Skip to main content

Opportunities and the Policy Challenges to the Circular Agri-Food System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover EU Bioeconomy Economics and Policies: Volume II

Abstract

The circular economy is not a new concept in economics. Francois Quesnay and the Physiocrats of eighteenth-century France introduced the concept into economics. From a bio-chemical perspective, the law of conservation of mass needs to be considered implying mass can neither be created nor destroyed but allocated differently over time and space in a closed system similar to planet earth. Recently the concept of the circular economy received high policy attention. In the agri-food system the debates are related to issues such as reducing food waste and emissions in food production including greenhouse gases, recycling of food packaging materials and plastic in particular, and cascading use of food products including the use of fertilizing products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is not exactly correct according to the mass-energy equivalence, but for the chemical elements of interest such as carbon or nitrogen, this simplification is acceptable.

References

  • Arrow, K.J., P. Dasgupta, L. Goulder, K.J. Mumford, and K. Oleson. 2012. Sustainability and the Measurement of Wealth. Environment and Development Economics 17: 317–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. 1966. The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. In Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, Resources for the Future, ed. H. Jarrett, 3–14. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovay, J., and J.M. Alston. 2018. GMO Food Labels in the United States: Economic Implications of the New Law. Food Policy 78: 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukkens, S.G. 1997. The Nutritional Value of Edible Insects. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 36 (2–4): 287–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellari, E., C. Soregaroli, T. Venus, and J. Wesseler. 2018. Food Processor and Retailer Non-GMO Standards in the US and EU and the Driving Role of Regulations. Food Policy 78: 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cingiz, K., M. Degnet, and W. Heijman. 2019a. A Cross-Country Measurement of the EU Bioeconomy: An Input-Output Approach. Biomonitor Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cingiz, K., J. Wesseler, and B. Brandt. 2019b. Scoping Analysis of Biopolymer Production in Argentina. ERA CoBioTech Sustainable Co-Production Working Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. 2006. The Conduct of Economics: The Example of Fisher Body and General Motors. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 15 (2): 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doorn, J., and P.C. Verhoef. 2015. Drivers of and Barriers to Organic Purchase Behavior. Journal of Retailing 91 (3): 436–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2014. Towards a Circular Economy: A Zero Waste Programme for Europe. COM (2014), 398 final. https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/pdf/circular-economy-communication.pdf

  • ———. 2015. Closing the Loop–An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. 2015 COM (2015) 614 final. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2015/EN/1-2015-614-EN-F1-1.PDF

  • ———. 2018. Updated Bioeconomy Strategy. https://ec.europa.eu/knowledge4policy/publication/updated-bioeconomy-strategy-2018_en

  • EUROSTAT. 2019. Which Indicators Are Used to Monitor the Progress towards a Circular Economy? https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy/indicators

  • Felbermayr and Larch. 2013. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)-Potentials, Problems and Perspectives. CESifo Forum 2: 49–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederiks, C., and J. Wesseler. 2019. A Comparison of the EU and US Regulatory Frameworks for the Active Substance Registration of Microbial Biological Control Agents. Pest Management Science 75 (1): 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoenen, S., C. Kolympiris, W. Schoenmakers, and N. Kalaitzandonakes. 2014. The Diminishing Signaling Value of Patents between Early Rounds of Venture Capital Financing. Research Policy 43 (6): 956–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalaitzandonakes, N., J. Lusk, and A. Magnier. 2018. The Price of Non-Genetically Modified (Non-GM) Food. Food Policy 78: 38–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmykova, Y., M. Sadagopan, and L. Rosado. 2018. Circular Economy – From Review of Theories and Practices to Development of Implementation Tools. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 135: 190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchherr, J., D. Reike, and M. Hekkert. 2017. Conceptualizing the Circular Economy: An Analysis of 114 Definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 127: 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, J., A. Honkasalo, and J. Seppälä. 2018a. Circular Economy: The Concept and Its Limitations. Ecological Economics 143: 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, J., C. Nuur, A. Feldmann, and S.E. Birkie. 2018b. Circular Economy as an Essentially Contested Concept. Journal of Cleaner Production 175: 544–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, M. 2002. Green Chemistry: An Introductory Text. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lele, U., W. Lesser, and G. Horstkotte-Wesseler. 1999. Intellectual Property Rights in Agriculture. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lusk, J., B. McFadden, and N. Wilson. 2018. Do consumers care how a genetically engineered food was created or who created it? Food Policy 78: 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, A. 2007. Improving Policy Coherence Between Agricultural and Development Policies. 16th International Farm Management Association Congress, a Vibrant Rural Economy – The Challenge for Balance. International Farm Management Association. Cork, Ireland. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, J.A., and H. Tan. 2011. Progress toward a Circular Economy in China: The Drivers (and Inhibitors) of Eco-Industrial Initiative. Journal of Industrial Ecology 15: 435–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, A., R. Dellink, and R. Bibas. 2018. The Macroeconomics of the Circular Economy Transition: A Critical Review of Modelling Approaches. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 130. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/af983f9a-en

  • McCluskey, J., J. Wesseler, and J.A. Winfree. 2018. The Economics and Politics GM Food Labeling: An Introduction to the Special Issue. Food Policy 78: 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2018. Eight Building Blocks for Coherent Implementation of the SDGs. In Policy Coherence for Sustainable Development 2018: Towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264301061-5-en.

  • ———. 2019. Agricultural Policy Monitoring and Evaluation 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/39bfe6f3-en. http://www.oecd.org/agriculture/topics/agricultural-policy-monitoring-and-evaluation/

  • Purnhagen, K.P., and J. Wesseler. 2019. Maximum vs. Minimum Harmonization: What to Expect from the Institutional and Legal Battles in the EU on Gene Editing Technologies? Pest Management Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausser, G., J. Swinnen, and P. Zusman. 2011. Political Power and Economic Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reike, D., W.J.V. Vermeulen, and S. Witjes. 2018. The Circular Economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? — Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy Through a Focus on History and Resource Value Retention Options. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 135: 246–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld, P., and S. van Woudenberg. 2005. Why Fuel Prices Differ. Energy Economics 27: 79–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritzen, S., and G. Sandström. 2017. Barriers to the Circular Economy – Integration of Perspectives and Domains. Procedia CIRP 64: 7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robért, K.-H. 1991. The Physician and the Environment. Reviews in Oncology. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer 4 (2): 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, Q., M. Punt, and J. Wesseler. 2018a. New Plant Breeding Techniques Under Food Security Pressure and Lobbying. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 1324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, Q., T. Janus, M. Punt, and J. Wesseler. 2018b. The Conservation Effects of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Biased Policymakers. Agriculture 8 (7). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture8070108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, P. 2018. Clean Meat: How Growing Meat without Animals Will Revolutionize Dinner and the World. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, S., and A. McHughen. 2008. Regulating Innovative Crop Technologies in Canada: The Case of Regulating Genetically Modified Crops. Plant Biotechnology Journal 6 (3): 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahel, W., and G. Reday-Mulvey. 1976. The Potential for Substituting Manpower for Energy. Report to the Commission of the European Communities. Brussels, (Published as Stahel, W.R. and Reday-Mulvey, G. 1981. Jobs for Tomorrow. New York: Vantage Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E., A.K. Sen, and J.P. Fitoussi. 2009. The Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress Revisited: Reflections and Overview. Sciences Po publications 2009–33. Paris: Sciences Po.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacon, A.G., and M. Metian. 2018. Food Matters: Fish, Income, and Food Supply—A Comparative Analysis. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture 26 (1): 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorrez, L., and H. Vandenburgh. 2019. Challenges in the Quest for ‘Clean Meat’. Nature Biotechnology 37: 215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uehleke, R., and S. Hüttel. 2019. The Free-Rider Deficit in the Demand for Farm Animal Welfare-Labelled Meat. European Review of Agricultural Economics 46: 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venus, T.J., D. Drabik, and J. Wesseler. 2018. The Role of a German Multi-Stakeholder Standard for Livestock Products Derived from Non-GMO Feed. Food Policy 78: 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visie Biomassa 2030, Parliamentary documents II, 33 043, no. 63

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesseler, J., and D. Drabik. 2016. Prices Matter: Analysis of Food and Energy Competition Relative to Land Resources in the European Union. NJAS – Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 77: 19–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Economic Aspects of the Regulatory Framework in the Area of Fertilizers. General for Internal Policies. Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy. Brussels. IP/A/IMCO/2016-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesseler, J., and J. von Brown. 2017. Measuring the Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies. Annual Review of Resource Economics 9: 17.1–17.24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zilberman, David, Ben Gordon, Gal Hochman, and Justus Wesseler. 2018. Economics of Sustainable Development and the Bioeconomy. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 40 (1): 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

References to EU Member States and Their Circular Economy-Related Policy Strategies/Actions

References to OECD Member States and Their Circular Economy-Related Policy Strategies/Actions

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justus Wesseler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cingiz, K., Wesseler, J. (2019). Opportunities and the Policy Challenges to the Circular Agri-Food System. In: Dries, L., Heijman, W., Jongeneel, R., Purnhagen, K., Wesseler, J. (eds) EU Bioeconomy Economics and Policies: Volume II. Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28642-2_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28642-2_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28641-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28642-2

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics