Skip to main content

Robotic/Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Female Pelvic Surgery
  • 815 Accesses

Abstract

The demand for surgical correction of pelvic organ prolapse is expected to grow as the population ages yet remains active and focused on quality of life. Definitive correction of pelvic organ prolapse can be accomplished through both vaginal and abdominal approaches. Patient factors and preferences as well as surgeon experience and comfort often dictate the nature and extent of the repair. While there is no universally accepted “ideal” approach, the preponderance of data cites the superiority of abdominal sacrocolpopexy (ASC) in the durable correction of apical and multicompartment prolapse. Unfortunately, the “gold standard” open ASC is comparatively morbid and both patients and providers have trended toward transvaginal reconstruction, particularly during the era of seemingly simplistic “mesh-based kits.” The application of robotics and the pervasive concern regarding the transvaginal placement of synthetic mesh have revitalized and emboldened sacrocolpopexy. This chapter serves as a contemporary reference that specifically addresses the rationale, diagnostic algorithm, and therapeutic options for the treatment of female pelvic organ prolapse. Emphasis will be placed on the role and technique of abdominal-based reconstruction using a minimally invasive approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, et al. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams SR, Dramitinos P, Shapiro A, et al. Do patient goals vary with degree of prolapse? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, et al. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(4):CD004014.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nygaard IE, McCreery R, Brubaker L, et al. Abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a comprehensive review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mueller ER. Why complex pelvic organ prolapse should be approached abdominally. Curr Opin Urol. 2013;23:317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Rackley RR, et al. Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:1752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elterman DS, Chughtai BI, Vertosick E, et al. Changes in pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the last decade among United States Urologists. J Urol. 2014;191:1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175(1):10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Richardson ML, Elliott CS, Shaw JG, et al. To sling or not to sling at time of abdominal sacrocolpopexy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Urol. 2013;190:1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clarke-Pearson DL, Abaid LN. Prevention of venous thromboembolic events after gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;199:155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geller EJ, Parnell BA, Dunivan GC. Robotic vs abdominal sacrocolpopexy: 44-month pelvic floor outcomes. Urology. 2012;79:532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee RK, Mottrie A, Payne CK, et al. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Eur Urol. 2014 Jun;65(6):1128–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Serati M, Bogani G, Sorice P, et al. Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2014;66(2):303–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Judd JP, Siddiqui NY, Barnett JC, et al. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elliott CS, Hsieh MH, Sokol ER, et al. Robot-assisted versus open sacrocolpopexy: a cost-minimization analysis. J Urol. 2012;187:638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoyte L, Rabbanifard R, Mezzick J, et al. Cost analysis of open versus robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2012;18:335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Paraiso MF, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, et al. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2011;118:1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Anger JT, Mueller ER, Tarnay C, et al. Robotic compared with laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: a Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wesley M. White .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

White, W.M., Polin, M. (2020). Robotic/Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy. In: Firoozi, F. (eds) Female Pelvic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28319-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28319-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28318-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28319-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics