Skip to main content

Toward the Evaluation of Case Base Maintenance Policies Under the Belief Function Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty (ECSQARU 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11726))

Abstract

The life cycle of Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) systems implies the maintenance of their knowledge containers for reasons of efficiency and competence. However, two main issues occur. First, knowledge within such systems is full of uncertainty and imprecision since they involve real-world experiences. Second, it is not obvious to choose from the wealth of maintenance policies, available in the literature, the most adequate one to preserve the competence towards problems’ solving. In fact, this competence is so difficult to be actually estimated due to the diversity of influencing factors within CBR systems. For that reasons, we propose, in this work, an entire evaluating process that allows to assess Case Base Maintenance (CBM) policies using information coming from both a statistical measure and a competence model under the belief function theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The factors identified with a star (\( ^{*} \)) are taken into account in the current work.

  2. 2.

    The (k-NN) classifier is the most used within the CBR community.

  3. 3.

    https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/.

  4. 4.

    Forthcoming research work will carry out with other evaluation criteria.

References

  1. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. In: Artificial Intelligence Communications, pp. 39–52 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leake, D.B., Wilson, D.C.: Categorizing case-base maintenance: dimensions and directions. In: Smyth, B., Cunningham, P. (eds.) EWCBR 1998. LNCS, vol. 1488, pp. 196–207. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056333

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Smyth, B., McKenna, E.: Modelling the competence of case-bases. In: Smyth, B., Cunningham, P. (eds.) EWCBR 1998. LNCS, vol. 1488, pp. 208–220. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0056334

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Juarez, J.M., Craw, S., Lopez-Delgado, J.R., Campos, M.: Maintenance of case bases: current algorithms after fifty years. In: proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 5458–5463 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smiti, A., Elouedi, Z.: Overview of maintenance for case based reasoning systems. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 32, 49–56 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ben Ayed, S., Elouedi, Z., Lefevre, E.: ECTD: evidential clustering and case types detection for case base maintenance. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), pp. 1462–1469. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ben Ayed, S., Elouedi, Z., Lefevre, E.: Exploiting domain-experts knowledge within an evidential process for case base maintenance. In: Destercke, S., Denoeux, T., Cuzzolin, F., Martin, A. (eds.) BELIEF 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11069, pp. 22–30. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99383-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Smiti, A., Elouedi, Z.: SCBM: soft case base maintenance method based on competence model. Int. J. Comput. Sci. 25, 221–227 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lupiani, E., Juarez, J.M., Palma, J.: Evaluating case-base maintenance algorithms. Knowl.-Based Syst. 67, 180–194 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chebel-Morello, B., Haouchine, M.K., Zerhouni, N.: Case-based maintenance: structuring and incrementing the case base. Knowl.-Based Syst. 88, 165–183 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hart, P.: The condensed nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 14(3), 515–516 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gates, G.: The reduced nearest neighbor rule. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 18(3), 431–433 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ben Ayed, S., Elouedi, Z., Lefevre, E.: DETD: dynamic policy for case base maintenance based on EK-NNclus algorithm and case types detection. In: Medina, J., Ojeda-Aciego, M., Verdegay, J.L., Pelta, D.A., Cabrera, I.P., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 2018. CCIS, vol. 853, pp. 370–382. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91473-2_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Ben Ayed, S., Elouedi, Z., Lefèvre, E.: CEC-model: a new competence model for CBR systems based on the belief function theory. In: Cox, M.T., Funk, P., Begum, S. (eds.) ICCBR 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11156, pp. 28–44. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01081-2_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Mosqueira-Rey, E., Moret-Bonillo, V.: Validation of intelligent systems: a critical study and a tool. Expert Syst. Appl. 18(1), 1–16 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smyth, B., Keane, M.T.: Remembering to forget: a competence-preserving deletion policy for CBR systems. In: The Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 377–382 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Smiti, A., Elouedi, Z.: Modeling competence for case based reasoning systems using clustering. In: Proceedings of the 26th International FLAIRS Conference, the Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society, pp. 399–404 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dempster, A.P.: Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Ann. Math. Stat. 38, 325–339 (1967)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Shafer, G.: A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Masson, M.H., Denœux, T.: ECM: an evidential version of the fuzzy c-means algorithm. Pattern Recognit. 41(4), 1384–1397 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Antoine, V., Quost, B., Masson, H.M., Denœux, T.: CECM: constrained evidential c-means algorithm. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 56, 894–914 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Jousselme, A.L., Grenier, D., Bossé, E.: A new distance between two bodies of evidence. Inf. Fusion 2(2), 91–101 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Smets, P.: Application of the transferable belief model to diagnostic problems. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 13(2–3), 127–157 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Safa Ben Ayed .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ben Ayed, S., Elouedi, Z., Lefevre, E. (2019). Toward the Evaluation of Case Base Maintenance Policies Under the Belief Function Theory. In: Kern-Isberner, G., Ognjanović, Z. (eds) Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty. ECSQARU 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11726. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29764-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29765-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics