Abstract
This chapter examines potential opportunities and challenges associated with giving teachers the opportunity to edit the textbooks they use in class. It draws on a set of studies for which the M-TET (Mathematics Teachers Edit Textbooks) project served as research setting. The unique aspects that characterize the work environment offered to teachers include the following: producing a textbook by making changes in a textbook designed by expert curriculum developers, designing a textbook for a broad student population, collaborating with other teachers in order to produce an agreed-upon textbook, and consulting with professionals that are not part of the teachers’ usual milieu (textbook authors and mathematicians). This chapter demonstrates first the potential of the M-TET work environment to reveal teachers’ wishes and desires regarding textbooks, and it attends to possible implications of teachers’ editing of textbooks with respect to the ways in which mathematics is portrayed and offered. It then focuses on the potential of the M-TET work environment to transform the conventional connections of teachers with textbook authors and with mathematicians.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ayalon, M., & Even, R. (2014). Students’ opportunities to engage in transformational algebraic activity in different beginning algebra topics and classes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(Suppl 2), S285–S307.
Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153–187.
Eisenmann, T., & Even, R. (2011). Enacted types of algebraic activity in different classes taught by the same teacher. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 867–891.
Even, R., Ayalon, M., & Olsher, S. (2016). Teachers editing textbooks: Transforming conventional connections among teachers, textbook authors, and mathematicians. In M. Phakeng & S. Lerman (Eds.), Mathematics education in a context of inequity, poverty and language diversity: Giving direction and advancing the field (pp. 127–140). Dordrecht, The Netherlands/Heidelberg, Germany/New York, NY/London, UK: Springer.
Even, R., & Kvatinsky, T. (2010). What mathematics do teachers with contrasting teaching approaches address in probability lessons? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74, 207–222.
Even, R., & Olsher, S. (2014). Teachers as participants in textbook development: The integrated mathematics wiki-book project. In L. Yeping & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 333–350). Dordrecht, The Netherlands/Heidelberg, Germany/New York, NY/London, UK: Springer.
Friedlander, A., Even, R., & Robinson, N. (2018). Designing mathematics textbooks: The case of the integrated mathematics curriculum program. In N. Movshovitz-Hadar (Ed.), K-12 mathematics education in Israel: Issues and challenges. Series on mathematics education: Volume 13 (pp. 209–216). Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific Publication. ISBN: 978-981-3231-18-4.
Gottlieb, A. (2016). Changes suggested by teachers in the textbook they use in class: The case of equivalent algebraic expressions. Master thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science (in Hebrew).
Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590.
Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward a comprehensive perspective on proof. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of teachers of mathematics (pp. 805–842). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Hoffmann, A. & Even, R. (2018). What do mathematicians wish to teach teachers in secondary school about mathematics? In E. Bergqvist, M. Österholm, C. Granberg, & L. Sumpter (Eds.), Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 99–106). Umeå, Sweden: PME.
Leshota, M., & Adler, J. (2014). The analysis of teachers’ mobilisation of the textbook. In K. Jones, C. Bokhove, G. Howson, & L. Fan (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference on mathematics textbook research and development (ICMT-2014) (pp. 291–296). Southampton, GB: University of Southampton.
Ministry of Education. (2009). Mathematics curriculum for grades 7–9. Jerusalem, Israel: Author. (Hebrew).
Ministry of Education. (2013). General introduction to the junior high-school mathematics curriculum. (Hebrew). Retrieved from http://meyda.education.gov.il/files/Mazkirut_Pedagogit/matematika/mavo.pdf
Olsher, S., & Even, R. (2018). Organizing tools suggested by teachers in the mathematics textbook they use in class. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9902-2.
Pilet, J. (2013). Implicit learning in the teaching of algebra: Designing a task to address the equivalence of expressions. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th congress of the European Society for Research in mathematics education (pp. 510–519). Ankara, Turkey: Middle East Technical University and ERME.
Remillard, J. T., Herbel-Eisenmann, B. A., & Lloyd, G. M. (Eds.). (2009). Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 152–170). New York, NY: Routledge.
Smith, J. P., & Phillips, E. A. (2000). Listening to middle school students’ algebraic thinking. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 6, 156–161.
Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Tarr, J. E., Chavez, O., Reys, R. E., & Reys, B. J. (2006). From the written to the enacted curricula: The intermediary role of middle school mathematics teachers in shaping students’ opportunity to learn. School Science and Mathematics, 106, 191–201.
Tatto, M. T., Lerman, S., & Novotna, J. (2009). Overview of teacher education systems around the world. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: The 15th ICMI study (pp. 15–24). New York, NY: Springer.
Tatto, M. T., Lerman, S., & Novotna, J. (2010). The organization of the mathematics preparation and development of teachers: A report from the ICMI study 15. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13, 313–324.
Thompson, D. R., & Senk, S. L. (2014). The same geometry textbook does not mean the same classroom enactment. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5), 781–795.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Even, R. (2020). Mathematics Teachers Edit Textbooks: Opportunities and Challenges. In: Ben-David Kolikant, Y., Martinovic, D., Milner-Bolotin, M. (eds) STEM Teachers and Teaching in the Digital Era. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29396-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29396-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29395-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29396-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)