Abstract
With limited resources, the delivery of affordable and reliable healthcare is increasingly becoming a difficult task for all nations across the globe. Decision makers in the healthcare domain in Canada are faced with the issue of seeking a balance between HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment spending. Therefore, we used Canadian case data in this study. Here, we present key limitations of this study, our major findings, implications of dynamic decision making research, and implications of improving practice in dynamic tasks in various domains including computer simulation-based education and training, aviation, healthcare, and policymaking. Based on the results reported in Chap. 4, here we will specifically discuss and argue why debriefing-based SDILE was effective in improving users’ decision making and learning in dynamic tasks and why it did not help users to become “efficient decision makers.” We will also talk about how the users perceived the utility of SIADH-ILE in improving their decision making and learning in the dynamic task.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdel-Hamid, T., Sengupta, K., & Swett, C. (1999). The impact of goals on software project management: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 1–19.
Alessi, A., & Kopainsky, B. (2015). System dynamics and simulation-gaming: Overview. Simulation and Gaming, 48(2–3), 223–229.
Ashton, R., & Kramer, S. (1980). Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: Some evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 15.
Beattie, J., & Looms, G. (1997). The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 155–168.
Bell, B. S., Kanar, A. M., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Current issues and future directions in simulation-based training in North America. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(8), 1416–1434.
Blazer, W. K., Doherty, M. E., & O'Connor, R. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 410–433.
Diehl, E., & Sterman, J. D. (1995). Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 198–215.
Größler, A., Rouwette, E., & Vennix, J. (2016). Non-conscious vs. deliberate dynamic decision-making—A pilot experiment. Systems, 4(13), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems4010013.
Krentza, H., & Gill, M. (2010). The five-year impact of an evolving global epidemic, changing migration patterns, and policy changes in a regional Canadian HIV population. Health Policy (Amsterdam), 90(2–3), 296–302.
Kriz, W. C. (2003). Creating effective learning environments and learning organizations through gaming simulation design. Simulation and Gaming, 34(4), 495–511.
Lakeh, B., & Ghaffarzadegan, N. (2015). Does analytical thinking improve understanding of accumulation? System Dynamics Review, 31(1–2), 46–65.
Locke, E. A. (1986). Generalizing from laboratory to field settings: Research findings from organizational behavior and human resource management. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington.
Montaner, J., Lima, V., Barrios, R., Yip, B., Wood, E., Kerr, T., & Kendall, P. (2010). Association of highly active antiretroviral therapy coverage, population viral load, and yearly new HIV diagnoses in British Columbia, Canada: A population-based study. www.thelancet.com, 376, 532–539.
Moxnes, E. (2004). Misperceptions of basic dynamics: The case of renewable resource management. System Dynamics Review, 20, 139–162.
NTSA. (2011). President’s notes. Training Industry News, 23(4), 2–2.
Paich, M., & Sterman, D. (1993). Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets. Management Science, 39(12), 1439–1458.
Payne, J. W., Johnson, E. J., Bettman, J. R., & Coupey, E. (1990). Understanding contingent choice: A computer simulation approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20, 296–309.
Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Plate, R. (2010). Assessing individuals’ understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 28(1), 19–33.
Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2007). Debriefing can reduce misperceptions of feedback hypothesis: An empirical study. Simulations and Gaming, 38(3), 382–397.
Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2010). Perceptions of the effectiveness of system dynamics-based interactive learning environments: An empirical study. Computers and Education, 55, 1277–1286.
Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2014). Yes we can: Improving performance in dynamic tasks. Decision Support Systems, 61, 23–33.
Qudrat-Ullah, H., Saleh, M. M., & Bahaa, E. A. (1997). Fish Bank ILE: An interactive learning laboratory to improve understanding of ‘The Tragedy of Commons’; a common behavior of complex dynamic systems. Proceedings of 15th International System Dynamics Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.
Schön, D. (1984). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Spector, J. M. (2000). System dynamics and interactive learning environments: Lessons learned and implications for the future. Simulation and Gaming, 31(4), 528–535.
Sterman, J. D. (1989). Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science, 35, 321–339.
Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and around complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 10, 291–323.
Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Expertise in complex problem solving: A comparison of alternative conceptions. In P. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Te’eni, D. (1991). Feedback in DSS as a source of control: Experiments with the timing of feedback. Decision Sciences, 22(3), 644–655.
Wright, W. F., & Abdul-Ezz, M. E. (1988). Effects of extrinsic incentives on the quality of frequency assessments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 143–152.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2020). Discussion and Conclusions. In: Improving Human Performance in Dynamic Tasks. SpringerBriefs in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28166-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28166-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28165-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28166-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)