Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Additive Manufacturing (AM) and WMD Proliferation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disruptive and Game Changing Technologies in Modern Warfare

  • 798 Accesses

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) or 3D printing technology is a rising industry with applications that traverse all sectors of the economy. A variety of users can use 3D printing commercially or recreationally to make objects in plastic and metal, thus it has caused concern among the nuclear proliferation community in its dual-use capability to help acquisition by non-weapons states or non-state actors. Despite the concern, current AM capabilities give little cause for alarm. What AM possesses in flexibility, it lacks in depth; AM has limitations in size, material strength, and cost of objects compared to traditional manufacturing methods. Spread of sensitive nuclear technologies is not possible with the technology in the near future. Delivery systems are more worrisome yet their actualization probability remains low. The United States and international community should work together to continually examine AM capabilities in the near term and begin to update export control mechanisms, re-examine signatures of proliferation for the intelligence community, and promote collaborative efforts between the AM technical community and the public sector to alert of disruptive ability of the technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mattox JM (2013) Additive manufacturing and its implications for military ethics. J Mil Ethics 10(3):225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schwab K (2016) The Fourth Industrial Revolution: what it means, how to respond. World Economic Forum, 14 Jan 2016. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-what-it-means-and-how-to-respond/

  3. Bloem J et al (2014) The Fourth Industrial Revolution: things to tighten the link between IT OT. VINT Research Report, Sogeti. https://www.fr.sogeti.com/globalassets/global/downloads/reports/vint-research-3-the-fourth-industrial-revolution

  4. Petrick IJ, Simpson TW (2015) 3D printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition. Res-Technol Manag 56(6):12–16

    Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell TA, Ivanova OS (2013) Additive manufacturing as a disruptive technology: implications of three-dimensional printing. Technol Innov 15(1):67–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Price compare—3D printing materials—Filament Finder. 3D printing from scratch (2019). http://3dprintingfromscratch.com/3d-printer-filament-finder/

  7. 3D Printing Materials: Printing Sizes. i.materialize (2019). https://i.materialise.com/3d-printing-materials/printing-sizes

  8. Thingiverse (2019). http://www.thingiverse.com/. Accessed 14 Feb 2019

  9. YouMagine (2019). https://www.youmagine.com/. Accessed 14 Feb 2019

  10. Tinkercad. https://www.tinkercad.com/. Accessed 14 Feb 2019

  11. Jackson R et al (2016) Overview of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory Advanced Manufacturing Integrated Energy Demonstration Project: case study of additive manufacturing as a tool to enable rapid innovation in integrated energy systems. ASME 2016 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition, vol 14, Nov 2016

    Google Scholar 

  12. Werner D (2018) Lockheed Martin extends additive manufacturing to key spacecraft components. Space News (2018). https://spacenews.com/lockheed-martin-extends-additive-manufacturing-to-key-spacecraft-components/

  13. To Print a Missile: Raytheon Research Points to 3-D Printing for Tomorrow’s Technology. Raytheon, Apr 2016. http://www.raytheon.com/news/feature/3d_printing.html

  14. 3D Printed Shelby Cobra. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. http://web.ornl.gov/sci/manufacturing/shelby/

  15. Feuer A (2015) Cody Wilson, who posted gun instructions online, Sues State Department. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/07/us/cody-wilson-who-posted-gun-instructions-online-sues-state-department.html

  16. Defense Distributed vs. United States Department of State. Fifth Circuit 2016, Harvard Law Review, Apr 2017. https://harvardlawreview.org/2017/04/defense-distributed-v-united-states-department-of-state/

  17. Jain PK, Pandey PM, Rao PVM (2009) Effect of delay time on part strength in selective laser sintering. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 43(2009):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. The US National Security Strategy. The White House, Feb 2015. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strategy_2.pdf

  19. Kroenig M, Volpe T (2015) 3-D printing the bomb? The nuclear nonproliferation challenge. Wash Q 38(3):7–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. How 3D Printers Work. US Department of Energy. http://www.energy.gov/articles/how-3d-printers-work. Accessed 19 June 2014

  21. Gress D, Kalafsky R (2015) Geographies of production in 3D: theoretical and research implications stemming from additive manufacturing. Geoforum 60:43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Walther G (2015) Printing insecurity? The security implications of 3D-printing weapons. J Sci Eng Ethics 21:1435–1445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9617-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McNulty M et al (2012) Toward the printed world: additive manufacturing and implications for national security. Institute of National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, Sept 2012

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lothringer D et al Countering weapons of mass destruction: a preliminary field study in improving collaboration. Naval Postgraduate School, Mar 2016

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huang Y et al (2015) Additive manufacturing: current state, future potential, gaps and needs, and recommendation. J Manuf Sci Eng 137(1):014001–014001-10

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tirone D, Gilley J (2015) Printing power: 3-D printing and threats to state security. J Polic Intell Count Terror 10(2):102–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Walther G (2015) Printing insecurity? The security implications of 3D-printing weapons. J Sci Eng Ethics 21:1435–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Albright D (2018) Technical note: making sense out of the IR-8 centrifuge. Institute for Science and International Security, 23 Sept 2018. http://isis-online.org/uploads/isis-reports/documents/IR8_Sept__2014.pdf

  29. Guidelines for Nuclear Transfers (2015) Nuclear Suppliers Group, June 2015. http://www.nuclearsuppliersgroup.org/images/Files/Updated_control_lists/Bariloche/NSG_Part1Rev.13_clean.pdf

  30. Manfredi D et al (2012) From powders to dense metal parts: characterization of a commercial AlSiMg allow processed through direct metal laser sintering. Materials 6(3):856–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Albright D, Hinderstein C (2010) Unraveling the AQ Khan and future proliferation networks. Wash Q 28(2):109–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Natanz Enrichment Complex. Nuclear threat initiative. http://www.nti.org/learn/facilities/170/. Accessed 7 July 2017

  33. Zentner MD, Coles GA, Talbert RJ (2005) Nuclear proliferation technology trends analysis. US Department of Energy, Office of Scientific and Technical Information, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Sept 2005. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/885472-nuclear-proliferation-technology-trends-analysis

  34. Hautecouverte B (2009) A possible international regime to cover radiological materials. Centre d’Études de Sécurité Internationale et de Maîtrise des armements. https://inis.iaea.org/collection/NCLCollectionStore/_Public/48/018/48018671.pdf

  35. Annex on Chemicals. Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. https://www.opcw.org/chemical-weapons-convention/annexes/annex-chemicals/annex-chemicals

  36. Toxicological Profile for Sulfur Mustard. Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control, Sept 2003. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp49.pdf

  37. Kabalnow A et al (2017) Three-dimensional (3D) printing. Hewlett Packard Development Company, L.C. WO Patent App. PCT/US2015/041,961, Feb 2017

    Google Scholar 

  38. Technologies Underlying Weapons of Mass Destruction (1993) US Office of Technology Assessment, OTA-BP-ISC-115. US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chemical and Biological Weapons: The Poor Man’s Bomb. Federation of American Scientists, Intelligence Resource Program, Oct 1996. https://fas.org/irp/threat/an253stc.htm

  40. Tucker J (1998) Verification provisions of the chemical weapons convention and their relevance to the biological weapons convention. In: Biological weapons proliferation: reasons for concern, courses of action. The Henry L. Stimson Center, pp 76–104

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gross B et al (2014) Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem 86(7):3240–3253. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ac403397r

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Nishiyama Y et al (2008) Development of a three-dimensional bioprinter: construction of cell supporting structures using hydrogel and state-of-the-art inkjet technology. J Biomech Eng 131(3):035001-6. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3002759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Connell J, Ritschdorff ET, Whiteley M, Shear JB (2013) 3D printing of microscopic bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci (PNAS) 110(46):18380–18385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Cheng Y-A, Li M (2010) Get to know supergerms better. Chin J Dermatovenerol 24:1081–1083

    Google Scholar 

  45. Technologies Underlying Weapons of Mass Destruction. US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, OTA-BP-ISC-115. US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., Dec 1993

    Google Scholar 

  46. Alle P (2016) Brussels terror suspect who was shot by police at tram stop had rucksack containing animal testicles and faeces, prompting fears ISIS is planning crude biological attack on food supplies. Daily Mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3529865/Brussels-terror-suspect-shot-police-tram-stop-rucksack-containing-animal-testicles-faeces-prompting-fears-ISIS-planning-crude-biological-attack-food-supplies.html

  47. Berlinger J (2017) North Korea’s missile tests: what you need to know. CNN, 3 Dec 2017. http://www.cnn.com/2017/05/29/asia/north-korea-missile-tests/index.html

  48. Armament Technologies. Defence Research and Development Organisation, Aug 2012

    Google Scholar 

  49. Laub Z (2016) The Islamic State. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/islamic-state. Accessed 10 Aug 2016

  50. Matthews M et al (2016) Denudation of metal powder layers in laser powder bed fusion process. Acta Meterialia 114(1):33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Power Bed Fusion. Additive Manufacturing Research Group, Loughborough University (2019). http://www.lboro.ac.uk/research/amrg/about/the7categoriesofadditivemanufacturing/powderbedfusion/

  52. Thomas D, Gilbert S (2014) Costs and cost effectiveness of additive manufacturing: a literature review and discussion. Applied Economics Office Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Dec 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1176

  53. Shivali B (2016) World’s first 3D printed plane unveiled: airbus’ windowless ‘Thor’ aircraft could pave the way for cheaper and faster flights. Daily Mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3627187/World-s-3D-printed-plane-unveiled-Airbus-windowless-Thor-aircraft-pave-way-cheaper-faster-flights.html. Accessed 6 June 2016

  54. Medical Aspects of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Editor in Chief, Brigadier General Russ Zajtchuk. Office of The Surgeon General Department of the Army, Bethesda, United States of America (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Montgomery A (2005) Ringing in proliferation: how to dismantle an atomic bomb network. Int Secur 30(2):153–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Revill J, Jefferson C (2014) Tacit knowledge and the biological weapons regime. Sci Public Policy 41(5):597–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Collins H (2012) Expert systems and the science of knowledge. In: Bijker WE, Hughes TP, Pinch T (eds) The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. MIT Press, Boston, pp 321–348

    Google Scholar 

  58. Vogel K (2006) Bioweapons proliferation: where science studies and public policy collide. Soc Stud Sci 36(5):659–690. 706059460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Hoskins S (2014) Issues of tacit knowledge within 3D printing for artists, designers and makers. In: NIP & digital fabrication conference, vol 30, pp 426–431. http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/id/eprint/23449

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Andrew Conant

Authors
  1. Andrew Conant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Conant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Sam Nunn School of International Affairs, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Margaret E. Kosal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Conant, A. (2020). Additive Manufacturing (AM) and WMD Proliferation. In: Kosal, M. (eds) Disruptive and Game Changing Technologies in Modern Warfare. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28342-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation