Abstract
New vehicle designs with advanced driver assistance systems need to be validated with respect to human perceptions of comfort and risk. Therefore, human-in-the-loop simulations are used to evaluate a wide range of scenarios in driving simulators. In order to improve human-in-the-loop simulation, the chapter begins by reporting solver advancements that enable the real-time simulation of complex mechatronic systems using high fidelity multibody and multi-physics simulation models. A driving simulator setup is then presented that makes use of the high-fidelity vehicle models and can simulate vehicles with advanced driver assistance systems. The essential components of the simulator are outlined and initial results of a comparison study between high fidelity model and equivalent low fidelity models. Finally, two test cases are described that use respectively an adaptive cruise control function and an autonomous intersection crossing function.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- ABS:
-
Anti-Lock Braking System
- ACC:
-
Adaptive Cruise Control
- ADAS:
-
Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems
- ADF:
-
Automated Driving Functionality
- AIC:
-
Autonomous Intersection Crossing
- CFD:
-
Computational Fluid Dynamics
- DoF:
-
Degree(s) of Freedom
- DTM:
-
Double Track Model
- EPS:
-
Electric Power Steering
- ESP:
-
Electronic Stability Program
- HiL:
-
Hardware in the Loop
- HuiL:
-
Human in the Loop
- ICE:
-
Internal Combustion Engine
- MBS:
-
Multibody Simulation
- MCA:
-
Motion Cueing Algorithm
- OEM:
-
Original Equipment Manufacturer
- SiL:
-
Software in the Loop
- STM:
-
Single Track Model
References
Prescott, W., Heirman, G., Furman, M., De Cuyper, J., Lippeck, A., & Brauner, H. (2012). Using high-fidelity multibody vehicle models in real-time simulations. In SAE 2012 World Congress & Exhibition, Detroit, Technical Paper No. 2012-01-0927.
Garcia de Jalon, J., & Bayo, E. (1994). Kinematic and dynamic simulation of multibody systems: The real-time challenge. New York: Springer.
Arnold, M., Burgermeister, B., & Eichberger, A. (2007). Linearly implicit time integration methods in real-time applications: DAEs and stiff ODEs. Multibody System Dynamics, 17(2–3), 99–117.
Prescott, W. (2011). Parallel processing of multibody systems for real-time analysis. In Proceedings of the 2011 ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on Multibody Dynamics, Brussels.
Shabana, A. A. (1997). Flexible multibody dynamics: Review of past and recent developments. Multibody System Dynamics, 1, 189–222.
Shabana, A. A. (2013). Dynamics of multibody systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hu, Y., Zhan, W., & Tomizuka, M. (2018). Probabilistic prediction of vehicle semantic intention and motion. In IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (pp. 307–313).
Stanger, T., & del Re, L. (2013). A model predictive cooperative adaptive cruise control approach. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference (pp. 1374–1379).
Naranjo, J. E., González, C., GarcÃa, R., & de Pedro, T. (2006). ACC + Stop&Go maneuvers with throttle and brake fuzzy control. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 7(2), 213–225.
Coulter, R. (1990). Implementation of the pure pursuit path tracking algorithm. Carnegie Mellon University Robotics Inst., Report CMU-RI-TR-92-01.
Del Vecchio, D., Malisoff, M., & Verma, R. (2009). A separation principle for hybrid automata on a partial order. In Proceedings of the American Control Conference (pp. 3638–3643).
Hafner, M. R., Cunningham, D., Caminiti, L., & Del Vecchio, D. (2013). Cooperative collision avoidance at intersections: Algorithms and experiments. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 14(3), 1162–1175.
Schmidt, S. F., & Conrad, B. (1970). Motion drive signals for piloted flight simulators. NASA Technical Report @ ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19700017803.pdf. Accessed May 20, 2019.
Reid, L. D., & Nahon, M. A. (1985). Flight simulator motion-base drive algorithms: Part 1—Developing and testing the equations. Technical Report, University of Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies.
Dagdelen, M., Reymond, G., Kemeny, A., Bordier, M., & Maïzi, N. (2004). MPC-based motion cueing algorithm: Development and application to the ULTIMATE driving simulator. In Driving Simulation Conference (DSC), Paris (pp. 221–233).
Fang, Z., & Kemeny, A. (2012). Motion cueing algorithms for a real-time automobile driving simulator. In Driving Simulation Conference (DSC), Paris (pp. 1–12).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_self-driving_car_fatalities. Accessed May 20, 2019.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to acknowledge the ENABLE-S3 project that has received funding from the ECSEL Joint Undertaking under grant agreement No. 692455. This joint undertaking receives support from the European Union’s HORIZON 2020 research and innovation programme and from the governments of Spain, Portugal, Poland, Ireland, Belgium, France, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Slovakia, Norway.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Grottoli, M., van der Heide, A., Lemmens, Y. (2020). A High Fidelity Driving Simulation Platform for the Development and Validation of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems. In: Yan, XT., Bradley, D., Russell, D., Moore, P. (eds) Reinventing Mechatronics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29131-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29131-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29130-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29131-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)