Abstract
Contemporary phenomenology intends to explore the territories perhaps indicated but mostly ignored or abandoned by Husserl and Heidegger. However, it can be considered an heir to historical phenomenology when understood as a general path of inquiry into phenomenality. Its common goal is to study phenomena like invisible, totality, affectivity, le visage or Saturated Phenomena which escape the givenness of meaning determined by consciousness and its correlative noetic-noematic structure. This pathos of thought proceeds from a change of paradigm, the modification of the concept of phenomenon now considered as the event of meaning. The phenomenon as occurring, its transpiring as and in an event, brings together several of its features: the spontaneous formation of meaning, the nonobjective excess (ungegenständlicher Überschuss) at the heart of the phenomenon and the paradoxical character of the given. I will examine three protagonists of this new movement, Michel Henry, Merleau-Ponty and Jean-Luc Marion, in order to understand the modification of the concept of phenomenon as givenness and event.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bernet, Rudolf. 2012. Phenomenological and Aesthetic Epoché: Painting the Invisible Things themselves. In The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology, ed. Dan Zahavi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gondek, Hans-Dieter, and László Tengelyi. 2011. Neue Phänomenologie in Frankreich. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
Henry, Michel. 1963. L’essence de la manifestation. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
———. 2003. Phénoménologie de la vie, vol. I. De la phénoménologie. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
———. 2015. Material Phenomenology. In The Quiet Powers of the Possible Interviews in Contemporary French Phenomenology, ed. Tarek R. Dika and W. Chris Hackett. New York: Fordham University Press.
Husserl, Edmund. 1962. (Ideas I) Ideas: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson. New York: Collier.
Marion, Jean-Luc. 1998. Reduction and Givenness. Translated by Thomas A. Carlson. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
———. 2002. Being Given: Toward a Phenomenology of Givenness. Translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
———. 2008. The Visible and the Revelead. Translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner. New York: Fordham University Press.
———. 2015. Negative Certainties. Translated by Stephen E. Lewis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1968. The Visible and the Invisible. Translated by Alphonso Lingis: Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Şan, Emre. 2012. Transcendance comme problème phénoménologique: Lecture de Merleau-Ponty et Patočka. Prefaced by Renaud Barbaras. Paris: Mimesis.
Sebbah, François-David. 2012 Testing the Limit: Derrida, Henry, Levinas, and the Phenomenological Tradition. Translated by Stephen Barker. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Şan, E. (2020). Phenomenological Crossings: Givenness and Event. In: Apostolescu, I. (eds) The Subject(s) of Phenomenology. Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 108. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29357-4_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29357-4_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29356-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29357-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)