Abstract
Environmental resources and how these should be managed are an area where tensions between state and social movements have long festered. Direct action by social movement actors is particularly challenging in this context, as it requires the state to physically engage with activists. When coupled with the proliferation of media technologies the reputational costs can be high, with activists demonstrating the heavy-handed nature of the state’s responses. Attempting to reduce the potential backlash, states may turn to preventative deterrence, dissuading social movement participants by raising the potential costs to those involved. Overt methods, including banning orders, legal restrictions, or regulation can be effective, but risk reinforcing portrayals of the state as preventing the free expression of deeply felt concerns. Covert or hidden methods can enable the state to gain information and develop more sophisticated deterrent tools and subvert from within, but risk significant reputational damage if exposed. This chapter considers the case of New Zealand to examine how overt and covert forms of deterrence have been used to deter environmental activism and how these have impacted the environmental movement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aminzade R, McAdam D (2001) Emotions and contentious politics. In: Aminzade R, Goldstone J, McAdam D, Perry E, Sewell W Jr, Tarrow S, Tilly C (eds) Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 14–50
Battersby J (2018) Terror where terror is not: Australian and New Zealand terrorism compared. Stud Confl Terror 41(1):59–76
Boykoff J (2007) Limiting dissent: the mechanisms of state repression of the USA. Soc Mov Stud 6(3):281–310
Bradley T, Sedgwick C (2010) Policing beyond the police: a “first cut” study of private security in New Zealand. Polic Soc 19(4):468–492
Bührs T (2014) Environmentalism in New Zealand. In: Doyle T, MacGregor S (eds) Environmental movements around the world: shades of green in politics and culture, vol 2. Praeger, Santa Barbara, pp 331–358
Carson J (2014) Counterterrorism and radical eco-groups: a context for exploring the series hazard model. J Quant Criminol 30(3):485–504
Cianchi J (2015) Radical environmentalism: nature, identity and more-than-human agency. Palgrave, Basingstoke
Cunningham D (2003) State versus social movement: FBI counterintelligence against the new left. In: Goldstone J (ed) States, parties and social movements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 45–77
Cunningham D, Browning B (2004) The emergence of worthy targets: official frames and deviance narratives within the FBI. Sociol Forum 19(3):347–369
Cunningham D, Soto-Carrión R (2015) Infiltration. In: Duyvendak J, Jasper J (eds) Breaking down the state: protestors engaged. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, pp 157–178
Dalton R, Recchia R, Rohrschneider R (2003) The environmental movement and the modes of political action. Comp Pol Stud 36(7):743–771
Davenport C (2017) Performing order: an examination of the seemingly impossible task of subjugating large numbers of people, everywhere, all of the time. In: Morgan K, Orloff A (eds) The many hands of the state: theorizing political authority and social control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 258–283
Downes D (2000) The New Zealand environmental movement and the politics of inclusion. Aust J Polit Sci 35(3):471–491
Earl J (2003) Tanks, tear gas, and taxes: toward a theory of movement repression. Sociol Theory 21(1):44–68
Earl J (2004) Controlling protest: new directions for research on the social control of protest. In: Myers D, Cress D (eds) Authority in contention. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp 55–83
Endres D, Senda-Cook S (2011) Location matters: the rhetoric of place in protest. Q J Speech 97(3):257–282
Evans E (2016) Bearing witness: how controversial organizations get the media coverage they want. Soc Mov Stud 15(1):41–59
Gale R (1986) Social movements and the state: the environmental movement, countermovement, and government agencies. Sociol Perspect 29(2):202–240
Goldstone J, Tilly C (2001) Threat (and opportunity): popular action and state response in the dynamics of contentious action. In: Aminzade R, Goldstone J, McAdam D, Perry E, Sewell W Jr, Tarrow S, Tilly C (eds) Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 179–194
Greenpeace New Zealand (2014) Greenpeace win Supreme Court battle, August 6. http://www.greenpeace.org/new-zealand/en/press/Greenpeace-Win-Supreme-Court-Battle/. Accessed 24 Nov 2017
Hager N, Mussen D (2007) I was paid to betray protestors. Sunday Star-Times, 27 May
Hall K (2008) Solid energy boss dodges stunt. The Press, 25 November
King M (2013) Disruption is not permitted: the policing and social control of occupy Oakland. Crit Criminol 21(4):463–475
Kousis M (2004) Economic opportunities and threats in contentious environmental politics: a view from the European South. Theory Soc 33(3):393–415
Kousis M, della Porta D, Jimenez M (2008) Southern European environmental movements in comparative perspective. Am Behav Sci 51(11):1627–1647
Lee R (2015) Charity without politics? Exploring the limits of “politics” in charity law. J Civ Soc 11(3):271–282
Lidskog R, Elander I (2007) Representation, participation and deliberation? Democratic responses to environmental challenge. Space Polity 11(1):75–94
MacLean M (2010) Anti-apartheid boycotts and the affective economies of struggle: the case of Aotearoa New Zealand. Sport Soc 13(1):72–91
Mark A, Turner K, West C (2001) Integrating nature conservation with hydro-electric development: conflict resolution with lakes Manapouri and Te Anau, Fiordland National Park, New Zealand. Lake Reservoir Manage 17(1):1–16
Marx G (1974) Thoughts on a neglected category of social movement participant: the agent provocateur and the informant. Am J Sociol 80(2):402–442
McAdam D, Tarrow S, Tilly C (2001) Dynamics of contention. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
McClintock W, Taylor C (2002) Business ownership in natural resource dependent industries in New Zealand. Paper prepared for the 9th international symposium on society and resource management, Indiana University, Bloomington, 2–5 June
McMenamin M (2013) Protest at sea: an analysis of the Crown Minerals Amendment Act 2013. LLM Research Paper, Victoria University Wellington. http://researcharchive.vuw.ac.nz/xmlui/bitstream/handle/10063/3405/thesis.pdf?sequence=2. Accessed 24 Nov 2017
Meyer D (2003) Political opportunity and nested institutions. Soc Mov Stud 2(1):17–35
Meyer D, Minkoff D (2004) Conceptualizing political opportunity. Soc Forces 82(4):1457–1492
Morgan K, Orloff A (2017) Introduction: the many hands of the state. In: Morgan K, Orloff A (eds) The many hands of the state: theorizing political authority and social control. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–32
NZPA (2004) Protesters occupy proposed mine site. New Zealand Press Association, 13 April
NZPA (2005a) Cold and rain may drive coal protesters sway. New Zealand Press Association, 7 March
NZPA (2005b) Protesters lock themselves to rail line – stop coal trains. New Zealand Press Association, 13 August
NZPA (2006a) Save happy valley protesters take to the streets of Wellington. New Zealand Press Association, 4 November
NZPA (2006b) Anti-mining protesters target solid energy headquarters. New Zealand Press Association, 15 February
NZPA (2007) Two arrested over anti-coal mining protest on Chch Railway Line. New Zealand Press Association, 29 April
NZPA (2008) Climate change March to begin on January 28. New Zealand Press Association, 19 January
O’Brien T (2013a) Fires and flotillas: opposition to offshore oil exploration in New Zealand. Soc Mov Stud 12(2):221–226
O’Brien T (2013b) Fragmentation or evolution? Understanding change within the New Zealand environmental movement. J Civ Soc 9(3):287–299
O’Brien T (2015) Social control and the New Zealand environmental movement. J Sociol 51(4):785–798
O’Brien T (2016) Camping, climbing trees and marching to parliament: spatial dimensions of environmental protest in New Zealand. Kōtuitui N Z J Soc Sci Online 11(1):11–22
O’Brien T (2017) “Cut pollution, create jobs? Yeah, nah”: partisan effects on environmental protest in Aotearoa New Zealand. Policy Sci 69(3):264–281
Offe C (1985) New social movements: challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Soc Res 52(4):817–868
Papatsoumas N (2014) Greenpeace wins right to register as charity. New Zealand Herald, 6 August
Rodgers K (2010) “Anger is why we’re all here”: mobilizing and managing emotions in a professional activist organization. Soc Mov Stud 9(3):273–291
Rootes C (2007a) Environmental movements. In: Snow D, Soule S, Kriesi H (eds) The Blackwell companion to social movements. Blackwell, Malden, pp 608–640
Rootes C (2007b) Acting locally: the character, contexts and significance of local environmental mobilisations. Environ Polit 16(5):722–741
Sewell W (2001) Space in contentious politics. In: Aminzade R, Goldstone J, McAdam D, Perry E, Sewell W Jr, Tarrow S, Tilly C (eds) Silence and voice in the study of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 879–125
Smellie P (2013) At sea with “Anadarko Amendment”. Stuff.co.nz, April 10. http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opinion-analysis/8536316/At-sea-with-Anadarko-amendment. Accessed 7 Sept 2017
Tarrow S (1993) Cycles of collective action: between moments of madness and the repertoire of contention. Soc Sci Hist 17(2):282–307
Tarrow S (2011) Power in movement: social movements and contentious politics, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Taylor B (2008) The tributaries of radical environmentalism. J Study Radic 2(1):27–61
The Press (2009) Group brings protest to city, 24 April
Tilly C (2008) Contentious performances. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Tilly C, Tarrow S (2007) Contentious politics. Boulder, Paradigm
van der Heijden H (1999) Environmental movements, ecological modernization and political opportunity structures. Environ Polit 8(1):199–221
Vicari S (2015) The interpretative dimension of transformative events: outrage management and collective action framing after the 2001 anti-G8 summit in Genoa. Soc Mov Stud 14(5):596–614
Walby K, Monaghan J (2011) Private eyes and public order: policing and surveillance in the suppression of animal rights activists in Canada. Soc Mov Stud 10(1):21–37
Zald M (1978) On the social control of industries. Soc Forces 57(1):79–102
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Brien, T. (2020). ‘The Outrage Was Really Quite Visceral’1: Overt and Covert Deterrence Effects on Social Movement Activism. In: Filippidou, A. (eds) Deterrence. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29367-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29367-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29366-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29367-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)