From Boring to Intriguing: Personal Perspective on Making Education About Standardization Appealing to Students

  • Vladislav V. FominEmail author
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)


In this chapter the author shares his initiatives and methods in education about standardization, enlists concepts and relevant bodies of knowledge related to standardization, and identifies challenges and opportunities for education about standardization in the fields of Informatics and Information Systems, and Organizational Management Studies. The chapter ends with the author’s projections on the emerging topics about standardization and recommendations for developing an online repository of teaching materials for education on standardization.


Personal perspective Education about standardization Intriguing strategy Teaching method Inter-disciplinary perspective Informatics Organizational management 


  1. Barlette, Y., & Fomin, V. V. (2008). Exploring the suitability of IS security management standards for SMEs (pp. 1–10). Hawaii: IEEE.
  2. Barlette, Y., & Fomin, V. V. (2009). The adoption of information security management standards: A literature review. In Cyber-security and global information assurance: Threat analysis and response solutions (pp. 119–140). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Retrieved from
  3. Besen, S. M., & Farrell, J. (1994). Choosing how to compete: Strategies and tactics in standardisation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blind, K., & Jungmittag, A. (2008). The impact of patents and standards on macroeconomic growth: A panel approach covering four countries and 12 sectors. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 29, 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blind, K., & Thumm, N. (2004). Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: Empirical evidence and policy implications. Research Policy, 33, 1583–1598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bousquet, F., Fomin, V. V., & Drillon, D. (2009). Standardization: A major tool for competitive intelligence (pp. 27–36). Cergy, France: Wissenschaftsverlag Mainz in Aachen.Google Scholar
  7. David, P. A., & Greenstein, S. (1990). The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1, 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. de Vaujany, F.-X., Fomin, V. V., Lyytinen, K., & Haefliger, S. (2018). Research commentary—Rules, practices and information technology (IT): A trifecta of organizational regulation. Information Systems Research (in print).Google Scholar
  9. de Vries, H. J., Fomin, V., & Dul, J. (2009). International standardization in a multi-stakeholder environment—How a stakeholder can pursue influence. Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  10. Edwards, P. N. (2003). Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In Modernity and technology (pp. 185–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Egyedi, T. M. (2007). IEC lecture series: The importance of standards. Geneva: IEC, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
  12. European Commission. (2013). Cyber-physical systems: Uplifting Europe’s innovation capacity ( Unit A3-DG CONNECT, Communications Networks, Content & Technology Directorate-General.
  13. Farrell, Joseph, & Saloner, G. (1985). Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. Rand Journal of Economics, 16, 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Farrell, J, & Saloner, G. (1987). Competition, compatibility and standards. In Product standardization and competitive strategy. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Farrell, Joseph, & Saloner, G. (1988). Coordination through committees and markets. The Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feldman, M. S., & Pentland, B. T. (2003). Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(1), 94–118. Scholar
  17. Folmer, E., & Verhoosel, J. (2011). State of the art on semantic IS standardization, interoperability and quality. Retrieved from
  18. Fomin, V. V., & Keil, T. (2000). Standardization: Bridging the gap between economic and social theory (Vol. Paper 20, pp. 206–217). Brisbane, Australia: AIS. Retrieved from
  19. Fomin, V. V., Pedersen, M. K., & de Vries, H. J. (2008). Open standards and government policy: Results of a Delphi survey. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 22, 459–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Funk, J. L. (1998). Competition between regional standards and the success and failure of firms in the world-wide mobile communication market. Telecommunications Policy, 22, 419–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Funk, J. L. (2000, September 26–27). The mobile internet market: Lessons from Japan’s i-mode system. Presented at the E-Business Transformation: Sector Developments and Policy Implications, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  22. Funk, J. L. (2002). Global competition between and within standards. The case of mobile phones. Palgrave.Google Scholar
  23. Funk, J. L., & Methe, D. T. (2001). Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: The case of mobile communications. Research Policy, 30, 589–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iversen, E. (1999). Standardization and intellectual property rights: ETSI’s controversial search for new IPR-procedures. Presented at the IEEE Conference on Standardisation and Innovation in Information Technology, Aachen, Germany. Retrieved from
  25. Jakobs, K., Procter, R., & Williams, R. (1998). User participation in standards setting—The panacea? ACM StandardView, 6, 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Katz, M. L. (1986). Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 822–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. American Economic Review, 75, 424–440.Google Scholar
  28. Kwak, J., Lee, H., & Fomin, V. V. (2011). The governmental coordination of conflicting interests in standardisation: Case studies of indigenous ICT standards in China and South Korea. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(7), 789–806. Scholar
  29. Lyytinen, K., & Fomin, V. V. (2002). Achieving high momentum in the evolution of wireless infrastructures: The battle over the 1G solutions. Telecommunications Policy, 26, 149–170. Scholar
  30. Lyytinen, K., & King, J. L. (2002). Around the cradle of the wireless revolution: The emergence and evolution of cellular telephony. Telecommunications Policy, 26, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKinsey. (2015). Industry 4.0: How to navigate digitization of the manufacturing sector. McKinsey & Company. Retrieved from
  32. OECD. (1999). Regulatory reform and international standardization (Working Party of the Trade Committee No. TD/TC/WP(98)36/FINAL). Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Retrieved from
  33. Pedersen, M. K., Fomin, V. V., & de Vries, H. J. (2009). The open standards and government policy. In ICT standardization for E-business sectors: Integrating supply and demand factors (pp. 188–199). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. Retrieved from
  34. Reuters Staff. (2017, February 16). European parliament calls for robot law, rejects robot tax. Retrieved from
  35. Schmidt, S. K., & Werle, R. (1998). Coordinating technology. Studies in the international standardization of telecommunications. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  36. Schoitsch, E., & Niehaus, J. (2017). Strategic agenda on standardization for cyber-physical systems. CP-SETIS. Retrieved from ISBN 978-90-817213-3-2.Google Scholar
  37. Su, J., & Fomin, V. V. (2010). Balancing public and private interests in ICT standardization: The case of AVS codec. In What kind of information society? Governance, virtuality, surveillance, sustainability, resilience, IFIP Series (Vol. 328/2010, pp. 64–72). Springer. Retrieved from
  38. Suttmeier, R., & Yao, X. (2004). China’s post-WTO technology policy: Standards, software, and changing nature of techno-nationalism (No. Special Report No. 7). The National Bureau of Asian Research. Retrieved from
  39. Updegrove, A. (2007a). Government policy and “standards—based neo-colonialism.” Standards Today. A Journal of News, Ideas and Analysis, VI, 1–9.Google Scholar
  40. Updegrove, A. (2007b). It’s time for IPR equal opportunity in international standard setting. Standards Today. A Journal of News, Ideas and Analysis, VI, 1–3.Google Scholar
  41. West, J., & Fomin, V. V. (2001). When government inherently matters: National innovation systems in the mobile telephony industry, 1946–2000. Presented at the Academy of Management annual meeting, Washington, DC. Retrieved from
  42. West, J., & Fomin, V. V. (2011). Competing views of standards competition: Response to Egyedi & Koppenhol. International Journal of IT Standards & Standardization Research (JITSR), 9, i–iv. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vilnius UniversityKaunasLithuania

Personalised recommendations