Skip to main content

European Agriculture and the Bioeconomy: A Historical Overview

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EU Bioeconomy Economics and Policies: Volume I

Abstract

Articles 38–44 (Title III) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) govern the European Union (EU)’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Article 38 of the Treaty of Rome in 1957 laid down the establishment of a common market for agricultural products and Article 39 set up a CAP, which was subsequently largely decoupled from the rules of the other common markets. This chapter outlines the historical development of the CAP, the internal market for agriculture and its relationship to the bioeconomy. It illustrates the different steps taken in the agricultural market as well as the policy choices which lie behind it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buller, H., G.A. Wilson, and A. Hol, eds. 2000. Agri-Environmental Policy in the European Union. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. 2010. Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Brussels: European Commission, COM(2010) 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe. Brussels: European Commission, COM(2012) 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017a. Staff Working Document on the Review of the 2012 European Bioeconomy Strategy. Brussels: European Commission, SWD(2017) 374.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017b. The Future of Food and Farming. Brussels: European Commission, COM(2017) 713.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018a. A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment: Updated Bioeconomy Strategy. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2018b. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council; Establishing Rules on Support for Strategic Plans to Be Drawn up by Member States under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and Financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and Repealing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Brussels: European Commission, COM(2017) 713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fietz, R. 2012. Die GAP-Reform 2014 aus dem Blickwinkel der betroffenen Landwirte in Deutschland. In Die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik vor neuen Herausforderungen, ed. J. Martinez. 19-ff. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. 1997. The Common Agricultural Policy. New York: St. Martins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Joint Research Centre. 2018. European Commission’s Knowledge Centre for Bioeconomy: Brief on Jobs and Growth of the Bioeconomy 2009–2015. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, A.C.L. 2009. Farmers on Welfare: The Making of Europe’s Common Agricultural Policy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purnhagen, K.P. 2019. The End of Agricultural Exceptionalism in EU Free Movement Law and Competition Law after Lisbon? Wageningen Working Papers of Law and Governance 3/2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purnhagen, K.P., and H. Schebesta. 2017. A Case Moving at the Frontiers of Market Access, Freedom of Goods, the Common Agricultural Policy and Science in Court. European Law Review 42 (3): 420–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, G. 1990. Landwirtschaft ein Ausnahmebereich? Ein alte Frage und eine neue Antwort. Ordo 41: 219–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheingate, A.D. 2001. The Rise of the Agricultural Welfare State. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaak Committee. 1956. The Brussels Report on the General Common Market (Spaak Report). Luxembourg: Information Service High Authority of The European Community for Coal and Steel.

    Google Scholar 

  • SRU. 1985. Umweltprobleme der Landwirtschaft: Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen. Stuttgart/Mainz: Kohlhammer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, M. 1989. Government and Agriculture in Western Europe 1880–1988. 3rd ed. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher, J. 2001. EC Agricultural Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Websites

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Purnhagen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Purnhagen, K., Matthews, A. (2019). European Agriculture and the Bioeconomy: A Historical Overview. In: Dries, L., Heijman, W., Jongeneel, R., Purnhagen, K., Wesseler, J. (eds) EU Bioeconomy Economics and Policies: Volume I. Palgrave Advances in Bioeconomy: Economics and Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28634-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28634-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28633-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28634-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics