Abstract
This essay discusses three chapters in this volume: Milner-Bolotin, Deliberate pedagogical thinking with technology in STEM teacher education; Tabach & Trgalová, Teaching mathematics in the digital era: Standards and beyond; Zazkis, Technology in mathematics teacher education: On trust and pitfalls. Informed by theoretical constructs and frameworks such as of distributed cognition, affordance, appropriation, and knowledge in pieces, this chapter highlights and elaborates on the following crosscutting themes: technology provides different forms of doing, the intrinsic and instructional affordances of technology, appropriating ICT for instruction, teachers’ professional knowledge, and implications for teacher education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bakhtin, M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. In M. Holquist (Ed.), The dialogic imagination (pp. 259–422). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching what makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Bråten, I., Ferguson, L. E., Strømsø, H. I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2014). Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 58–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12005
diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. L. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155–1191.
diSessa, A. A., & Wagner, J. F. (2005). What coordination has to say about transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multi-disciplinary perspective (pp. 121–154). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Gibson, J. J. (1986). The ecological approach to visual perceptions. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Greeno, J. G. (1994). Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review, 101(2), 336–342.
Haspekian, M. (2011). The co-construction of a mathematical and a didactical instrument. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME7) (pp. 2298–2307). Rzeszów.
Hutchins, E. (1995). How a cockpit remembers its speed Hutchins. Cognitive Science, 19, 265–288.
Hutchins, E. (2006). The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction. In N. J. Enfield & S. C. Levinson (Eds.), Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction (pp. 375–398). Oxford, UK: Berg Publishers.
Kapon, S. (2015). From new educational technologies to a personal-instructional repertoire. In M. Grangeat (Ed.), Understanding science teachers’ professional knowledge growth (pp. 171–185). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
Kapon, S., Ron, G., Hershkowitz, R., & Dreyfus, T. (2015). Perceiving permutations as distinct outcomes: The accommodation of a complex knowledge system. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 88(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9570-2
Levrini, O., Fantini, P., Pecori, B., Tasquier, G., & Levin, M. (2015). Defining and operationalizing ‘appropriation’ for science learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 24(1), 93–136.
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York, NY: Routlage.
Milner-Bolotin, M. (in this volume). Deliberate pedagogical thinking with technology in STEM teacher education. In Y. B. D. Kolikant, D. Martinovic, & M. Milner-Bolotin (Eds.), STEM teachers and teaching in the digital era. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Rabardel, P. (2002). People and technology – A cognitive approach to contemporary instruments. Retrieved from https://hal-univ-paris8.archives-ouvertes.fr/file/index/docid/1020705/filename/people_and_technology.pdf
Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing sociocultural activities on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided appropriation and apprenticeship. In J. V. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & P. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of the mind (pp. 139–164). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107–149). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Tabach, M., & Trgalová, J. (in this volume). Teaching mathematics in the digital era: Standards and beyond. In Y. B. D. Kolikant, D. Martinovic, & M. Milner-Bolotin (Eds.), STEM teachers and teaching in the digital era. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Wagner, J. F. (2010). A transfer-in-pieces consideration of the perception of structure in the transfer of learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(4), 443–479.
Zazkis, R. (in this volume). Technology in mathematics teacher education: On trust and pitfalls. In Y. B. D. Kolikant, D. Martinovic, & M. Milner-Bolotin (Eds.), STEM teachers and teaching in the digital era. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kapon, S. (2020). Emergent STEM Teaching Possibilities in an Era of Educational Technologies. In: Ben-David Kolikant, Y., Martinovic, D., Milner-Bolotin, M. (eds) STEM Teachers and Teaching in the Digital Era. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29396-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29396-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29395-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29396-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)