Abstract
During the 1960–1980 period, Turkish law had accepted conciliation in collective interests disputes resolution. However, after 1980, it has abandoned conciliation and predicated on the mediation system. Accordingly, mediation has replaced previous conciliation in terms of collective interests disputes. Hence, individuals that had previously been assigned under the name of ‘impartial mediator’ and had become meaningless and posed an obstacle against settlement has been left outside the mediation process. Mediation activity now pertains to the mediator as a single person.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aydın, U. (2004). From the Taft-Hartley Act to Turkish industrial relations-postponement of legal strikes: A legal borrowing case. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 25(3), 365–390.
Subaşı, İ. (2003). Toplu İş Hukukunda Arabuluculuk. In Bilgi Toplumunda Hukuk. Ünal Tekinalp’e Armağan (vol. 2, pp. 733–833). Istanbul, Turkey: Beta Publishing.
Tunçomağ, K., & Centel, T. (2016). İş Hukukunun Esasları (8th ed.). Istanbul, Turkey: Beta Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Centel, T. (2019). Mediation in Collective Interests Disputes. In: Labour Dispute Resolution in Turkey. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28215-8_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28215-8_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28214-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28215-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)