Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Non-intubated Video-Assisted Surgery: A Critical Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Anesthesia in Thoracic Surgery

  • 888 Accesses

Abstract

A recent important development in thoracic surgery has been the introduction and widespread employment of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), which minimizes tissue injury, reduces postoperative pain and improves postoperative recovery. Since intraoperative pain is likewise reduced during VATS, less invasive anesthetic approaches during VATS such as avoiding intubation, providing monitored sedation, and maintaining spontaneous breathing during the procedure have been more recently explored and the concept of non-intubated VATS (NI-VATS) has emerged. During NI-VATS, sedatives and regional anesthesia have been used to provide sedation and pain relief during the procedures. Various modes of sedation used during NI-VATS have been shown to keep the patient comfortable while maintaining sufficient spontaneous breathing. Regional anesthesia used has ranged from epidural anesthesia to local anesthesia to intercostal nerves. In some series, local anesthetics have been applied to the vagal nerve to suppress cough during the procedure. Although no large prospective randomized trial has studied the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of NI-VATS, a large number of retrospective studies and some prospective studies show that NI-VATS is a feasible and, when indicated judiciously, a safe method of intraoperative care. Especially for minor VATS, increased turnover times in operating room, improved immediate recovery after surgery and reduction in material costs have been shown for NI-VATS. However, some concerns regarding short- and long-term safety still remain. Short term problems of emergency intubation during the procedure should be expected and considered a major difficult airway challenge. This major safety issue needs team education, possibly simulation, and proper preparation for each and every patient. The range of performable NI-VATS procedures should be determined by level of surgical and anesthetic expertise. Long term safety issues are also important in selecting patients for NI-VATS since properly randomized studies showing reduction of major morbidity and mortality in complex and long operations are lacking. This is especially the case for cancer surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E. Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(2):726–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pompeo E, et al. Non-intubated thoracic surgery-a survey from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(3):37.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Braimbridge MV. The history of thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:610–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Katlic MR, Facktor MA. Video-assisted thoracic surgery utilizing local anesthesia and sedation: 384 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:240–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katlic MR. Five hundred seventy-six cases of video-assisted thoracic surgery using local anesthesia and sedation: lessons learned. J Am Coll Surg. 2018;226(1):58–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mukaida T, et al. Thoracoscopic operation for secondary pneumothorax under local and epidural anesthesia in high-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:924–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pompeo E. State of the art and perspectives in non-intubated thoracic surgery. Ann Transl Med. 2014;2:106.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Gonzalez-Rivas D. Uniportal thoracoscopic surgery: from medical thoracoscopy to non-intubated uniportal video-assisted major pulmonary resections. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;5:85–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hung MH, et al. Nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery: state of the art and future directions. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:2–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bedetti B, et al. Uniportal non-intubated thoracic surgery. J Vis Surg. 2018;4:18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen KC, et al. Nonintubated thoracoscopic surgery using regional anesthesia and vagal block and targeted sedation. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:31–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu J, et al. Non-intubated resection and reconstruction of trachea for the treatment of a mass in the upper trachea. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(3):594–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. David P, et al. Surgical pneumothorax under spontaneous ventilation-effect on oxygenation and ventilation. Ann Transl Med. 2015;8:106.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pompeo E. Pathophysiology of surgical pneumothorax in the awake patient. In: Pompeo E, editor. Awake thoracic surgery. Sharja, U.A.E: Bentham Science Publishers; 2012. p. 9–18.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Triantafillou AN, Benumof J, Lecamwasam HS. Physiology of the lateral decubitus position, the open chest, and one-lung ventilation. In: Kaplan JE, Slinger P, editors. Thoracic anesthesia. Philadelphia: Elsevier Science; 2003. p. 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sticher J, et al. Controlled hypercapnia during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing pulmonary resection. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45(7):842–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cullen DJ, Eger EI II, Gregory GA. The cardiovascular effects of carbon dioxide in man, conscious and during cyclopropane anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1969;31(5):407–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pompeo E, Mineo TC. Awake pulmonary metastasectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:960–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tacconi F, et al. Awake video-assisted pleural decortication for empyema thoracis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:594–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonzalez-Rivas D, et al. Non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resections: the future of thoracic surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:721–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shao W, et al. Non-intubated complete thoracoscopic bronchial sleeve resection for central lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:1485–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Ramirez PT, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(20):1895–904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu J, et al. Nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery under epidural anesthesia compared with conventional anesthetic option: a randomized control study. Surg Innov. 2015;22:123–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Irons JF, et al. Intubated versus nonintubated general anesthesia for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery-a case-control study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31(2):411–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sunaga H, Blasberg JD, Heerdt PM. Anesthesia for nonintubated video-assisted thoracic surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017;30(1):1–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hung MH, et al. Non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery using internal intercostal nerve block, vagal block and targeted sedation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;46:620–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Groeben H. Epidural anesthesia and pulmonary function. J Anesth. 2006;20:290–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Corso RM, et al. The serratus anterior plane block for pediatric non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83(7):775–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hu B, Zhou H, Zou X. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) for non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2018;54:50–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kiss G, Castillo M. Non-intubated anesthesia in thoracic surgery-technical issues. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(8):109.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tokics L, et al. Computerized tomography of the chest and gas exchange measurements during ketamine anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1987;31:684–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Candiotti KA, et al. Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:47–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Iwata Y, Hamai Y, Koyama T. Anesthetic management of nonintubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using epidural anesthesia and dexmedetomidine in three patients with severe respiratory dysfunction. J Anesth. 2016;30(2):324–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang ML, Hung MH, Chen JS, Hsu JS, Cheng YJ. Nasal high-flow oxygen therapy improves arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation in non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2018;53(5):1001–6.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pompeo E. Awake thoracic surgery—is it worth the trouble? Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;24:106–14.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Knoll H, et al. Airway injuries after one-lung ventilation: a comparison between double-lumen tube and endobronchial blocker: a randomized, prospective, controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:471–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Liu H, et al. Tracheobronchial rupture after double-lumen endotracheal intubation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004;18(2):228–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fitzmaurice BG, Brodsky JB. Airway rupture from double-lumen tubes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999;13:322–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ. Left double-lumen tubes: clinical experience with 1,170 patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17:289–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. El-Tahan MR. Videolaryngoscopes for placement of double lumen tubes: is it time to say goodbye to direct view? Saudi J Anaesth. 2016;10(2):218–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Campos JH. Lung isolation techniques for patients with difficult airway. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;23:12–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Collins SR, et al. Lung isolation in the patient with a difficult airway. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(6):1968–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brodsky JB. Lung separation and the difficult airway. Br J Anaesth. 2009;103(Suppl 1):i66–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Klein U, et al. Role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in conjunction with the use of double-lumen tubes for thoracic anesthesia: a prospective study. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:346–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hedenstierna G, Edmark L. Protective ventilation during anesthesia. Is it meaningful? Anesthesiology. 2016;125:1079–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim SH, et al. Application of intraoperative lung-protective ventilation varies in accordance with the knowledge of anaesthesiologists: a single-centre questionnaire study and a retrospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2018;18(1):33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Licker M, et al. Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Crit Care. 2009;13:R41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Fuchs-Buder T, Nemes R, Schmartz D. Residual neuromuscular blockade: management and impact on postoperative pulmonary outcome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016;29(6):662–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Brueckmann B, et al. Effects of sugammadex on incidence of postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade: a randomized, controlled study. Br J Anaesth. 2015;115(5):743–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Tacconi F, et al. Surgical stress hormones response is reduced after awake videothoracoscopy. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10:666–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Vanni G, et al. Impact of awake videothoracoscopic surgery on postoperative lymphocyte responses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:973–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ambrogi V, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery colorectal lung metastasectomy in non-intubated anesthesia. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(2):254–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Mineo TC, et al. Immunological and inflammatory impact of non-intubated lung metastasectomy. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(7):E1466.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Tacconi F, Pompeo E. Non-intubated video-assisted thoracic surgery: where does evidence stand? J Thorac Dis. 2016;8(Suppl 4):S364–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Navarro-Martinez J, et al. Intraoperative crisis resource management during a non-intubated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(8):111.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Galvez C, et al. Nonintubated uniportal VATS pulmonary anatomical resections. J Vis Surg. 2017;3:120.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany

    Waheedullah Karzai

  2. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, Zentralklinik Bad Berka, Bad Berka, Germany

    Waheedullah Karzai

  3. Clinical Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Mojca Drnovsek Globokar

  4. University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Tomaž Štupnik

  5. Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Tomaž Štupnik

Authors
  1. Waheedullah Karzai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mojca Drnovsek Globokar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tomaž Štupnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Waheedullah Karzai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Consorcio Hospital General Universitario, Valencia, Spain

    Manuel Granell Gil

  2. Istanbul Medical Faculty, Department of Anaesthesiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Mert Şentürk

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Karzai, W., Globokar, M.D., Štupnik, T. (2020). Non-intubated Video-Assisted Surgery: A Critical Review. In: Granell Gil, M., Şentürk, M. (eds) Anesthesia in Thoracic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28528-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28528-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28527-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28528-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation