Skip to main content

Abstract

Postnormal science is an epistemological approach to understand and hopefully help in the solution of societal problems accepting the perspectives of the many social actors that participate in them. Its fundamental characteristics are the acceptance of the uncertainty of facts, disputed values, and the urgency of the decision-making processes. The social-ecological system concept, on the other hand, was proposed as a better way to recognize, study, and manage the relationships between human beings and ecosystems. In this chapter, we discuss both concepts, based on the idea that social-ecological systems should be studied using a postnormal perspective. We provide an example of the study of a Latin American social-ecological system: the Rio Cruces wetland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/us/definition/english/science?q=science

  2. 2.

    http://webofknowledge.com

  3. 3.

    https://deskgram.net/explore/tags/cisnecuellonegro

  4. 4.

    http://www.comunidadhumedal.cl/

  5. 5.

    http://www.cehum.org/english/

References

  • Ainscough J, Wilson M, Kenter JO (2018) Ecosystem services as a post-normal field of science. Ecosyst Serv 31:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balvanera P, Uriarte M, Almeida-Leñero L et al (2012) Ecosystem services in Latin America: the state of the art. Ecosyst Serv 2:56–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems for resilience and sustainability. In: Berkes F, Folke C (eds) Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2003) Introduction. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social-ecological systems. Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder CR, Hinkel J, Bots PWG et al (2013) Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 18(4):26. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05551-180426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campuzano FJ, Mateus MD, Leitão PC et al (2013) Integrated coastal zone management in South America: a look at three contrasting systems. Ocean Coast Manag 72:22–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Pingali PL, Bennett EM et al (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: scenarios, vol 2. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu D, Strand R, Fjelland R (2003) Theories of complexity: common denominators of complex systems. Complexity 8:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL) (1999) Latin America: total, urban and rural population and urban percentage, by quinquennium and countries. Demographic Bulletin N° 63. https://www.cepal.org/celade/publica/bol63/Bd6311.html. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

  • Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL) (2016) La población de América Latina ancanzará 625 millones de personas en 2016, según estimaciones de la CEPAL. https://www.cepal.org/es/noticias/la-poblacion-america-latina-alcanzara-625-millones-personas-2016-segun-estimaciones-la. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

  • Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF) (2018) Informe monitoreo avifauna Marzo 2018. Santuario de la Naturaleza Carlos Anwandter. http://www.conaf.cl/cms/editorweb/rio_cruces/informes/Marzo-2018.pdf. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

  • Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF) (2019) Parques de Chile. http://wwwconafcl/parques-nacionales/parques-de-chile/. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

  • Delgado LE, Marín VH (2013) Interannual changes in the habitat area of the black-necked swan, Cygnus melancoryphus, in the Carlos Anwandter sanctuary, southern Chile: a remote sensing approach. Wetlands 33:91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado LE, Marín VH (2016) Well-being and the use of ecosystem services by rural households of the Río Cruces watershed, southern Chile. Ecosyst Serv 21:81–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado LE, Tironi A, Vila I et al (2014) El humedal del Río Cruces, Valdivia, Chile: una síntesis ecosistémica. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 42:937–949

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado LE, Marín VH, Bachmann PL et al (2009) Conceptual models for ecosystem management through the participation of local social actors: the Río cruces wetland conflict. Ecol Soc 14(1):50. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art50. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado LE, Sepúlveda MB, Marín VH (2013) Provision of ecosystem services by the Aysén watershed, Chilean Patagonia, to rural households. Ecosyst Serv 5:102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Serrano M, Oteros-Rozas E, Vanwildemeersch P et al (2015) Local perceptions on social-ecological dynamics in Latin America in three community-based natural resource management systems. Ecol Soc 20(4):24. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07965-200424. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denevan WM (1992) The native population of the Americas in 1492. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency UE (EEA) (1999) Environmental indicators: typology and overview. Technical report n. 25, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1992) Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, Westport, pp 251–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Geymonat L (2006) Historia de la filosofía y de la ciencia. Crítica, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Giusti EM, Castelnuovo G, Molinari E (2017) Differences in multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary treatment programs for fibromyalgia: a mapping review. Pain Res Manag 2017:1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7261468. Accessed 8 June 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS (2002) Panarchy. Understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (2014) Complexity. A very short introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo E, Lagos NA, Labra FA et al (2018) Recovery of black-necked swans, macrophytes and water quality in a Ramsar wetland of southern Chile: assessing resilience following sudden anthropogenic disturbances. Sci Total Environ 628-629:291–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kay J (2000) Ecosystems as self-organizing Holarchic open systems: narratives and the second law of thermodynamics. In: Jorgensen SE, Muller F (eds) Handbook of ecosystems theories and management. CRC, Boca Ratón, pp 135–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortenkamp K, Moore CF (2001) Ecocentrism and anthropocentrism: moral reasoning about ecological commons dilemmas. J Environ Psychol 21:261–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1999) Pandora’s hope. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewison RL, Rudd MA, Al-Hayek W et al (2016) How the DPSIR framework can be used for structuring problems and facilitating empirical research in coastal systems. Environ Sci Policy 56:110–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín VH, Tironi A, Delgado LE et al (2009) On the sudden disappearance of Egeria densa from a Ramsar wetland site of Southern Chile: A climatic event trigger model. Ecological Modelling 220 (15):1752–1763

    Google Scholar 

  • Marín VH, Delgado LE (2013) From ecology to society and back: the (in)convenient hypothesis syndrome. Int J Sustain Dev 16:46–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marín VH, Delgado LE, Tironi-Silva A et al (2018) Exploring social-ecological complexities of wetlands of international importance (Ramsar sites): the Carlos Anwandter Sanctuary (Valdivia, Chile) as a case study. Wetlands 38:1171–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClenachan L, Lovell S, Keaveney C (2015) Social benefits of restoring historical ecosystems and fisheries: alewives in Maine. Ecol Soc 20(2):31. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07585-200231. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis MD, Ostrom E (2014) Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecol Soc 19(2):30. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Morandín Ahuermal I, Contreras-Hernádez A, Ayala Ortiz DA et al (2018) Complexity and transdiscipline: epistemologies for sustainability. Madera y Bosques. https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2018.2431673. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

  • OECD (2019) Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. http://www.oecd.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes N (2018) Transparency rule is a Trojan horse. Nature 557:469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl C (2008) From science to policy through transdisciplinary research. Environ Sci Policy 11:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preiser R, Biggs R, De Vos A et al (2018) Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches. Ecol Soc 23(4):46. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10558-230446. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiñones D, Caro J, Marín VH et al (2017) Manejo resiliente de cuencas forestales de Chile: La cuenca de Cayucupil (Cañete) como caso de estudio. Boletín Nahuelbuta Natural 1:7–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsar (1998) Ficha Informativa de los Humedales de Ramsar. Santuario de la Naturaleza e Investigación Científica “Carlos Anwandter” del río Cruces, Valdivia. https://rsisramsarorg/ris/222. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

  • Rogers KH, Luton R, Biggs H et al (2013) Fostering complexity thinking in action research for change in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 18(2):31. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05330-180231. Accessed 8 Jun 2019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltelli A, Funtowicz S (2017) What is science’s crisis really about? Futures 91:5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz O (2010) Resolving ecosystem complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schoon M, van der Leeuw S (2015) The shift toward social-ecological systems perspectives: insights into human-nature relationship. Nat Sci Soc 23:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sepulveda-Luque C (2018) Bringing animals within political communities: the citizens/swans association that fractured Chile’s environmental framework. Soc Mov Stud 17(3):333–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urquiza A, Amigo C, Billi M et al (2018) Metálogo como herramienta de colaboración transdisciplinaria. Cinta Moebio 62:182–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarrow M, Marín VH, Finlayson M et al (2009) The ecology of Egeria densa Planchón (Liliopsida: Alismatales): A wetland ecosystem engineer? Revista chilena de historia natural 82:299–313

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work contained in this chapter was financed by CONICYT-Chile FONDECYT Grant N° 1170532 awarded to L. Delgado.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Víctor H. Marín .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marín, V.H., Marín, I.A., Delgado, L.E. (2019). Postnormal Science and Social-ecological Systems. In: Delgado, L., Marín, V. (eds) Social-ecological Systems of Latin America: Complexities and Challenges. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28452-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics