Skip to main content

On Teaching and Learning Mathematics – Technologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
STEM Teachers and Teaching in the Digital Era

Abstract

This chapter explores different conceptions of the role of digital technologies in the teaching and learning of mathematics and argues that the common assumption is to treat technologies as mere mediators of already-existing mathematical concepts. It proposes a different conception of the relation between technology and mathematics and suggests that such a re-conceptualisation might lead to effective strategies for better supporting teachers’ use of digital technologies in the classroom. Two examples from ongoing research projects are offered to illustrate these strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Readers are encouraged to interact with the sketch themselves at: http://www.sfu.ca/content/dam/sfu/geometry4yl/sketchpadfiles/Broken%20Block%20Symmetry%202/

  2. 2.

    The gravity mode makes the screen objects fall vertically down the screen and disappear. When the gravity mode is turned off, the screen objects remain on visible until the reset button is pressed.

References

  • Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., & Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments. ZDM, 34(3), 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baccaglini-Frank, A., Di Martino, P., & Sinclair, N. (2018). Elementary school teachers’ implementation of dynamic geometry using model lesson videos. In E. Bergqvist, M. Österholm, C. Granberg, & L. Sumpter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 99–106). Umeå, Sweden: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe Halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, J. E., & Battista, M. (2011). A case study of different learning trajectories for length measurement. In J. Confrey, A. Maloney, & K. Nguyen (Eds.), Learning over time: Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Raleigh, NC: Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artefacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 720–749., 2nd éd). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini-Bussi, M., & Boni, M. (2003). Instruments for semiotic mediation in primary school classrooms. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(2), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind (p. 2000). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843–908). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Châtelet, G. (2000/1993). Les enjeux du mobile. Paris: Seuil [English translation by R. Shore & M. Zagha: Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics, and physics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000].

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, A. (2014). Transitional devices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(2), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coles, A., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Re-thinking place value: From metaphor to metonym. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(1), 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confrey, J. (1994). Splitting, similarity, and the rate of change: A new approach to multiplication and exponential functions. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 293–332). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daro, P., Mosher, P., & Corcoran, T. (2011). Learning trajectories in mathematics: A foundation for standards, curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Available: www.cpre.org.

  • Davis, B., & Renert, M. (2014). The math teachers know: Profound understanding of emergent mathematics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the mathematics classroom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Concepts as generative devices. In E. de Freitas, N. Sinclair, & A. Coles (Eds.), What is a mathematical concept? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A brief history. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jackiw, N., & Sinclair, N. (2014), TouchCounts (iPad App), Tangible Mathematics Group, SFU. https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/touchcounts/id897302197?mt=8

  • Laborde, C. (2001). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with Cabri-geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6, 283–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, UK: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, O., & Sinclair, N. (2015). Young children reasoning about symmetry in a dynamic geometry environment. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 421–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, O., Sinclair, N., & Davis, B. (2018). Drawing off the page: How new 3D technologies provide insight into cognitive and pedagogical assumptions about mathematics. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 15(3), 563–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. (M. Cook, trans.). New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2008). Where are the cultural-historical critiques of “back to the basics”? Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15, 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, B. (2003). Will the digital computer transform classical mathematics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A361, 1675–1690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, B. (2008). Becoming beside ourselves: The alphabet, ghosts, and distributed human beings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K. (2014). Frameworks for analysing the expertise that underpins successful integration of digital technologies into everyday teaching practices. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital age (pp. 373–393). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2008). Constructions of dynamic geometry: A study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. Computers and Education, 51(1), 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Instructional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professional in Berkley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahta, D. (1998). Counting counts. Mathematics Teaching, 163, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 193–204). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathalie Sinclair .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sinclair, N. (2020). On Teaching and Learning Mathematics – Technologies. In: Ben-David Kolikant, Y., Martinovic, D., Milner-Bolotin, M. (eds) STEM Teachers and Teaching in the Digital Era. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29396-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29396-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29395-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29396-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics