Hybrid Meetings in the Modern Workplace: Stories of Success and Failure

  • Banu SaatçiEmail author
  • Roman Rädle
  • Sean Rintel
  • Kenton O’Hara
  • Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11677)


Hybrid meetings, in which co-located and remote participants connect via video or/audio, have become ubiquitous in the globalized modern workplace. Despite, or perhaps because of this ubiquity, conducting hybrid meetings is not straightforward. In this paper, we investigate the opportunities and challenges of hybrid meetings. We conducted a multi-site study of hybrid meetings in two global software companies in Europe, using participant observation, semi-structured interviews and video-analysis. Our findings show that there is a significant diversity in formats and requirements for hybrid meetings in different working environments. Further, hybrid meeting participants perceive and handle a range of both expected and emergent problems. While some problems can be attributed to difficulties or failures of technical infrastructure, others arise out of asymmetries of interaction and social and cultural context across the co-located and remote settings. We argue that managing these asymmetries is key to a successful hybrid meeting.


Hybrid meetings Video conferencing Remote collaboration 



Banu Saatçi’s work has been supported by Microsoft Research through its PhD Scholarship Programme in EMEA. We thank both companies and their employees for taking part in our research and anonymous reviewers for their valuable feedback along with Christian Remy, Gökçe Elif Baykal, Midas Nouwens, Bjarke Vognstrup Fog, Cristian Roner and Kaya Akyüz for their comments and suggestions on earlier drafts.


  1. 1.
    Bekkering, E., Shim, J.P.: Trust in videoconferencing. Commun. ACM 49(7), 103–107 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bell, G., Dourish, P.: Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 11(2), 133–143 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradner, E., Mark, G.: Social presence with video and application sharing. In: Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 154–161. ACM (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charmaz, K.: Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage, London (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diamant, E.I., Fussell, S.R., Lo, F.l.: Where did we turn wrong?: unpacking the effect of culture and technology on attributions of team performance. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 383–392. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diamant, E.I., Fussell, S.R., Lo, F.L.: Collaborating across cultural and technological boundaries: team culture and information use in a map navigation task. In: Proceedings of the 2009 International Workshop on Intercultural Collaboration, pp. 175–184. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dourish, P., Adler, A., Bellotti, V., Henderson, A.: Your place or mine? Learning from long-term use of audio-video communication. Comput. Support. Coop. Work (CSCW) 5(1), 33–62 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fussell, S.R., Setlock, L.D., Yang, J., Ou, J., Mauer, E., Kramer, A.D.: Gestures over video streams to support remote collaboration on physical tasks. Hum. Comput. Interact. 19(3), 273–309 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heath, C., Luff, P.: Disembodied conduct: communication through video in a multi-media office environment. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 99–103. ACM (1991)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heath, C., Luff, P.: Media space and communicative asymmetries: preliminary observations of video-mediated interaction. Hum. Comput. Interact. 7(3), 315–346 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hossain, E., Babar, M.A., Paik, H.: Using scrum in global software development: a systematic literature review. In: 2009 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Global Software Engineering, pp. 175–184, July 2009.
  12. 12.
    Huang, W., Olson, J.S., Olson, G.M.: Camera angle affects dominance in video-mediated communication. In: CHI 2002 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 716–717. ACM (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isaacs, E.A., Tang, J.C.: What video can and cannot do for collaboration: a case study. Multimedia Syst. 2(2), 63–73 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kristoffersson, A., Coradeschi, S., Loutfi, A.: A review of mobile robotic telepresence. Adv. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2013, 3 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mukawa, N., Oka, T., Arai, K., Yuasa, M.: What is connected by mutual gaze?: user’s behavior in video-mediated communication. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1677–1680. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nakanishi, H., Tanaka, K., Wada, Y.: Remote handshaking: touch enhances video-mediated social telepresence. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2143–2152. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neustaedter, C., Venolia, G., Procyk, J., Hawkins, D.: To beam or not to beam: a study of remote telepresence attendance at an academic conference. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, pp. 418–431. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ou, J., Fussell, S.R., Chen, X., Setlock, L.D., Yang, J.: Gestural communication over video stream: supporting multimodal interaction for remote collaborative physical tasks. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pp. 242–249. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oulasvirta, A.: FEATURE: when users do the Ubicomp. Interactions 15(2), 6–9 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oulasvirta, A., Sumari, L.: Mobile kits and laptop trays: managing multiple devices in mobile information work. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1127–1136. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Setlock, L.D., Fussell, S.R., Neuwirth, C.: Taking it out of context: collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 604–613. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith, D., et al.: Overhear: augmenting attention in remote social gatherings through computer-mediated hearing. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1801–1804. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tan, A., Kondoz, A.M.: Barriers to virtual collaboration. In: CHI 2008 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2045–2052. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Teoh, C., Regenbrecht, H., O’Hare, D.: Investigating factors influencing trust in video-mediated communication. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 312–319. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Weiser, M.: The computer for the 21st century. Sci. Am. 265(3), 94–105 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xu, B., Ellis, J., Erickson, T.: Attention from afar: simulating the gazes of remote participants in hybrid meetings. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 101–113. ACM (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yamashita, N., Hirata, K., Aoyagi, S., Kuzuoka, H., Harada, Y.: Impact of seating positions on group video communication. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 177–186. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yankelovich, N., Kaplan, J., Provino, J., Wessler, M., DiMicco, J.M.: Improving audio conferencing: are two ears better than one? In: Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 333–342. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yankelovich, N., Simpson, N., Kaplan, J., Provino, J.: Porta-person: telepresence for the connected conference room. In: CHI 2007 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2789–2794. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yankelovich, N., Walker, W., Roberts, P., Wessler, M., Kaplan, J., Provino, J.: Meeting central: making distributed meetings more effective. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 419–428. ACM (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Digital Design and Information StudiesAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  2. 2.Computer ScienceAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  3. 3.Microsoft ResearchCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations