ruta, D., Gabrys, B.: A theoretical analysis of the limits of majority voting errors for multiple classifier systems. Pattern Anal. Appl. 2(4), 333–350 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Topolski, M.: Algorithm of principal component analysis PCA with fuzzy observation of facility features detection of carcinoma cells multiple myeloma. In: Burduk, R., Kurzynski, M., Wozniak, M. (eds.) Progress in Computer Recognition Systems (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Woźniak, M., Graña, M.: A survey of multiple classifier systems as hybrid systems. Inf. Fusion 16, 3–17 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, H., Cao, L.: A spectral clustering based ensemble pruning approach. Neurocomputing 139, 289–297 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, Z.H.: Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms. Chapman & Hall CRC, Boca Raton (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Polish National Science Centre under the grant No. 2017/27/B/ST6/01325 as well as by the statutory funds of the Department of Systems and Computer Networks, Faculty of Electronics, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paweł Zyblewski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zyblewski, P., Woźniak, M. (2019). Clustering-Based Ensemble Pruning and Multistage Organization Using Diversity. In: Pérez García, H., Sánchez González, L., Castejón Limas, M., Quintián Pardo, H., Corchado Rodríguez, E. (eds) Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. HAIS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11734. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29859-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29859-3_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29858-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29859-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics