Skip to main content

Effects of Truss Structure of Social Network on Information Diffusion Among Twitter Users

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems (INCoS 2019)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1035))

Abstract

Analyzing the factors that affect information diffusion through social media is an important research topic for several applications such as realizing effective viral marketing campaigns and preventing the spread of fake news. In this paper, we focus on the community structure of a social network of social media users as a factor affecting information diffusion among those users. We extract two types of community structures, a flow truss and a cycle truss, from the social network of Twitter users and analyze how these structures affect diffusion via cascades of retweets on Twitter. Our results show that tweets disseminated via inter-community retweets have future popularity about 1.2-fold that of tweets disseminated via intra-community retweets. Our results also show that tweets disseminated within a strongly clustered community tend to have less diffusion than tweets disseminated within a weakly clustered community. These results are found both when extracting via cycle truss and flow truss communities, which suggests that our findings are robust against the definitions of community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J.M., Mason, W.A., Watts, D.J.: Everyone’s an influencer: quantifying influence on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM 2011), pp. 65–74. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Naveed, N., Gottron, T., Kunegis, J., Alhadi, A.C.: Bad news travel fast: a content-based analysis of interestingness on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Web Science Conference (WebSci 2011), pp. 1–7. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hong, L., Dan, O., Davison, B.D.: Predicting popular messages in Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web (WWW 2011), pp. 57–58. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P., Chi, E.H.: Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in Twitter network. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom 2010), pp. 177–184. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tsugawa, S., Ohsaki, H.: On the relation between message sentiment and its virality on social media. Soc. Netw. Anal. Mining 7(1), 19:1–19:14 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nematzadeh, A., Ferrara, E., Flammini, A., Ahn, Y.-Y.: Optimal network modularity for information diffusion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113(8), 088701 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Newman, M.E.J., Girvan, M.: Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Phys. Rev. E 69(2), 026113 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ferrara, E.: A large-scale community structure analysis in Facebook. EPJ Data Sci. 1(1), 9 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Meo, P., Ferrara, E., Fiumara, G., Provetti, A.: On Facebook, most ties are weak. Commun. ACM 57(11), 78–84 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Tsugawa, S.: Empirical analysis of the relation between community structure and cascading retweet diffusion. In: Proceedings of the 13th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (ICWSM 2019), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 493–504 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fortunato, S.: Community detection in graphs. Phys. Rep. 486(3), 75–174 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Tsugawa, S.: A survey of social network analysis techniques and their applications to socially aware networking. IEICE Trans. Commun. 102(1), 17–39 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miyauchi, A., Kawase, Y.: What is a network community?: A novel quality function and detection algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM 2015), pp. 1471–1480. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Takaguchi, T., Yoshida, Y.: Cycle and flow trusses in directed networks. Roy. Soc. Open Sci. 3(11), 160270 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, J., Cheng, J.: Truss decomposition in massive networks. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5(9), 812–823 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partly supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 17H01733.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nako Tsuda or Sho Tsugawa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tsuda, N., Tsugawa, S. (2020). Effects of Truss Structure of Social Network on Information Diffusion Among Twitter Users. In: Barolli, L., Nishino, H., Miwa, H. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems. INCoS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1035. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29035-1_30

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics