Abstract
The context for health and hospital care will continue to change greatly. One area of change is ownership, between public, public-private partnership, private not-for-profit, and private for-profit. There are differences between formal and effective control, given that almost everywhere the state has a major role. Pseudo-markets can be created by a purchaser-provider split. Measurable performance differences between the various types is often ambiguous. Perhaps surprisingly, public hospitals are as efficient as private ones, but responsiveness is less. There should be different governance constraints to recognize the different types of provider. Guaranteeing universal access will require care in terms of contractability and accountability considerations, and bailout possibilities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
There are several other available typologies for PPP—see, for example, Barlow et al., Health Affairs, 2013. Some prominent PPP types such as a now almost famous Alzira model would not fit easily into the Montagu/Harding structure.
- 2.
According to Barlow et al. (2013) (footnote 1, above) these hospitals would be closer to a PPP than a ‘true’ private hospital: they are registered and committed to certain services in the state Krankenhausplan (hospital plan), contracted for the Krankenhausplan (sickness funds), and paid at the same DRG rate as public hospitals.
References
Augurzky, B., Engel, S., Krolop, C., Schmidt, M., & Terkatz, S. (2007). Hospital Rating Report 2006, Approaches to the Sustainable Financing of Patient Care and Treatment – Development of German Hospitals up to 2010. Essen: RWI-Heft 33.
Augurzky, B., Pilny, A., & Wübker, A. (2015). Krankenhäuser in privater Trägerschaft 2015. Essen: RWI Materialien 89.
Barlow, J. G., Roehrich, J. K., & Wright, S. (2013). Europe sees Mixed Results from Public-private Partnerships for Building and Managing Health Care Facilities and Services. Health Affairs, 32(1), 146–154.
Carter, R. B., Massa, I. J., & Power, M. L. (1997). An Examination of the Efficiency of Proprietary Hospital Ownership versus Non-Proprietary Hospital Ownership Structures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16, 63–87.
Comendeiro-Maaloe, M., Ridao-Lopez, M., Gorgemans, S., & Bernal-Delgado, E. (2018). A Comparative Performance Analysis of a Renowned Public Private Partnership for Health Care Provision in Spain Between 2003 and 2015. Health Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.11.009.
Eggleston, K., Shen, Y. C., Lau, J., Schmidt, C. H., & Chan, J. (2006). Hospital Ownership and Quality of Care: What Explains the Different Results? NBER Working Paper 12241.
Feldstein, P. J. (1979). Healthcare Economics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Hansmann, H. (1980). The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89, 835–890.
Hansmann, H., Kessler, D., & McClellan, M. (2002). Ownership Form and Trapped Capital in the Hospital Industry. NBER, Working Paper 8989.
Herr, A. (2008). Costs and Technical Efficiency of German Hospitals: Does Ownership Matter? Health Economics, 17, 1057–1071.
Higgins, J. (1988). The Business of Medicine: Private Healthcare in Britain. London: Macmillan.
Jeurissen, P. P. T. (2010). For-Profit Hospitals. A Comparative and Longitudinal Study of the For-Profit Hospital Sector in Four Western Countries. Rotterdam: Erasmus University. Dissertation.
Klijn, E. H., Edelenbos, J., & Hughes, M. (2007). Public-Private Partnership: A Two-Headed Reform. A Comparison of PPP in England and the Netherlands. In C. Pollitt, S. van Thiel, & V. Homburg (Eds.), New Public Management in Europe Adaption and Alternatives (pp. 71–89). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kruse, F. M., Stadhouders, N. W., Adang, E., Groenewoud, S., & Jeurissen, P. P. T. (2018). Do Private Hospitals Outperform Public Hospitals Regarding Efficiency, Accessibility, and Quality of Care in the European Union? A Literature Review. International Journal Health Planning and Management, 33(2), e434–e453.
Laing & Buisson. (2007). Laing’s Healthcare Market Review 2007–2008 (20th ed.). Bedfordshire: Newnorth Print Ltd.
Montagu, D., & Harding, A. (2012). A Zebra or a Painted Horse? Are Hospital PPPs Infrastructure Partnerships with Stripes or a Separate Species. World Hospitals and Health Services, 48(2), 15–20.
NAO – National Audit Office. (2018). PFI and PF2, Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, January 12, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/PFI-and-PF2.pdf.
Naylor, C., & Gregory, S. (2009, October). Briefing: Independent Sector Treatment Centres. London: Kings Fund.
OECD. (2018). OECD Stat. Retrieved April 1, 2019, from https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=HEALTH_REAC.
Pauly, M. V., & Redisch, M. (1973). The Non-Profit Hospital as a Physicians’ Cooperative. American Economic Review, 63, 87–99.
Schlesinger, M., & Gray, B. H. (2006). How Nonprofits Matter in American Medicine, and What to Do About It. Health Affairs, w287–w303.
Simon, M. (2000). Krankenhauspolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Historische Entwicklung und Probleme der Politisches Steuerung stationärer Krankenversorgung. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Toffolutti, V., Reeves, A., McKee, M., & Stuckler, D. (2017). Outsourcing Cleaning Services Increase MRSA Incidence: Evidence from 126 English Acute Trusts. Social Science and Medicine, 174, 64–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jeurissen, P., Maarse, H. (2020). Hospital Care: Private Assets for-a-Profit?. In: Durán, A., Wright, S. (eds) Understanding Hospitals in Changing Health Systems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28172-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28172-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28171-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28172-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)