Skip to main content

The Complexity of the Consistency Problem in the Probabilistic Description Logic \(\mathcal {ALC} ^\mathsf {ME}\)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Frontiers of Combining Systems (FroCoS 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11715))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The probabilistic Description Logic \(\mathcal {ALC} ^\mathsf {ME}\) is an extension of the Description Logic \(\mathcal {ALC} \) that allows for uncertain conditional statements of the form “if C holds, then D holds with probability p,” together with probabilistic assertions about individuals. In \(\mathcal {ALC} ^\mathsf {ME}\), probabilities are understood as an agent’s degree of belief. Probabilistic conditionals are formally interpreted based on the so-called aggregating semantics, which combines a statistical interpretation of probabilities with a subjective one. Knowledge bases of \(\mathcal {ALC} ^\mathsf {ME}\) are interpreted over a fixed finite domain and based on their maximum entropy (\(\mathsf {ME}\)) model. We prove that checking consistency of such knowledge bases can be done in time polynomial in the cardinality of the domain, and in exponential time in the size of a binary encoding of this cardinality. If the size of the knowledge base is also taken into account, the combined complexity of the consistency problem is NP-complete for unary encoding of the domain cardinality and NExpTime-complete for binary encoding.

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the Research Unit FOR 1513 “Hybrid Reasoning for Intelligent Systems”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    see https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/.

  2. 2.

    We will see later (proof of Corollary 14) that setting all probabilities to 1 in a pKB basically yields a classical KB, and thus \(\mathcal {ALC} {^\mathsf {ME}}\) indeed is an extension of \(\mathcal {ALC} \).

  3. 3.

    More precisely, this fact is used in the identities marked with \(*\) below.

References

  1. Baader, F., Borgwardt, S., Koopmann, P., Ozaki, A., Thost, V.: Metric temporal description logics with interval-rigid names. In: Dixon, C., Finger, M. (eds.) FroCoS 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10483, pp. 60–76. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66167-4_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Horrocks, I., Lutz, C., Sattler, U.: An Introduction to Description Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139025355

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Koopmann, P., Turhan, A.-Y.: Using ontologies to query probabilistic numerical data. In: Dixon, C., Finger, M. (eds.) FroCoS 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10483, pp. 77–94. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66167-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chvatal, V.: Linear Programming. W.H Freeman (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gaggl, S.A., Rudolph, S., Schweizer, L.: Fixed-domain reasoning for description logics. In: Proceedings of the ECAI 2016, pp. 819–827. IOS Press (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grove, A., Halpern, J., Koller, D.: Random worlds and maximum entropy. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 2, 33–88 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Halpern, J.Y.: An analysis of first-order logics of probability. Artif. Intell. 46(3), 311–350 (1990)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoehndorf, R., Schofield, P.N., Gkoutos, G.V.: The role of ontologies in biological and biomedical research: a functional perspective. Brief. Bioinform. 16(6), 1069–1080 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kern-Isberner, G. (ed.): Conditionals in Nonmonotonic Reasoning and Belief Revision. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2087. Springer, Heidelberg (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44600-1

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Kern-Isberner, G., Thimm, M.: Novel semantical approaches to relational probabilistic conditionals. In: Proceedings of the KR 2010, pp. 382–392. AAAI Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lutz, C., Schröder, L.: Probabilistic description logics for subjective uncertainty. In: Proceedings of the KR 2010, pp. 393–403. AAAI Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paris, J.B.: Common sense and maximum entropy. Synthese 117(1), 75–93 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Paris, J.B.: The Uncertain Reasoner’s Companion: A Mathematical Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Peñaloza, R., Potyka, N.: Towards statistical reasoning in description logics over finite domains. In: Moral, S., Pivert, O., Sánchez, D., Marín, N. (eds.) SUM 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10564, pp. 280–294. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Pratt, V.R.: Models of program logics. In: Proceedings of the FOCS 1979, pp. 115–122. IEEE Computer Society (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rudolph, S., Krötzsch, M., Hitzler, P.: Type-elimination-based reasoning for the description logic SHIQbs using decision diagrams and disjunctive datalog. Logical Methods in Computer Science 8(1), 38 p. (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rudolph, S., Schweizer, L.: Not too big, not too small... complexities of fixed-domain reasoning in first-order and description logics. In: Oliveira, E., Gama, J., Vale, Z., Lopes Cardoso, H. (eds.) EPIA 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10423, pp. 695–708. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65340-2_57

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Stanley, R.: Enumerative Combinatorics: Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Thimm, M., Kern-Isberner, G.: On probabilistic inference in relationalconditional logics. Logic J. IGPL 20(5), 872–908 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Tobies, S.: The complexity of reasoning with cardinality restrictions and nominals in expressive description logics. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 12, 199–217 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Wilhelm, M., Kern-Isberner, G., Ecke, A.: Basic independence results for maximum entropy reasoning based on relational conditionals. In: Proceedings of the GCAI 2017, EPiC Series in Computing, vol. 50, pp. 36–50. EasyChair (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wilhelm, M., Kern-Isberner, G., Ecke, A., Baader, F.: Counting strategies for the probabilistic description logic \(\cal{ALC}^{\sf ME}\) under the principle of maximum entropy. In: Calimeri, F., Leone, N., Manna, M. (eds.) JELIA 2019. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11468, pp. 434–449. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franz Baader .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Baader, F., Ecke, A., Kern-Isberner, G., Wilhelm, M. (2019). The Complexity of the Consistency Problem in the Probabilistic Description Logic \(\mathcal {ALC} ^\mathsf {ME}\). In: Herzig, A., Popescu, A. (eds) Frontiers of Combining Systems. FroCoS 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11715. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29007-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29007-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29006-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29007-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics