Skip to main content

Erosion Control Service of Forest Ecosystems: A Case Study from Northeastern Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Geography

Part of the book series: Key Challenges in Geography ((KCHGE))

Abstract

Erosion is one of the most significant environmental problems in Turkey and many other regions of the world. Thus, appropriate erosion control services can help reduce soil loss and maintain ecosystem services (ES). Forests play a crucial role in this process as they are very useful in erosion control when properly managed. This chapter depicts a case of erosion control service in a forest ecosystem in northeastern Turkey by assessing statistical relationships of soil properties with forest inventory data through field observations, direct measurements and calculated data of growing stock, basal area, and soil erodibility (K-factor) from 108 forest plots. We found several significant correlations between those factors and in particular tree density, basal area, stand age, layered forest structure, stand height, undergrowth, and species composition along with some ecological parameters proofed to be useful indicators for a quick assessment of erosion control ES of forests. Erosion rates could be reduced by increasing the number of trees per unit area with smart forest management. It seems that optimum species composition can easily be achieved through the presence of the broadleaved trees ES indicator. Because mixed forests generally had lower silt content in their soil, they seem to be less prone to erosion processes. This case study helped to identify the site-specific key indicators for assessing erosion control ES as well as potential mitigation strategies for forest ecosystems in northeastern Turkey. It also showed that a single proxy indicator might not sufficiently represent such complex processes. Thus, the use of a bundle of indicators may result in more accurate estimates. For a more general assessment, sound ES indicators still need to be developed on regional or national level for decision-makers and practitioners to make wise decisions and proper land allocations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron J 54:464–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun D, Damm A, Hein L, Petchey OL, Schaepman ME (2018) Spatio-temporal trends and trade-offs in ecosystem services: an earth observation based assessment for Switzerland between 2004 and 2014. Ecol Ind 89:828–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard B, Maes J (eds) (2017) Mapping ecosystem services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, Müller F (2014) Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands – concepts for spatial localization, indication and quantification. Landsc Online 34:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttafuoco G, Conforti M, Aucelli PPC, Robustelli G, Scarciglia F (2012) Assessing spatial uncertainty in mapping soil erodibility factor using geostatistical stochastic simulation. Environ Earth Sci 66:1111–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Caraco NF, Correll DL, Howarth RW, Sharpley AN, Smith VH (1998) Nonpoint pollution of surface waters with phosphorus and nitrogen. Ecol Appl 8:559–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CDE (2015) Watershed rehabilitation projects in Turkey. General directorate of combating desertification and erosion, Ankara. https://cem.gov.tr. Accessed 13 Jan 2019

  • CEC (2006) Thematic strategy for soil protection. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium COM 2006/231

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPF (2003) Caucasus biodiversity hotspot (Ecosystem profile final version). Critical ecosystem partnership fund, 31 July 2003 (updated: September 2014). https://www.cepf.net/sites/default/files/final.caucasus.ep_.pdf. Accessed 22 Dec 2018

  • Cerdan O, Govers G, Le Bissonnais Y, Van Oost K, Poesen J, Saby N, Gobin A, Vacca A, Quinton J, Auerswald K, Klik A, Kwaad FJPM, Raclot D, Ionita I, Rejman J, Rousseva S, Muxart T, Roxo MJ, Dostal T (2010) Rates and spatial variations of soil erosion in Europe: a study based on erosion plot data. Geomorphology 122:167–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çepel N (2007) The relationship between forests and erosion. http://docplayer.biz.tr/9720254-Orman-erozyon-iliskisi.html. Accessed 13 Dec 2018

  • Duman A (2017) Determination and modelling of soil properties of degraded forest and grassland areas in some micro catchments of Artvin, Erzurum and Bayburt using satellite images. Dissertation, Artvin Coruh University

    Google Scholar 

  • Egoh B, Drakou EG, Dunbar MB, Maes J, Willemen L (2012) Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review. Technical report, JRC Scientific and Policy Reports, Publications Office of the EU, Luxemburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekinci D (2005) Erosion analysis of Kozlu River Basin with the GIS based modified RUSLE method (in Turkish). J Geogr (e-ISSN:1305-2128) 13:109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (2013) Stormwater to street trees: engineering urban forests for stormwater management guide. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Nonpoint Source Control Branch, Washington, DC, p 4. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-11/documents/stormwater2streettrees.pdf. Accessed 23 Dec 2018

  • FAO (1992) Forests, trees and food. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/docrep/006/u5620e/U5620E05.htm#P329_43749. Accessed 22 Dec 2018

  • GDA (2007) Action plan for afforestation and erosion control campaign (2008–2012) (in Turkish). Ministry of Environment and Forestry, General Directorate of Afforestation and Erosion Control, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • GDEA (2012) General Directorate of Energy Affairs. http://www.coruhhavzasi.com/12-proje-alani.html. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  • GDF (2017) Act No 299 (in Turkish). General Directorate of Forestry, Forest Management and Planning Dept, Ankara. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/ekutuphane/Tebligler. Accessed 13 Jan 2019

  • Guerra CA, Teresa PC, Marc JM (2014) Mapping soil erosion prevention using an ecosystem service modeling framework for integrated land management and policy. Ecosystems 17:878–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Günay T (2008) Erosion-forest, deforestation, soil. TEMA (Publication No:1), Istanbul

    Google Scholar 

  • IASS (2015) Soil atlas 2015. Heinrich Böll Foundation and the Institue for Advanced Sustainability Studies, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantarcı D (1993) Soil erosion: the most important environmental problem in Turkey (in Turkish). In: Proceedings of the 1st forestry congress, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschke L, Fuerst C, Frank S, Makeschin F (2012) A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol Ind 21:54–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levia DF, Hudson SA, Llorens P, Nanko K (2017) Throughfall drop size distributions: a review and prospectus for future research. WIRES-Water 4(4):e1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEF (2006) Turkey’s national action program on combating desertification (Publication No 250). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Forestry, Ankara, p 89. http://www.cem.gov.tr/erozyon/Files/moduller/collesme/belgeler/Turkey_s_National_Action_Program_on_Combating_Desertification.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2018

  • Morgan RPC (2005) Soil erosion & conservation, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Cornwall

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanko K, Hotta N, Suzuki M (2004) Assessing raindrop impact energy at the forest floor in a mature Japanese cypress plantation using continuous raindrop-sizing instruments. J For Res 9:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanko K, Onda Y, Ito A, Moriwaki H (2011) Spatial variability of throughfall under a single tree: Experimental study of rainfall amount, raindrops, and kinetic energy. Agric For Meteorol 151(9):1173–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamukcu P (2015) Integration of ecosystem services into landscape planning process (in Turkish). Dissertation, Istanbul University

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher BA (2002) Methods for the determination of total organic carbon in soils and sediments. Ecological Risk Assessment Support Center, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, NCEA-C-1282. http://bcodata.whoi.edu/LaurentianGreatLakes_Chemistry/bs116.pdf. Accessed 12 Jan 2019

  • TEMA (2015) Sustainable agriculture, healthy land for our future (in Turkish) [Press release]. The Turkish Foundation for Combating Soil Erosion for Reforestation and the Protection of Natural Habitats. http://tema.org.tr/web_14966-2_1/entitialfocus.aspx?primary_id=1463&target=categorial1&type=2&detail=single. Accessed 14 Jan 2019

  • Torri D, Poesen J, Borselli L (1997) Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset. CATENA 31(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torri D, Poesen J, Borselli L (2002) Corrigendum to “Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset” [CATENA 31: 1–22 (1997)]; and to “Erratum to Predictability and uncertainty of the soil erodibility factor using a global dataset” [CATENA 32:307–308 (1998)]. CATENA 46(4):309–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble SW, Mendel AC (1995) The cow as a geomorphic agent: a critical review. Geomorphology 13:233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSMS (2018) Şavşat weather station data. Turkish State Meteorological Service, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Tüfekçioğlu M, Yavuz M (2016) Estimating surface soil erosion losses and mapping erosion risk for Yusufeli micro-catchment (Artvin) (in Turkish). Artvin Coruh University. J For Fac 17(2):188–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Tüfekçioğlu M, Isenhart TM, Schultz RC, Bear DA, Kovar JL, Russell JR (2012) Stream bank erosion as a source of sediment and phosphorus in grazed pastures of the Rathbun Lake watershed in Southern Iowa, United States. J Soil Water Conser 67(6):545–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vatandaşlar C, Yavuz M (2017) Modeling cover management factor of RUSLE using very high-resolution satellite imagery in a semiarid watershed. Environ Earth Sci 76:65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6388-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vihervaara P, Mononen L, Santos F, Adamescu M, Cazacu C, Luque S, Geneletti D, Maes J (2017) Biophysical quantification. In: Burkhard B, Maes J (eds) Mapping ecosystem services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, pp 93–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz M, Vatandaşlar C (2017) Integrating soil erosion prevention activities into forest management plans: a review. In: Abstracts of the international symposium on new horizons in forestry, Süleyman Demirel University, Isparta, 18–20 October 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavuz M, Vatandaşlar C (2018) Monitoring temporal and ecological changes in protected areas with fragmentation analysis: a case study from Karagöl-Sahara National Park. Turk J For Res 5(1):82–96. https://doi.org/10.17568/ogmoad.403803

  • Yavuz M, Tufekcioglu M (2019) Estimating surface soil losses in the mountainous semi-arid watershed using RUSLE and geospatial technologies. Fresenius Environ Bull 28(4):2589–2598

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Can Vatandaşlar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vatandaşlar, C., Yavuz, M., Leuchner, M. (2020). Erosion Control Service of Forest Ecosystems: A Case Study from Northeastern Turkey. In: Nedkov, S., et al. Smart Geography. Key Challenges in Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28191-5_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics