Skip to main content

Discussion and Conclusions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Improving Human Performance in Dynamic Tasks

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Complexity ((BRIEFSCOMPLEXITY))

  • 426 Accesses

Abstract

With limited resources, the delivery of affordable and reliable healthcare is increasingly becoming a difficult task for all nations across the globe. Decision makers in the healthcare domain in Canada are faced with the issue of seeking a balance between HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment spending. Therefore, we used Canadian case data in this study. Here, we present key limitations of this study, our major findings, implications of dynamic decision making research, and implications of improving practice in dynamic tasks in various domains including computer simulation-based education and training, aviation, healthcare, and policymaking. Based on the results reported in Chap. 4, here we will specifically discuss and argue why debriefing-based SDILE was effective in improving users’ decision making and learning in dynamic tasks and why it did not help users to become “efficient decision makers.” We will also talk about how the users perceived the utility of SIADH-ILE in improving their decision making and learning in the dynamic task.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdel-Hamid, T., Sengupta, K., & Swett, C. (1999). The impact of goals on software project management: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 23(4), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alessi, A., & Kopainsky, B. (2015). System dynamics and simulation-gaming: Overview. Simulation and Gaming, 48(2–3), 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton, R., & Kramer, S. (1980). Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: Some evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 18(1), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, J., & Looms, G. (1997). The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 155–168.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. S., Kanar, A. M., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Current issues and future directions in simulation-based training in North America. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(8), 1416–1434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blazer, W. K., Doherty, M. E., & O'Connor, R. (1989). Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 410–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, E., & Sterman, J. D. (1995). Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 198–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Größler, A., Rouwette, E., & Vennix, J. (2016). Non-conscious vs. deliberate dynamic decision-making—A pilot experiment. Systems, 4(13), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems4010013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krentza, H., & Gill, M. (2010). The five-year impact of an evolving global epidemic, changing migration patterns, and policy changes in a regional Canadian HIV population. Health Policy (Amsterdam), 90(2–3), 296–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriz, W. C. (2003). Creating effective learning environments and learning organizations through gaming simulation design. Simulation and Gaming, 34(4), 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakeh, B., & Ghaffarzadegan, N. (2015). Does analytical thinking improve understanding of accumulation? System Dynamics Review, 31(1–2), 46–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A. (1986). Generalizing from laboratory to field settings: Research findings from organizational behavior and human resource management. Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montaner, J., Lima, V., Barrios, R., Yip, B., Wood, E., Kerr, T., & Kendall, P. (2010). Association of highly active antiretroviral therapy coverage, population viral load, and yearly new HIV diagnoses in British Columbia, Canada: A population-based study. www.thelancet.com, 376, 532–539.

  • Moxnes, E. (2004). Misperceptions of basic dynamics: The case of renewable resource management. System Dynamics Review, 20, 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NTSA. (2011). President’s notes. Training Industry News, 23(4), 2–2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paich, M., & Sterman, D. (1993). Boom, bust, and failures to learn in experimental markets. Management Science, 39(12), 1439–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W., Johnson, E. J., Bettman, J. R., & Coupey, E. (1990). Understanding contingent choice: A computer simulation approach. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20, 296–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plate, R. (2010). Assessing individuals’ understanding of nonlinear causal structures in complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 28(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2007). Debriefing can reduce misperceptions of feedback hypothesis: An empirical study. Simulations and Gaming, 38(3), 382–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2010). Perceptions of the effectiveness of system dynamics-based interactive learning environments: An empirical study. Computers and Education, 55, 1277–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2014). Yes we can: Improving performance in dynamic tasks. Decision Support Systems, 61, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qudrat-Ullah, H., Saleh, M. M., & Bahaa, E. A. (1997). Fish Bank ILE: An interactive learning laboratory to improve understanding of ‘The Tragedy of Commons’; a common behavior of complex dynamic systems. Proceedings of 15th International System Dynamics Conference, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1984). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M. (2000). System dynamics and interactive learning environments: Lessons learned and implications for the future. Simulation and Gaming, 31(4), 528–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (1989). Modeling managerial behavior: Misperceptions of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Management Science, 35, 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (1994). Learning in and around complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 10, 291–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Expertise in complex problem solving: A comparison of alternative conceptions. In P. Frensch & J. Funke (Eds.), Complex problem solving: The European perspective (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Te’eni, D. (1991). Feedback in DSS as a source of control: Experiments with the timing of feedback. Decision Sciences, 22(3), 644–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W. F., & Abdul-Ezz, M. E. (1988). Effects of extrinsic incentives on the quality of frequency assessments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 143–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Qudrat-Ullah, H. (2020). Discussion and Conclusions. In: Improving Human Performance in Dynamic Tasks. SpringerBriefs in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28166-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics