Abstract
Sustainable development is no longer a luxury, but a necessity. Sustainability standards and certifications are voluntary, commonly third party assessed, agreed upon norms and values relating to environmental, health, wellbeing, social, and ethical issues. From medical devices, to coffee, to fuels; sustainability standards have become an important cog (mechanism) to demonstrate and encourage sustainability leadership. Commonly these standards move beyond the traditional boundaries of manufacturing site process and site to encompass the environmental, social, and economic impacts of whole production chains. Bringing these ideas, modes of thinking, and understanding of the related standards to the classroom is challenging, but vital in pursuit of sustainability. Students of all ages are the practitioners, managers, and experts of the future. Whether they become consultants, academics, engineers, designers, politicians, government employees, or otherwise, they will shape the future of sustainability standards and sustainable development. Therefore, an understanding of standards and certification is important to equip the next generation of global citizens to help us all make sustainable choices. To achieve this, education must equip learners with the ability to interpret, apply and use standards in practice. This chapter briefly explores the role and development of standards in sustainability; and the challenges of bringing these concepts to the classroom. Three simulation exercises are designed to develop an understanding of both the complex challenges of sustainability and the role of standards in sustainable development. The merits, opportunities, and successes of the pedagogical approached are highlighted, concluding with short reflections based on real-world experience in the classroom.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Asal, V., & Blake, E. L. (2006). Creating simulations for political science education. Journal of Political Science Education, 2(1), 1–18.
Bíró, G. I. (2014). ScienceDirect didactics 2.0: A pedagogical analysis of gamification theory from a comparative perspective with a special view to the components of learning. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 148–151.
Brunsson, N., Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2012). The dynamics of standardization: Three perspectives on standards in organization studies. Organization Studies.
BSI (British Standard Institute). (2013). PAS 2070:2013 specification for the assessment of greenhouse gas emissions of a city—Direct plus supply chain and consumption-based methodologies.
Cooper, J. S., & Fava, J. (1999). Teaching life-cycle assessment at universities in North America. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 3(2/3), 13–17.
Dieleman, H., & Huisingh, D. (2006). Games by which to learn and teach about sustainable development: Exploring the relevance of games and experiential learning for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 837–847.
Egyedi, T.M., & Ortt, J. R. (2017). Towards a functional classification of standards for innovation research. In R. Hawkins, K. Blind, & R. Page (Eds.), Handbook of innovation and standards. Edward Elgar.
Glover, D., Law, S., & Youngman, A. (2002). Graduateness and employability: Student perceptions of the personal outcomes of university education. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 7(3), 293–306.
Glynn, S. M., Aultman, L. P., & Owens, A. M. (2005). Motivation to learn in general education programs. The Journal of General Education, 54, 150–170.
Horn, L., Rubin, O., & Schouenborg, L. (2015). Undead pedagogy: How a Zombie simulation can contribute to teaching international relations. International Studies Perspectives, 17(2), 187–201.
Hunt, R. G., Franklin, W. E., & Hunt, R. G. (1996). LCA-how it came about LCA—How it came about—Personal reflections on the origin and LCA in the USA. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1(1), 4–7.
IPCC. (2013). Climate change 2013: The physical science basis. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G. -K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press
Kemp, S., Martin, F., & Maier, P. (2008). A gap analysis of student employability profiles, employer engagement and work-placements. Planet, 21, 16–20.
Kemp, S. (2009). Embedding employability and employer engagement into postgraduate teaching a case study from environmental management systems. Planet, 21(1), 47–52.
Kemp, S., Kendal, J., Warren, A., Wright, L., Canning, J., Grace, M., & Saunders, C. (2015). Global consensus is a dream, but twitter is real: Simulating a sustainable development goals summit through interdisciplinary classroom politics and negotiation by social media. In W. Leal Filho et al. (Eds.), Integrative approaches to sustainable development at university level. World Sustainability Series. Springer: Switzerland.
Klöpffer, W. (2014). Introducing life cycle assessment and its presentation in ‘LCA Compendium’. Background and future prospects in life cycle assessment (pp. 1–37). Dordrecht: Springer.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning amp; Education, 4(2), 193–212.
Komives, K., & Jackson, A. (2014). Voluntary standard systems. In C. Schmitz-Hoffmann, M. Schmidt, B. Hansmann, & D. Palekhov (Eds.), Voluntary standard systems. Berlin: Springer.
Kumar, R., & Lightner, R. (2007). Games as an interactive classroom technique: Perceptions of corporate trainers, college instructors and students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(1), 53–63.
Manning, S., Boons, F., Von Hagen, O., & Reinecke, J. (2012). National Contexts Matter: The Co-Evolution of Sustainability Standards in Global Value Chains. Ecological Economics, 83, 197–209.
McIntosh, D. (2001). The uses and limits of the model United Nations in an international relations classroom. International Studies Perspectives, 2(3), 269–280.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & Von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Management and Marketing, 33(56), 789–812.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.
Schenck, R., & White, P. (2014) Environmental life cycle assessment measuring the environmental performance of products. In R. Schenck & P. White (Eds.), American center for life cycle assessment.
Stenzel, P. L. (2000). Can the ISO 14000 series environmental management standards provide a viable alternative to government regulation? American Business Law Journal, 37(2), 237–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1714.2000.tb00272.x
The British Standards Institution. (2011). Publicly available specification PAS 2050: 2011 specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services.
Turner, D., Williams, I., Kemp, S., Wright, L., Coello, J., & McMurtry, E. (2012). Towards standardization in GHG quantification and reporting. Carbon Management, 3(3), 223–225.
UNA-UK. (2016). Model UN Portal | UNA-UK. Available at: https://www.una.org.uk/get-involved/learn-and-teach/model-un-portal. Accessed December 22, 2017.
United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/7891Transforming%20Our%20World.Pdf. Accessed December 22, 2017.
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1996). Our ecological footprint : Reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publishers.
Williams, I., Kemp, S., Coello, J., Turner, D. A., & Wright, L. A. (2012). A beginner’s guide to carbon footprinting. Carbon Management, 3(1), 55–67.
World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, & The Greenhouse Gas Protocol. (2005). The GHG protocol for project accounting. Washington, USA: World Resources Institute.
Wright, L. A., Kemp, S., & Williams, I. (2011). “Carbon footprinting”: Towards a universally accepted definition. Carbon Management, 2(1), 61–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wright, L.A., Sinistore, J., Levy, M., Flanagan, B. (2020). Standards in the Classroom: A Vehicle for Sustainability Education. In: Idowu, S., de Vries, H., Mijatovic, I., Choi, D. (eds) Sustainable Development. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28715-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28715-3_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28714-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28715-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)