Abstract
This paper discusses the recuperation of emancipatory principles of the maker culture in the context of labor organization. By examining an event for prototyping (the ‘makeathon’), the paper illustrates how emancipatory demands were co-opted in capitalist innovation processes. Makeathons represent the recuperation of emancipation as they provide testing fields for organizing innovation labor differently. They are connected to the maker culture that calls for autonomous physical labor, collaborative communities and personal authority over technological knowledge. Yet, industrial companies have started to adopt such events for changing current innovation processes. The paper argues that the recuperation is mediated by the introduction of organizational control, collective control and self-control. The makeathon can be interpreted as an instance for the manufacturing of consent that might entail new and often conflicting work requirements.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Banks, M. (2010). Craft Labor and Creative Industries. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 16(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630903055885.
Bauwens, M., & Vasilis, K. (2014). From the Communism of Capital to Capital for the Commons: Towards an Open Co-operativism. TripleC, 12(1), 356–361.
Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-Based Peer Production and Virtue. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394–419.
Bennett, J., & Strange, N. (Eds.). (2015). Media Independence: Working with Freedom or Working for Free? New York, NY: Routledge.
Böhmer, A., Beckmann, A., & Lindemann, U. (2015, December). Open Innovation Ecosystem: Makerspaces Within an Agile Innovation Process. Paper Presented at the ISPIM Innovation Summit, Brisbane, Australia.
Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, È. (2007). The New Spirit of Capitalism. London and New York: Verso.
Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (25th Anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
Briken, K., Chillas, S., & Krzywdzinski, M. (2017). The New Digital Workplace: How New Technologies Revolutionise Work. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process Under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago, IL: University Press of Chicago.
Burawoy, M. (1985). The Politics of Production: Factory Regimes Under Capitalism and Socialism. London: Verso.
Dahlander, L., & Magnusson, M. G. (2005). Relationships Between Open Source Software Companies and Communities: Observations from Nordic Firms. Research Policy, 34(4), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.02.003.
Delfanti, A. (2014). Is Do-It-Yourself Biology Being Co-opted by Institutions? UC Davis Previously Published Works. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4nz3p0hf.
Dickel, S., Schneider, C., Thiem, C., & Wenten, K.-A. (2019). Engineering Publics: The Different Modes of Civic Technoscience. Science and Technology Studies, 32(2), 8–23.
Dickel, S., & Schrape, J.-F. (2015). Dezentralisierung, Demokratisierung, Emanzipation: Zur Architektur des digitalen Technikutopismus. Leviathan, 43(3), 442–463.
Dolata, U., & Schrape, J.-F. (Eds.). (2018). Kollektivität und Macht im Internet: Soziale Bewegungen - Open Source Communities - Internetkonzerne. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Dougherty, D. (Author) (2011, January). We Are Makers [Television Broadcast]. TED Talk. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/dale_dougherty_we_are_makers.
Dougherty, D. (2012). The Maker Movement. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00135.
Drewlani, T., & Seibt, D. (2018). Configuring the Independent Developer. Journal of Peer Production, Issue 12: Makerspaces and Institutions (12). Retrieved from http://peerproduction.net/editsuite/issues/issue-12-makerspaces-and-institutions/peer-reviewed-papers/configuring-the-independent-developer/.
Frayssé, O., & O’Neil, M. (Eds.). (2015). Digital Labor and Prosumer Capitalism: The US Matrix. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital Labor and Karl Marx. New York: Routledge.
Gauntlett, D. (2011). Making Is Connecting: The Social Meaning of Creativity from DIY and Knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Harhoff, D., & Lakhani, K. R. (2016). Revolutionizing Innovation: Users, Communities, and Open Innovation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Hatch, M. (2014). The Maker Movement Manifesto: Rules for Innovation in the New World of Crafters, Hackers, and Tinkerers. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
Hippel, E. V. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from http://mit.edu/evhippel/www/books/DI/DemocInn.pdf.
Hostettler, R., & Böhmer, A. (2018). Experience TAF. Retrieved from https://taf.expert/experience/.
Huws, U. (2010). Schöpfung und Enteignung: Die Dialektik von Autonomie und Kontrolle in der kreativen Arbeit. Standpunkte, 38(38), 1–6.
Huws, U. (2014). Labor in the Global Digital Economy: The Cybertariat Comes of Age. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press.
Irani, L. (2015). Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship. Science, Technology and Human Values, 40(5), 799–824.
Kalff, Y. (2018). Organisierendes Arbeiten. Bielefeld: transcript.
Kröger, M. (2018, February 15). Mobileye, Nvidia und Co. Diese Start-ups erfinden die Zukunft des Autos. Spiegel Online. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/unternehmen/autoindustrie-so-treiben-start-ups-daimler-bmw-und-co-vor-sich-her-a-1193319.html.
Lee, D. (2013). Creative Labor in the Cultural Industries. Sociopedia.Isa, 1–13.
Lindtner, S., & Avle, S. (2017). Tinkering with Governance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 1(CSCW), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134705.
Lindtner, S., Hertz, G. D., & Dourish, P. (2014). Emerging Sites of HCI Innovation: Hackerspaces, Hardware Startups & Incubators. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 439–448). New York, NY: ACM.
Mason, P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A Guide to Our Future. New York, NY: Penguin Random House.
Maxigas. (2017). Hackers Against Technology: Critique and Recuperation in Technological Cycles. Social Studies of Science, 47(6), 841–860. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717736387.
Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken (11., aktual. u. überarb. Aufl). Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.
Menichinelli, M., Bianchini, M., Carosi, A., & Maffei, S. (2017). Makers as a New Work Condition Between Self-Employment and Community Peer-Production: Insights from a Survey on Makers in Italy. Journal of Peer Production (10). Retrieved from http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-10-peer-production-and-work/peer-reviewed-papers/makers-as-a-new-work-condition-between-self-employment-and-community-peer-production-insights-from-a-survey-on-makers-in-italy/.
Mota, C. (2011). The Rise of Personal Fabrication. In C&C ‘11 Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Creativity and Cognition. New York, NY: ACM.
P2P Foundation. (2012). Synthetic Overview of the Collaborative Economy. Amsterdam: P2P Foundation.
Pfeiffer, S., Schütt, P., & Wühr, D. (Eds.). (2012). Smarte Innovation: Ergebnisse und neue Ansätze im Maschinen- und Anlagenbau. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Richardson, M. (2016). Pre-hacked: Open Design and the Democratisation of Product Development. New Media & Society, 18(4), 653–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816629476.
Smith, A., Hielscher, S., Dickel, S., Söderberg, J., & van Oost, E. (2013). Grassroots Digital Fabrication and Makerspaces: Reconfiguring, Relocating and Recalibrating Innovation? (SPRU Working Paper Series; No. 2013–02). Brighton: SPRU, Science and Technology Policy Research.
Söderberg, J., & Delfanti, A. (2015a). Hacking Hacked!: The Life Cycles of Digital Innovation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 40(5), 793–798.
Söderberg, J., & Delfanti, A. (2015b). Repurposing the Hacker: Three Temporalities of Recuperation. UC Davis Previsouly Published Works, 1–22. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/9c86493g.
Stangler, D., & Maxwell, K. (2012). DIY Producer Society. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 7(3), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1162/INOV_a_00134.
Troxler, P., & Maxigas. (2014). We Now Have the Means of Production, But Where Is My Revolution? Journal of Peer Production (5). Retrieved from http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/editorial-section/editorial-note-we-now-have-the-means-of-production-but-where-is-my-revolution/.
Turner, F. (2006). From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Wark, M. (2004). A Hacker Manifesto. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Chesbrough, H. (2014). Open Innovation: The Next Decade. Research Policy, 43(5), 805–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.001.
Zukin, S., & Papadantonakis, M. (2017). Hackathons as Co-optation Ritual: Socializing Workers and Institutionalizing Innovation in the “New” Economy. In A. Kalleberg & S. Vallas (Eds.), Precarious Work: Research in the Sociology of Work (31st ed., pp. 157–181). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wenten, KA. (2019). Controlling Labor in Makeathons: On the Recuperation of Emancipation in Industrial Labor Processes. In: Meyer, U., Schaupp, S., Seibt, D. (eds) Digitalization in Industry. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28258-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28257-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28258-5
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)