Advertisement

Digital Workflow in Zygomatic Implant Therapy

Chapter

Abstract

Dentistry has changed tremendously in the past decades. Discovery of osseointegration and its application have revolutionized dentistry like never before. A fixed dental prosthesis for rehabilitation of the edentulous jaw is no longer an impossible dream. Instead, it is now an expected and common outcome. This opens new challenges in both surgical and prosthetic disciplines. Today, there are more innovations surrounding implant dentistry including soft and hard tissue reconstruction, prosthodontics, and aesthetic considerations, as well as new methods of diagnosis and treatment planning and application of digital technology.

Keywords

Zygomatic Zygomatic implant CBCT Guided surgery Digital Digital workflow 

References

  1. 1.
    Branemark PI, Grondahl K, Ohrnell LO, Nilsson P, Retruson B, Svensson B, Engstrand P, Nannmark U. Zygoma fixture in the management of advanced atrophy of the maxilla: technique and long-term results. Scan J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2004;38:70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Esposito M, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth; dental implants in zygomatic bone for the rehabilitation of the severely deficient edentulous maxilla. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005; (4): 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aparicio C, Manresa C, Francisco K, Claros P, Alandez J, Gonzalez-Martin O, Albrektsson T. Zygomatic implants: indications, techniques and outcomes, and the zygomatic success code. Periodontology 2000. 2014;66:41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chow J, Hui E, Lee PK, Li W. Zygomatic implants—protocol for immediate occlusal loading: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Sure. 2006;64:804–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miglioranca RM, Scotto-Major BS, Senna PM, Francischone CE, Cury AADB. Immediate occlusal loading of extrasinus zygomatic implants: a prospective cohort study with a follow-up period of 8 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;41:1072–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malo P, Nobre Mde A, Lopes A, Ferro A, Moss S. Five-year outcome of a retrospective cohort study on the rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae with immediately loaded zygomatic implants placed extra-maxillary. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(3):267–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chow J, Wat P, Hui E, Lee P, Li W. A new method to eliminate the risk of maxillary sinusitis with zygomatic implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(6):1233–40.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hinze M, Vrielinck L, Thalmair T, Wachtel H, Bolz W. Zygomatic implant placement in conjunction with sinus bone grafting: the “extended sinus elevation technique.” A case-cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(6):e378–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hung KF, AI QY, Fan SC, Wang F, Huang W, Wu YQ. Measurement of the zygomatic region for the optimal placement of quad zygomatic implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2017:1–8.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chauhan S, Dhakshaini MR, Gujjari AK. CAD CAM in implant dentistry. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing; 2017.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vrielinck L, Politis C, Schepers S, Pauwels M, Nart I. Image-based planning and clinical validation of zygoma and pterygoid implant placement in patients with severe bone atrophy using customised drill guides. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32:7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen X, Wu Y, Wang C. Application of a surgical navigation system in the rehabilitation of the maxillary defects using zygoma implants: report of one case. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(5):29–34.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hung KF, Huang W, Wang F, Wu YQ. Real-time surgical navigation system for the placement of zygomatic implants with severe bone deficiency. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(6):1444–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chow J. About 3D printing. The Hong Kong Medical Diary. 2013;18(11):26–8.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raico Gallardo YN, da Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, Morimoto S, Sesma N, Cordaro L. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(5):602–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chow J. A novel device for template-guided surgery of the zygomatic implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45:1253–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Widmann G, Berggren JP, Fischer B, Pichler-Dennhardt AR, Schullian P, Bale R, Puelacher W. Accuracy of image-fusion stereolithographic guides: mapping CT data with three-dimensional optical surface scanning. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(Suppl 2):e736–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schwab K. The fourth industrial revolution. London: Portfolio Penguin; 2016.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brånemark Osseointegration CenterHong KongChina
  2. 2.The University of Hong KongHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations