Abstract
The social mind has a psychological affinity for tradition that translates into favorable perceptions of existing and longer-standing states. In the context of inequality, the longer prevailing social arrangements are in place, the more fairness and legitimacy they are afforded. In this chapter, we present a model of existence and longevity biases that imbues social inequality with legitimacy. People tolerate and find goodness in long-standing socio-political systems by invoking internal qualities and reasons that vindicate their continued existence. We connect these phenomena to psychological processes that rationalize the status quo and prevent social change. Finally, we consider factors that limit the influence of longevity of existence on the legitimation of inequality and how longevity bias may instead be harnessed for the purposes of creating social change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allison, S. T., Mackie, D. M., & Messick, D. M. (1996). Outcome biases in social perception: Implications for dispositional inference, attitude change, stereotyping, and social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 53–93). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Anderson, C. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 139–167.
Blair, I. V., Judd, C. M., & Chapleau, K. M. (2004). The influence of Afrocentric facial features in criminal sentencing. Psychological Science, 15, 674–679.
Blanchar, J. C., & Eidelman, S. (2012). Time in existence confers legitimacy upon miracles, norms, and pseudoscience. Poster presented the political psychology pre-conference at the 13th annual meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Diego, CA.
Blanchar, J. C., & Eidelman, S. (2013). Perceived system longevity increases system justification and the legitimization of inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 238–245.
Blanchar, J. C., & Eidelman, S. (2019). Longevity bias and its implications for explaining, evaluating, and responding to social inequality. Unpublished manuscript. Swarthmore, PA: Swarthmore College.
Burke, E. (1789/1987). In J. G. A. Pocock (Ed.), Reflections on the revolution in France. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
Baron, J. (2014). Heuristics and biases. In E. Zamir & D. Teichman (Eds.). The Oxford handbook of behavioral economics and the law, pp. 3–27. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin 106, 265–289.
Brown, M. J., & Gladstone, N. (2012). Development of a short version of the gender role beliefs scale. International Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 154–158.
Cimpian, A., & Salomon, E. (2014). The inherence heuristic: An intuitive means of making sense of the world, and a potential precursor to psychological essentialism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 461–480.
Clifford, S., Jewell, R. M., & Waggoner, P. D. (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research and Politics, 2, 1–9.
Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1986). Morality items on the 1985 pilot study, ANES pilot study report, no. nes002251. Retrieved from the American National Election Studies’ webpage: http://www.electionstudies.org/Library/papers/documents/nes002251.pdf
Crandall, C. S., Eidelman, S., Skitka, L., & Morgan, G. S. (2009). Status quo framing increases support for torture. Social Influence, 4, 1–10.
Eidelman, S., & Crandall, C. S. (2014). The intuitive traditionalist: How biases for existence and longevity promote the status quo. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 50, pp. 53–104). Burlington: Academic Press.
Eidelman, S., Crandall, C. S., & Pattershall, J. (2009). The existence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 765–775.
Eidelman, S., Pattershall, J., & Crandall, C. S. (2010). Longer is better. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 993–998.
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(223–241), 263–271.
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 25–42.
Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: A classroom demonstration of gullibility. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 44, 118–123.
Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21–38.
Gilbert, D. T., Pelham, B. W., & Krull, D. S. (1988). On cognitive busyness: When person perceivers meet persons perceived. Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 54, 733–740.
Grusky, D. B., & Hill, J. (2018). Inequality in the 21st century. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Hussak, L. J., & Cimpian, A. (2015). An early-emerging explanatory heuristic promotes support for the status quo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 739–752.
Hussak, L. J., & Cimpian, A. (2018a). Investigating the origins of political views: Biases in explanation predict conservative attitudes in children and adults. Developmental Science, 21, e12567.
Hussak, L. J., & Cimpian, A. (2018b). Memory accessibility shapes explanation: Testing key claims of the inherence heuristic account. Memory & Cognition, 46, 68–88.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Hume, D. (1992). A treatise of human nature. New York: Prometheus. (Original work published 1739)
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D., & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 99–108.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (Eds.). (2001). The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209–232.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1991). The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status-quo bias. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193–206.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201–210). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kay, A., Gaucher, D., Peach, J., Laurin, K., Friesen, J., Zanna, M., et al. (2009). Inequality, discrimination, and the power of the status quo: Direct evidence for a motivation to see the way things are as the way they should be. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 421–434.
Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837.
Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 264–268.
King, M. L. Jr. (1968). I see the promised land [Transcript]. Retrieved from http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/document/i-see-the-promised-land/
Kluegel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1986). Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanouse, H. H. Kelley, R. S. Nisbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 151–174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). Belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeland, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 347, 262–265.
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
Laurin, K., Gaucher, D., & Kay, A. (2013). Stability and the justification of social inequality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 246–254.
Maglio, S. J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2015). From time perspective to psychological distance (and back). In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. van Beek (Eds.), Time perspective theory; review, research and application (pp. 143–154). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
McKelvie, S. J. (2013). The existence bias: A systematic replication. Comprehensive Psychology, 2, 3.
Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., & Gilovich, T. (1995). When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 603–610.
Mill, J. S. (1859/2009). On liberty. Portland, OR: The Floating Press.
Moshinsky, A., & Bar-Hillel, M. (2010). Loss aversion and status quo label bias. Social Cognition, 28, 191–204.
Pennycook, G., Fugelsang, J. A., & Koehler, D. J. (2015). What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 34–72.
Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 173–220). New York: Academic Press.
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 7–59.
Sani, F., Bowe, M., Herrera, M., Manna, C., Cossa, T., Miao, X., et al. (2007). Perceived collective continuity: Seeing groups as entities that move through time. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1118–1134.
Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Gonsalkorale, K., Hugenberg, K., Allen, T. J., & Groom, C. J. (2008). The self-regulation of automatic associations and behavioral impulses. Psychological Review, 115, 314–335.
Shockley, E., Rosen, R. K., & Rios, K. (2016). Change resistance moderates existence and longevity biases. Social Influence, 11, 87–100.
Smith, A. (1776/1993). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
Schwartz, B., Ben-Haim, Y., & Dacso, C. (2011). What makes a good decision? Robust satisficing as a normative standard of rational decision making. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41, 209–227.
Taylor, S. E., & Fiske, S. T. (1975). Point of view and perception so causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 439–445.
Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. P., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 107–140.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Uleman, J. S., Newman, L. S., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). People as flexible interpreters: Evidence and issues from spontaneous trait inference. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 211–279). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Van Boven, L., & Ashworth, L. (2007). Looking forward, looking back: Anticipation is more evocative than retrospection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 289–300.
Van der Toorn, J., Tyler, T. R., & Jost, J. T. (2011). More than fair: Outcome dependence, system justification, and the perceived legitimacy of authority figures. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 127–138.
Van Zomeren, M. (2013). Four core social-psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7, 378–388.
Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267–274.
Warner, R. H., Kent, A. H., & Kiddoo, K. L. (2016). Perceived collective continuity and attitudes toward outgroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 595–608.
Warner, R. H., & Kiddoo, K. L. (2014). Are the latter-day saints too later day? Perceived age of the Mormon Church and attitudes toward Mormons. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17, 67–78.
Wohl, M. J. A., & McGrath, A. L. (2007). The perception of time heals all wounds: Temporal distance affects willingness to forgive following an interpersonal transgression. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1023–1035.
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9 (2, Pt. 2), 1–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blanchar, J.C., Eidelman, S. (2019). Everything in Its Right Place: Tradition, Order, and the Legitimation of Long-Standing Inequality. In: Jetten, J., Peters, K. (eds) The Social Psychology of Inequality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28855-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28856-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)