Skip to main content

Centralized Reasoning Translation and Its Computing Complexity for Heterogeneous Semantic Mappings

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management (KSEM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11775))

  • 2652 Accesses

Abstract

Bridge rules provide an important mechanism for describing semantic mapping and propagating knowledge for distributed dynamic description logics (D3L). The current research focuses on the homogeneous bridge rules that only contain atomic elements. In this paper, the research is extended to the D3L reasoning problem with heterogeneous bridge rules that contain composite elements in subset ends. The regularity of the distributed knowledge base is defined. Through the alteration of the bridge rules and transforming different forms into existing language mechanisms, we present an algorithm that can convert the D3L knowledge base with dynamic description logic \( {\mathcal{DSROIQ}} \) as the local ontology language into a single \( {\mathcal{DSROIQ}} \) knowledge base. Next, we study the properties of the algorithm. We prove that the algorithm will terminate in polynomial time and that the satisfiability of the target knowledge base is equivalent to the satisfiability of the original knowledge base. Thus, we prove that the worst-case time complexity of the centralized reasoning on the regular D3L knowledge base with such bridge rules is the same as that on a single \( {\mathcal{DSROIQ}} \) knowledge base. The method proposed in this paper makes centralized reasoning for D3L obtain the same worst-case time complexity as the existing distributed reasoning method and solves the problem that the latter cannot handle heterogeneous composite bridge rules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lutz, C., Wolter, F.: Deciding inseparability and conservative extensions in the description logic EL. J. Symb. Comput. 45(2), 194–228 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Konev, B., Lutz, C., Walther, D., Wolter, F.: Model-theoretic inseparability and modularity of description logic ontologies. Artif. Intell. 203, 66–103 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Cuenca Grau, B., Parsia, B., Sirin, E.: Ontology integration using ε-connections. In: Stuckenschmidt, H., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S. (eds.) Modular Ontologies. LNCS, vol. 5445, pp. 293–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01907-4_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Mossakowski, T., Kutz, O., Codescu, M.: The distributed ontology, modeling and specification language. In: 7th International Workshop on Modular Ontologies, pp. 1–21. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nalon, C., Kutz, O.: Towards resolution-based reasoning for connected logics. Electron. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 305, 85–102 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, Z.: Distributed Information Retrieval Oriented Automatic Reasoning. Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhao, X., Tian, D., Chen, L., Shi, Z.: Reasoning theory for D3L with compositional bridge rules. In: Shi, Z., Leake, D., Vadera, S. (eds.) IIP 2012. IAICT, vol. 385, pp. 106–115. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32891-6_15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhao, X., Tian, D., Zhang, W., Shi, Z.: Properties and distributed tableaux reasoning algorithm for D3L(ccy). J. Comput. Res. Dev. 51(3), 570–579 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horrocks, I., Kutz, O., Sattler, U.: The even more irresistible \( {\mathcal{SROIQ}} \). In: 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 57–67. AAAI, CA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghidini, C., Serafini, L.: Distributed first order logic. Artif. Intell. 253, 1–39 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Stuckenschmidt, H., Parent, C., Spaccapietra, S.: Modular Ontologies-Concepts. Theories and Techniques for Knowledge Modularization. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01907-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Abbes, S.B., Scheuermann, A., Meilender T.: Characterizing modular ontologies. In: 6th International Workshop on Modular Ontologies, pp. 13–25. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chang, L., Shi, Z., Gu, T., Zhao, L.: A family of dynamic description logics for representing and reasoning about actions. J. Autom. Reasoning 49(1), 1–52 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Staab, S., Studer, R.: Handbook on Ontologies, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaofei Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhao, X., Feng, Z. (2019). Centralized Reasoning Translation and Its Computing Complexity for Heterogeneous Semantic Mappings. In: Douligeris, C., Karagiannis, D., Apostolou, D. (eds) Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11775. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29551-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29551-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29550-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29551-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics