Abstract
This chapter explores different conceptions of the role of digital technologies in the teaching and learning of mathematics and argues that the common assumption is to treat technologies as mere mediators of already-existing mathematical concepts. It proposes a different conception of the relation between technology and mathematics and suggests that such a re-conceptualisation might lead to effective strategies for better supporting teachers’ use of digital technologies in the classroom. Two examples from ongoing research projects are offered to illustrate these strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Readers are encouraged to interact with the sketch themselves at: http://www.sfu.ca/content/dam/sfu/geometry4yl/sketchpadfiles/Broken%20Block%20Symmetry%202/
- 2.
The gravity mode makes the screen objects fall vertically down the screen and disappear. When the gravity mode is turned off, the screen objects remain on visible until the reset button is pressed.
References
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245–274.
Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., & Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments. ZDM, 34(3), 66–72.
Baccaglini-Frank, A., Di Martino, P., & Sinclair, N. (2018). Elementary school teachers’ implementation of dynamic geometry using model lesson videos. In E. Bergqvist, M. Österholm, C. Granberg, & L. Sumpter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 99–106). Umeå, Sweden: PME.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe Halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Barrett, J. E., & Battista, M. (2011). A case study of different learning trajectories for length measurement. In J. Confrey, A. Maloney, & K. Nguyen (Eds.), Learning over time: Learning trajectories in mathematics education. Raleigh, NC: Information Age Publishers.
Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artefacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 720–749., 2nd éd). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bartolini-Bussi, M., & Boni, M. (2003). Instruments for semiotic mediation in primary school classrooms. For the Learning of Mathematics, 23(2), 12–19.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind (p. 2000). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843–908). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Châtelet, G. (2000/1993). Les enjeux du mobile. Paris: Seuil [English translation by R. Shore & M. Zagha: Figuring space: Philosophy, mathematics, and physics. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2000].
Coles, A. (2014). Transitional devices. For the Learning of Mathematics, 34(2), 24–30.
Coles, A., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Re-thinking place value: From metaphor to metonym. For the Learning of Mathematics, 37(1), 3–8.
Confrey, J. (1994). Splitting, similarity, and the rate of change: A new approach to multiplication and exponential functions. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 293–332). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Daro, P., Mosher, P., & Corcoran, T. (2011). Learning trajectories in mathematics: A foundation for standards, curriculum, assessment, and instruction. Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Available: www.cpre.org.
Davis, B., & Renert, M. (2014). The math teachers know: Profound understanding of emergent mathematics. New York, NY: Routledge.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the mathematics classroom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2017). Concepts as generative devices. In E. de Freitas, N. Sinclair, & A. Coles (Eds.), What is a mathematical concept? New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Ingold, T. (2007). Lines: A brief history. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Jackiw, N., & Sinclair, N. (2014), TouchCounts (iPad App), Tangible Mathematics Group, SFU. https://itunes.apple.com/ca/app/touchcounts/id897302197?mt=8
Laborde, C. (2001). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with Cabri-geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6, 283–317.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York, UK: Basic Books.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Ng, O., & Sinclair, N. (2015). Young children reasoning about symmetry in a dynamic geometry environment. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(3), 421–434.
Ng, O., Sinclair, N., & Davis, B. (2018). Drawing off the page: How new 3D technologies provide insight into cognitive and pedagogical assumptions about mathematics. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 15(3), 563–578.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. (M. Cook, trans.). New York: Basic Books.
Roth, W.-M. (2008). Where are the cultural-historical critiques of “back to the basics”? Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15, 269–278.
Rotman, B. (2003). Will the digital computer transform classical mathematics? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, A361, 1675–1690.
Rotman, B. (2008). Becoming beside ourselves: The alphabet, ghosts, and distributed human beings. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Ruthven, K. (2014). Frameworks for analysing the expertise that underpins successful integration of digital technologies into everyday teaching practices. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital age (pp. 373–393). New York, NY: Springer.
Ruthven, K., Hennessy, S., & Deaney, R. (2008). Constructions of dynamic geometry: A study of the interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. Computers and Education, 51(1), 297–317.
Star, S., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Instructional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professional in Berkley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.
Tahta, D. (1998). Counting counts. Mathematics Teaching, 163, 4–11.
Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract meditations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 193–204). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sinclair, N. (2020). On Teaching and Learning Mathematics – Technologies. In: Ben-David Kolikant, Y., Martinovic, D., Milner-Bolotin, M. (eds) STEM Teachers and Teaching in the Digital Era. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29396-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29396-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29395-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29396-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)