Skip to main content

Necessary Competences of Employees in the Field of Standardization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Development

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 870 Accesses

Abstract

Companies’ actions are increasingly influenced by standards which, for various reasons, are becoming more important. Against this background, the requirements on employees have increased, as standards influence ever further reaching areas of their tasks. On the one hand, products and processes need to be designed according to standards, and on the other hand, companies might consider to actively participate in standardisation processes to ensure that the resulting standards have a positive impact on their businesses. Consequently, we can already differentiate the employees into the large share implementing standards in product development or production processes and the very small number actively involved in standardisation processes. This contribution deals with the question for which “technical and non-technical job profiles” the present European employment market requests standardisation-related competences. In the search for the answer to this question an extensive literature survey as well as an additional field survey have been carried out to identify most relevant topics for standardisation education and job specific requirements. As an overall result of both studies, we present the most important job profiles and their particular demands for standardisation-related competences. Based on these insights contents for general higher education are defined taking different scientific fields, technologies or sectors into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A detailed analysis of the state of research on this topic can be found in the final report of the European study (Blind & Drechsler, 2017).

  2. 2.

    More detailed information about the research design can be found in the final report of the European study, cf. (Blind & Drechsler, 2017).

  3. 3.

    “The 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP) unites seven telecommunications standard development organizations […] The project covers cellular telecommunications network technologies, including radio access, the core transport network, and service capabilities—including work on codecs, security, quality of service—and thus provides complete system specifications.” (3GPP Mobile Competence Centre, 2017).

References

  • 3GPP Mobile Competence Centre. (2017). 3GPP—A global initiative. [Online] Available at: http://www.3gpp.org/about-3gpp.

  • Albers, A., Butenko, V., Breitschuh, J., Walter, B., Drechsler, S., & Burkardt, N. (2015). Guidelines for competence assessment in engineering education an impementation in project NuSaL. In ICED, Hrsg. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Engineering Design. Milan Italy: s.n.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailetti, A. J., & Callahan, J. R. (1995). Managing consistency between product development and public standards evolution. Research Policy, 24, 913–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blind, K., & Drechsler, S. (2017). European Market Needs for Education in Standardisation/Standardisation-related Competence. Brüssel: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blind, K. & Mangeldorf, A. (2016). Motives to standardize: Empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation, February–March, pp. 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blind, K., & Müller, J.-A. (2017). Indikatorenbericht 2017, Deutsches Normungspanel, Normungsforschung, -politik und -förderung. Berlin: Deutscher Förderverein zur Stärkung der Forschung zur Normung und Standardisierung e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blind, K., & Müller, J.-A. (2016). FNS und TU Berlin stellen die Ergebnisse der vierten Befragungsrunde des Deutschen Normungspanels (DNP) mit Fokus auf Digitalisierung vor. DIN-Mitteilungen, 07, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carugi, M. (2013). Industry needs session 1: Company needs for standardisation education. Sophia Antipolis, ICES conference and meeting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conkling, J. (2005). Book Reviews: A Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing. In: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. s.l.: Educational Reviews, pp. 154159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooklev, T. & Bartleson, K. (2008). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers—The strategic value of standards education. In: D. E. Purell, Hrsg. The Strategic Value of Standards Education. Washington D.C.: The Center of Global Standards Analysis, pp. 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drechsler, S. (2016). Competency Requirements implied by Standards and Guidelines for Mechanical Engineers in their day-to-day Activities; Ph.D. Thesis, Karlsruhe: IPEK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drechsler, S. & Albers, A. (2016). A competency model for standardisation in the field of standardisation. In I. Horvath, J. Pernot & Z. Rusak, Hrsg. Proceedings of TMCE 2016. Aixen-Provence, France: TMCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2011). A strategic vision for European standards: Moving forward to enhance and accelerate the sustainable growth of the european economy by 2020. In Communication from the commission to the european parliament, the council and the european economic and social committee, s.l.:COM (2011) 311 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016). European Standards for the 21st century. In Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee of the regions. Brussels: COM (2016), p. 358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freericks, C. (2013). Industry needs for standards engineers—Results from a global inventory. ICES: Sophia Antipolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Großmann, A.-M., Filipovic, E., & Lazina, L. (2016). The strategic use of patents and standards for new product development knowledge transfer. R&D Management, 46(2), 312–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesser, W. & de Vries, H. J. (2011). Academic Standardisation Education in Europe, Hamburg, Rotterdam: Euras—European Academy for Standardisation e.V.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hövel, A., & Schacht, M. (2013). Standardisation in education—A building block for professional careers. In H. de Vries & H. Brand (Eds.), 2013 ICES Conference, What does Industry expect from education about standardisation? Proceedings (pp. 6–15). ICES: Sophia Antipolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO. (2017). Number of secretariats listed by the technical committees and subcommittees of the International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO). [Online]. Available at: www.iso.org/iso/home/about/iso_members.htm.

  • ISO. (2014). Teaching standards; Good practices for collaboration between National Standards Bodies and universities, Geneve: ISO Central Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • IFAN. (2014). Education and training about standardization, different needs for different roles, guide 4:2014. Geneve, Switzerland: IFAN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobs, K., Procter, R. & Williams, R., (2001). The Making of Standards: Looking inside the Work Groups. IEEE Magazine, 04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurokawa, T. (2005). Developing human resources for international standards. Science & Technology Trends—Quarterly Review, pp. 34–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillian, A. (2013). A Rockwell Automation Perspective, ICES 2013 Conference—What does Industry expect from Standards Education? Sophia Antipolis, ICES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, H. (2002). Strategische Bedeutung von Normen für klein- und mittelständische Unternehmen (KMU) im globalen Wettbewerb. In T. Bahke, U. Blum, & G. Eickhoff (Eds.), Normen und Wettbewerb (pp. 67–77). Berlin: Beuth Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Praktikum Info, kein Datum Was sind Soft Skills? Eine Liste zum Überblick. [Online]. Available at: https://www.praktikum.info/karrieremagazin/bewerbung/soft-skills [Zugriff am 18 08 2017].

  • Tanaka, M. (2010). Education needs and JSA activities. Geneve: WSC Academic week.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Center for Global Standards Analysis. (2008). The strategic value of standards education. Washington D.C.: Donald E. Purcell, Chair.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M. B. (1993). The standards development process: A view from political theory. StandardView, 1(2), 12, 35–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Knut Blind .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Blind, K., Drechsler, S. (2020). Necessary Competences of Employees in the Field of Standardization. In: Idowu, S., de Vries, H., Mijatovic, I., Choi, D. (eds) Sustainable Development. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28715-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics