Diagnostic Imaging for Zygomatic Implants



This chapter discusses the application of volumetric imaging techniques, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), in the planning of zygomatic implants. The strengths and weaknesses of these modalities are compared. The relevant anatomic structures demonstrated with these modalities are reviewed. Radiological identification of pathology associated with the maxillary-zygomatic complex and adjacent structures is a critical aspect introduced in this chapter.


Zygomatic implants Zygoma CBCT Maxillary sinus 


  1. 1.
    Koong B. Cone beam imaging: is this the ultimate imaging modality? Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:1201–8. Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Bosmans H. Modern dental imaging: a review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2637–55. Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tyndall DA, Price JB, Tetradis S, Ganz SD, Hildebolt C, Scarfe WC. Position statement of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology on selection criteria for the use of radiology in dental implantology with emphasis on cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;113:817–26. Scholar
  4. 4.
    Angelopoulos C, Aghaloo T. Imaging technology in implant diagnosis. Dent Clin N Am. 2011;55:141–58. Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmad M, Jenny J, Downie M. Application of cone beam computed tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(Suppl 1):82–94. Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mupparapu M, Nadeau C. Oral and maxillofacial imaging. Dent Clin North Am. 2017;60:1–37. Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scherer MD. Presurgical implant-site assessment and restoratively driven digital planning. Dent Clin N Am. 2014;58:561–95. Scholar
  8. 8.
    White SC, Pharoah MJ. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. Dent Clin N Am. 2008;52:689. Scholar
  9. 9.
    White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology principles and interpretation. 7th ed. Missouri: Elsevier Mosby; 2014.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(Suppl 1):46–60. Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K, Walker A, Bosmans H, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R, Horner K. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114:127–35. Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schulze R, Heil U, Gro D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011;40:265–73. Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomax. 2015;44:20140224. Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loubele M, Van Assche N, Carpentier K, Maes F, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D, Suetens P. Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2008;105:512–8. Scholar
  15. 15.
    Halperin-Sternfeld M, Machtei E, Horwitz J. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography for dimensional linear measurements in the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2014;29:593–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fatemitabar S, Nikgoo A. Multichannel computed tomography versus cone-beam computed tomography: linear accuracy of in vitro measurements of the maxilla for implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 2010;25:499–505.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GRJ. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38:609–25. Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pauwels R, Jacobs R, Singer SR, Mupparapu M. CBCT-based bone quality assessment: are Hounsfield units applicable? Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44:20140238. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Swennen GRJ, Schutyser F. Three-dimensional cephalometry: spiral multi-slice vs cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006;130:410–6. Scholar
  20. 20.
    SEDENTEXCT. Radiation protection 172: cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology - evidence-based guidelines. Eur Comm. 2012;156Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hofmann E, Schmid M, Lell M, Hirschfelder U. Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry. J Orofac Orthop. 2014;75:384–98. Scholar
  22. 22.
    Liang X, Jacobs R, Hassan B, Li L, Pauwels R, Corpas L, Souza PC, Martens W, Shahbazian M, Alonso A, Lambrichts I. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). Part I. On subjective image quality. Eur J Radiol. 2010;75:265–9. Scholar
  23. 23.
    Harris D, Horner K, Gröndahl K, Jacobs R, Helmrot E, Benic GI, Bornstein MM, Dawood A, Quirynen M. E.A.O. guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry 2011. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration at the Medical University of Warsaw. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:1243–53. Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ludlow JB, Timothy R, Walker C, Hunter R, Benavides E, Samuelson DB, Scheske MJ. Effective dose of dental CBCT—a meta analysis of published data and additional data for nine CBCT units. Br Inst Radiol. 2015;44:20140197. Scholar
  25. 25.
    Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, Marchal G, Sanderink G, Jacobs R. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:461–8. Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2008;106:930–8. Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pauwels R. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: dose matters. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;165:156–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Evans CA, Scarfe WC, Ahmad M, Cevidanes LHS, Ludlow JB, Palomo JM, White SC, Simmons KE. Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2013;116:238–57. Scholar
  29. 29.
    Koong B. The basic principles of radiological interpretation. Aust Dent J. 2012;57(Suppl 1):33–9. Scholar
  30. 30.
    Carter L, Farman AG, Geist J, Scarfe WC, Angelopoulos C, Nair MK, Hildebolt CF, Tyndall D, Shrout M. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology executive opinion statement on performing and interpreting diagnostic cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol. 2008;106:561–2. Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ahmed F, Brooks SL, Kapila SD. Efficacy of identifying maxillofacial lesions in cone-beam computed tomographs by orthodontists and orthodontic residents with third-party software. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2012;141:451–9. Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lopes LJ, Gamba TO, Bertinato JVJ, Freitas DQ. Comparison of panoramic radiography and CBCT to identify maxillary posterior roots invading the maxillary sinus. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45:20160043. Scholar
  33. 33.
    Malina-Altzinger J, Damerau G, Grätz KW, Stadlinger PB. Evaluation of the maxillary sinus in panoramic radiography—a comparative study. Int J Implant Dent. 2015;1:17. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial RadiologistEnvision Medical ImagingWembleyAustralia
  2. 2.University of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations