Abstract
Some of the most high profile work that has taken place, especially as it pertains to the accounting subset of the financial services landscape, is the work that has taken place linked to audit and attestation work. The audit process, as currently constituted, is an almost perfect fit for the increased efficiency and automation provided for by a variety of blockchain tools. Audits, and these similarities tend to exist across geographic and firm lines, tend to contain several of the same core components. An engagement letter is composed, outlining the services to be provided by the external audit organization, including but not limited to the testing of certain assets, verification of financial statement amounts, and then the issuance of an opinion based on these amounts. Even with these tests and analyses, some of which may be quite sophisticated in nature, there is a fundamental time lag issue that usually remains unaddressed despite how efficient the audit process is. Put simply, the amount of time that passes between when the data is actually generated or produced, and the time that the audit actually occurs can stretch into months. Even with interim work, or work performed at different times during the year, there is still often a substantial lag between when data (and potential errors) happen, and when that data and potential errors are reported to management. The figure below represents areas in a financial transaction (trading) in which potential audit and attestation implications will arise, and can be aided by the implementation of emerging technologies (Fig. 13.1).
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Alexander, A. (2018). Changing tools, changing roles: Technology is driving the audit of the future. Accounting Today, 32(3), 10–14.
Decker, M. A. (2017). The evolution of the CPA exam. Pennsylvania CPA Journal, 6–9.
Drew, J. (2018). Paving the way to a new digital world. Journal of Accountancy, 225(6), 32–37.
Gale, S. F. (2019). Chain reaction: Blockchain projects are going mainstream. But they must deliver real-world benefits. PM Network, 33(4), 30–41.
Gibson, C. T., & Kirk, T. (2016). Blockchain 101 for asset managers. Investment Lawyer, 23(10), 7–14.
Hood, D. (2018). Brace yourself for AI & blockchain: There’s less threat and more opportunity in emerging technologies than many think. (cover story). Accounting Today, 32(1), –1, 31.
Mahamuni, A. (2019). How to unleash blockchain into your supply chain: Blockchain-based applications provide transparency and visibility throughout the entire supply chain. Material Handling & Logistics, 74(1), 21–24.
McNally, J. S. (2019). Blockchain technology: Answering the whos, whats, and whys. Pennsylvania CPA Journal, 1–6.
Ng, C. (2019). Blockchain in the accounting curriculum. Pennsylvania CPA Journal, 90(1), 14–15.
viniak, V. (2019). Beyond cryptocurrency: blockchain as a value creator & connector. Supply Chain Management Review, 23(1), 26–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stein Smith, S. (2020). Audit Implications of AI & Blockchain. In: Blockchain, Artificial Intelligence and Financial Services. Future of Business and Finance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29761-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29761-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29760-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29761-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)