Skip to main content

Abstract

The 5W1H road’s next exit, the right-hand fork, starts with and acceptance of Tom’s phenomenological experience (the what), but quickly terminates in a dead-end where the what, how and why are deeply interconnected, and there is no necessary requirement for a responsible who, other than it being the witness themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For convenience I will use “second-path” (and any other path) anthropomorphically, as though it were an individual rather than a theoretical perspective.

  2. 2.

    Drinkwater, et al. (2013, 2017).

  3. 3.

    Irwin (2007, pp. 8–9).

  4. 4.

    Lampis (2004, p. 43).

  5. 5.

    Brabant (2016) and Frank (1957).

  6. 6.

    Barušs (2010).

  7. 7.

    Morganti (2015).

  8. 8.

    Borutta (2009).

  9. 9.

    Neppe and Close (2015).

  10. 10.

    Campbell (1921, p. 399).

  11. 11.

    Borutta (2009, pp. 192–193).

  12. 12.

    Schäfer (2006).

  13. 13.

    Darby (2010).

  14. 14.

    Schäfer (2006).

  15. 15.

    Ibid., pp. 574–575.

  16. 16.

    Borutta (2009).

  17. 17.

    Carr (1921).

  18. 18.

    Frank (1957).

  19. 19.

    Ibid.

  20. 20.

    Ibid.

  21. 21.

    Schäfer (2006).

  22. 22.

    Brooks (2015).

  23. 23.

    Brown (1985).

  24. 24.

    Brooks (2015); “…superpositions are impossible for objects composed of more than a certain number of particles because of a phenomenon called spontaneous localisation, which suggests that the distribution of mass – its density – is what matters”.

  25. 25.

    That is, the ghost cannot be the energetic expression of matter.

  26. 26.

    Riggs (2013).

References

  • Barušs, I. (2010). Beyond Scientific Materialism: Toward a Transcendent Theory of Consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 17(7–8), 213–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borutta, R. (2009). Paranormal Phenomena, Physics and Dirac Energy. Journal of Spirituality & Paranormal Studies, 32(4), 192–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabant, O. (2016). More Than Meets the Eye: Towards a Post-materialist Model of Consciousness. Explore, 12(5), 347–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. (2015). The Secret Life of Reality. New Scientist, 225(3002), 26–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R. (1985). von Neumann and the Anti-realists. Erkenntnis, 23(2), 149–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. R. (1921). Metaphysics and Materialism. Nature, 108(2717), 399–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, H. W. (1921). The Metaphysical Aspects of Relativity. Nature, 106(2677), 809–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darby, G. (2010). Quantum Mechanics and Metaphysical Indeterminacy. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 88(2), 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater, K., Dagnall, N., & Bate, L. (2013). Into the Unknown: Using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis to Explore Personal Accounts of Paranormal Experiences. Journal of Parapsychology, 77, 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drinkwater, K., Dagnall, N., Grogan, S., & Riley, V. (2017). Understanding the Unknown: A Thematic Analysis of Subjective Paranormal Experiences. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 17(1), 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, P. (1957). Philosophical Uses of Science. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 13(4), 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, H. J. (2007). Science, Nonscience and Rejected Knowledge: The Case of Parapsychology. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 7(1), 8–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampis, R. (2004). The Theory of Reality: Or Why, If We Understand Reality, the Theory of Everything Is an Impossibility. Or How to Establish Basic Principles That Clarify Physical, Mental and Paraphysical Phenomena, and to Dispose of Concepts Such as Non-locality, Place. International Journal of Humanities and Peace, 20(1), 43–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morganti, M. (2015). Dependence, Justification and Explanation: Must Reality Be Well-Founded? Erkenntnis, 80(3), 555–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neppe, V. M., & Close, E. R. (2015). The Concept of Relative Non-locality: Theoretical Implications in Consciousness Research. Explore: The Journal of Science and Healing, 11(2), 102–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, P. J. (2013). Why a Spaceship Cannot Reach the Speed of Light from the Perspective of the Spaceship’s Rest Frame. Latin-American Journal of Physics Education, 7(4), 604–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäfer, L. (2006). A Response to Ervin Laszlo: Quantum and Consciousness. Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 41(3), 573–582.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tony Jinks .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jinks, T. (2019). Defining Reality. In: Psychological Perspectives on Reality, Consciousness and Paranormal Experience. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28902-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics