Abstract
Not much is left of the Personal European Pension Product (PEPP) as intended by the European Commission in June 2017. Proposed as a core element of the Capital Markets Union (CMU), the text as agreed between the European Parliament (EP) and the EU Council has become unclear, unattractive and unsuitable. The EP should not have rushed into signing off on an inadequate measure, or the EU Commission would have done well to withdraw the text. Key elements of the proposal were watered down or replaced in response to heavy pressure from member states and certain organisations. It is a classic example of how not to create the capital markets union: protecting national idiosyncrasies and vested interests, and losing out globally at the same time.
Comments from Cosmina Amariei and Ole Stahr are gratefully acknowledged.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
See Lannoo, K. (2018), “Funds, fees and performance”, ECMI Commentary No. 54, July.
- 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lannoo, K. (2019). The Final PEPP or How to Kill an Important EU Commission Proposal. In: da Costa Cabral, N., Cunha Rodrigues, N. (eds) The Future of Pension Plans in the EU Internal Market. Financial and Monetary Policy Studies, vol 48. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29497-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29497-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29496-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29497-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)