Skip to main content

Urban Policies in Portugal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Foregrounding Urban Agendas

Part of the book series: The Urban Book Series ((UBS))

Abstract

This chapter claims that a Portuguese national urban agenda has been further consolidated and improved since the 1990s, having the European Union as one of its major engine and drivers. After a first overview of the background on urban policies in Portugal, a number of policy programs were studied (Polis, Polis XXI and Portugal 2020, among others), focusing on cities and sustainable urban development during the last three European Union policy programming cycles. The analysis focuses, mainly, on the typology of interventions, including target areas and actors involved, their management, governance models and implementation tools, in order to discuss major tendencies and alignments with international urban agendas. Concepts such as sustainable development, place-based policy or integrated territorial development are at the core of the debate, along with the rhetorical mainstream developed at a European and international level. The chapter settles that, in the studied period, urban policies in Portugal were progressively released from pure physical actions to adopt a rather strategic, integral, governance-based approach, encompassing community programs. The scaling up of the Portuguese national urban policy (NUP) happened at several levels, and now Portugal is considered as an explicit NUP holder, despite no consensus existing on the matter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “A coherent set of decisions derived through a deliberate government-led process of coordination and rallying various actors for a common vision and goal that will promote more transformative productive, inclusive and resilient urban development for the long term” (UN-Habitat 2014; OECD 2017).

  2. 2.

    QREN: National Strategic Reference Framework.

  3. 3.

    Amadora, Gondomar, Lisbon, Loures, Oeiras and Oporto.

  4. 4.

    After ten years experiences within the Community Initiative URBAN I and II, the URBAN Network France and the German–Austrian URBAN Network together with 40 URBAN cities from 10 different member states elaborated the “Declaration of Strasbourg” (“Acquis URBAN”).

  5. 5.

    Integrated Territorial Investments—ITI (European Commission 2014a, 2015), Community-Led Local Development—CLLD (European Commission 2014b) and Article 7 of the ERDF Regulation for Integrated Sustainable Urban Development—ISUD (European Commission 2014c).

  6. 6.

    PDCT—Partnerships for Territorial Development and Cohesion.

  7. 7.

    By means of the de-concentrated services of CCDR/NUTS II.

  8. 8.

    In order to be formally recognized, the 23 EIDT were subject to an assessment process (between November 2014 and April 2015) made by an Evaluation Commission, composed of representatives from the National Agency for Development and Cohesion (ADC), the National Agency for Territorial Development (DGT) and the five Regional Coordination and Development Commissions (CCDR). Evaluation methodology considered three different analytical dimensions: (i) partnership and the involvement of relevant actors; (ii) management, follow-up and monitoring; (iii) alignment with regional strategies and spatial planning plans and programs.

  9. 9.

    OP North, OP Centre, OP Lisbon and OP Alentejo.

  10. 10.

    Out of 278 municipalities in Portugal’s mainland.

  11. 11.

    Under the umbrella of the PEDU, three other operational tools cropped up to guarantee alignment with the selected investment priorities: PAMUS—Action Plan for Sustainable Urban Mobility; PARU—Action Plan for Urban Regeneration; PAICD—Integrated Action Plan for Deprived Communities).

References

  • Barata Salgueiro T, André I, Brito-Henriques E (2015) A Política de Cidades em Portugal: instrumentos, realizações e perspetivas. In: Neto P, Serrano MM (eds) Políticas Públicas, Economia e Sociedade. Contributos para a definição de políticas públicas no período 2014–2020. Smart Book, Alcochete, pp 49–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Barca F (2009) An agenda for a reformed cohesion policy. A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom-Hansen J (2005) Principals, agents, and the implementation of EU cohesion policy. J Eur Public Policy 12:624–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500160136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breda-Vázquez I, Conceição P, Fernandes R (2009) Partnership diversity and governance culture: evidence from urban regeneration policies in Portugal. Urban Stud 46:2213–2238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009339433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner N (2003) Metropolitan institutional reform and the rescaling of state space in contemporary western Europe. Eur Urban Reg Stud 10:297–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764030104002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabral J (2002) Para uma Política de Cidades - Os imperativos, as novas políticas urbanas, as questões críticas. Soc Territ 33:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos V, Ferrao J (2015) O Ordenamento do Território em Portugal: uma Perspetiva Genealógica. Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Castro Neto M, Ascenso R (2015) Entrevista ao Secretário de Estado do Ordenamento do Território e Conservação da Natureza, Miguel de Castro Neto. Smart Cities 10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaco C (2015) Cidades Sustentáveis 2020. Um Referencial Conceptual, Estratégico e Instrumental para o Desenvolvimento Urbano em Portugal. Smart Cities 16–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaco C (2018) Urbanismo como política pública: que mudanças de azimute? Territ Planeam e Urban Teor e Prática 78–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavaco C, Vilares E, Magalhães M et al (2015) Cidades Sustentáveis 2020. Direção-Geral do Território, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Conselho Económico e Social (1997) Colóquio “A Política das Cidades.” Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Conselho de Ministros (2000) Resolução no 26/2000, 15 de outubro. Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Conselho de Ministros (2015) Resolução do Conselho de Ministros No61/2015 de 16 de julho. Diário da República n.o 155/2015, Série I de 2015-08-11, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Dependências (2014) Iniciativa Bairros Críticos ou uma prosa queirosiana. Reportagem 18–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Directorate-General for Regional Policy (2008) Fostering the urban dimension. Analysis of the Operational Programmes co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (2007–2013). Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006) The URBACT Programme, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1999) European spatial development perspective. Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European Union. European Commission, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001) A sustainable Europe for a better world—Gothenburg Chart. Commun Comm 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008) Livro Verde sobre a Coesão Territorial Europeia - Tirar Partido da Diversidade Territorial. Comissão Europeia, Bruxelas

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014a) Integrated territorial investment. Cohesion Policy 2014–2020

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014b) Community-led local development. Cohesion Policy 2014–2020

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014c) Integrated sustainable urban development. Cohesion Policy 2014–2020

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2015) Scenarios for integrated territorial investments

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2007a) Treaty of Lisbon. D la Unión Eur 136:23–42

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2007b) Territorial agenda of the European Union. Towards a more competitive and sustainable Europe of diverse regions, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2010) Toledo informal ministerial meeting on Urban development declaration. Sustain Dev

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2011) Territorial agenda of the European Union 2020. Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrão J (1997) Rede Urbana, Instrumento de Equidade, Coesão e Desenvolvimento? In: Conselho Económico Social (ed) Colóquio “A Política das Cidades.” Conselho Económico Social

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrão J (2018) Novas Agendas Urbanas : Que Desafios para o Ordenamento do Território ? In: Congresso Ibérico Direito do Urbanismo. O Direito e a prática urbanística na Península Ibérica: Desafios da Nova Agenda Urbna da União Europeia. Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrão J, Marques TS (2003) National urban system—overview. Direcção-Geral de Ordenamento do Território e Desenvolvimento Urbano, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Florentino R, Nunes da Silva F (2009) Planeamento Urbano e Desenho Urbano. In: Nunes da Silva F (ed) Métodos e Técnicas para o Desenvolvimento Urbano Sustentável - A Experiência dos Projetos Polis. Parque Expo

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabinete do Secretário de Estado do Ordenamento do Território e das Cidades (2008) Política de cidades polis xxi 2007–2013. Doc. Política

    Google Scholar 

  • Governo de Portugal (2014) Portugal 2020—Acordo de Parceria

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamza C, Frangenheim A, Charles D, Miller S (2014) The role of cities in cohesion policy 2014–2020. European Union

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamede L; Tavares A (2009) O Programa Polis no Processo de Governação Urbana. Pluris, p 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques da Costa E (1999) Uma nota sobre as políticas das cidades em Portugal nos anos noventa. Inforgeo 14:131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques TS, Babo EP, Costa A et al (1997) Sistema Urbano Nacional. Cidades Médias e Dinâmicas Territoriais, vol 1. Direcção-Geral de Ordenamento do Território e Desenvolvimento Urbano, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministério do Planeamento e da Administração do Território (1989) Plano de desenvolvimento Regional—1989–1993

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministério do Planeamento e da Administração do Território (1990) Decreto-Lei no69/90, de 2 de março. Diário da República n.o 51/1990, Série I de 1990-03-02, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministério do Planeamento e da Administração do Território (1994a) Quadro comunitário do apoio PDR plano de desenvolvimento regional 1994–1999. Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministério do Planeamento e da Administração do Território (1994b) Despacho 7/94, 26 de janeiro. Diario da República, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (ed) (2017) National urban policy in OECD countries. OECD Publishing, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagliuso A (2016) La Llei de barris: un pas endavant en la regeneració urbana. Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira M, Gil D (2010) Relevância da escala inter-municipal na operacionalização de sistemas urbanos policêntricos : exemplificação em territórios de baixa densidade * Problematização : Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas da Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Portas N, Domingues Á, Marques TS (2004) Portugal: urban policies or policies with an urban incidence? In: Van Den Berg L, Braun E, Van Der Meer J (eds) National urban policies in the European union. European Institute for Comparative Urban Research, Rotterdam, pp 82–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Queirós M (2017) Desarrollo urbano sostenible en la agenda de cohesión territorial Europea: Política de Ciudades Polis XXI, Portugal1. Perspect Geográfica 18:303. https://doi.org/10.19053/01233769.2680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queirós M, Vale M (2005) Ambiente Urbano E Intervenção Pública: O Programa Polis. Comunicações do X Colóquio Ibérico de Geografia. Universidade de Évora, Évora, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro PCS (2012) A Avaliação das Políticas de Regeneração Urbana em contextos intraurbanos. Universidade do Porto

    Google Scholar 

  • Sá Marques T et al (2002) Sistema Urbano Nacional Rede Complementar. Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa S (2008) Iniciativa Bairros Críticos: Uma experiência em torno de modelos de governança na gestão do território. Cid Comunidades e Territ 69–75. https://doi.org/10.7749/citiescommunitiesterritories.jun2008.016.art04

  • UN-Habitat (2014) The evolution of national urban policies. A global overview. United Nations Human Settlements Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Euroepan Union (2010) Toledo informal ministerial meeting on urban development declaration. European Union, Toledo

    Google Scholar 

  • URBAN-Future (2005) The “Acquis URBAN” using cities’ best practises for European cohesion policy. Common Declar URBAN cities Play European Conference “URBAN Futur June 8th 9th, 2005 Saarbrucken

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale M, Queirós M (2015) Cidades e política de coesão territorial na UE. In: Neto P, Serrano MM (eds) Políticas Públicas, Economia e Sociedade. Contributos para a definição de Políticas no Período 2014–2020. Smart Book, Alcochete, pp 223–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Berg L, Braun E, Van Der Meer J (2004) National urban policies in the European union. European Institute for Comparative Urban Research, Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This chapter is sponsored by Portuguese national funds through the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), I. P.—the Portuguese national agency for science, research and technology—under the project PTDC/GES-URB/29170/2017 SOFTPLAN—From Soft Planning to Territorial Design. Practices and Prospects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cristina Cavaco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cavaco, C., Florentino, R., Pagliuso, A. (2020). Urban Policies in Portugal. In: Armondi, S., De Gregorio Hurtado, S. (eds) Foregrounding Urban Agendas. The Urban Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29073-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics