Abstract
A mixed methodology study measuring the usage rates of Augmented Reality (AR) information overlay mapping time-on-task in informal learning environments at a local art museum. This study investigates whether AR systems provide a uniquely beneficial learning context due to AR’s native function to overlay information onto physical spaces at an art museum and the impact on participant perceived self-efficacy and overall engagement within the AR-enhanced environment. Participants also took part in an open-ended survey within the application. The quantitative data collected suggest that participants were highly engaged and utilized the application at the art museum extensively (N = 143); the qualitative results indicated that AR participants were exceedingly motivated and perceived an enhanced sense of engagement with the exhibit sites.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Azuma, R. (2004). Overview of augmented reality. Proceedings of the conference on SIGGRAPH 2004 course notes – GRAPH ‘04.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
Bressler, D., & Bodzin, A. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students’ flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505–517.
Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 536–544.
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research + the mixed methods reader (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
Google.com. (2018). Features – Google analytics. [online] Available at: http://www.google.com/analytics/features/. Accessed 1 May 2018.
Johnson, L., Haywood, K., Levine, A., Willis, H., & Smith, R. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: New Media Consortium, & Educause.
Juan, M., Mendez-Lopez, M., Perez-Hernandez, E., & Albiol-Perez, S. (2014). Augmented reality for the assessment of children’s spatial memory in real settings. PLoS One, 9(12), e113751.
Kesim, M., & Ozarslan, Y. (2012). Augmented reality in education: Current technologies and the potential for education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 297–302.
Lin, T., Duh, H. B., Li, N., Wang, H., & Tsai, C. (2013). An investigation of learners’ collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314–321.
Squires, D. (2018). Bridging the learning gap augmented reality’s impact on associative information processing, cognitive load, and working memory: A mixed-methods research study. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 17.
Tang, A., Owen, C., Biocca, F., & Mou, W. (2003). Performance evaluation of augmented reality for directed assembly. Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing, 311–331.
Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570–585.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Joseph Schenk, Director of the Art Museum of South Texas; Deborah Fullerton, Curator of Exhibitions; Karol Stewart, Coordinator of Community Services; Sara Morgan, Assistant Director; Sheri Emerick, Development Officer; Linda Rodriguez, Curator of Education; and Angela Resendez.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Squires, D.R. (2019). Instructional Designs and Educational Technologies Within Augmented Reality Transmedia Storytelling: IDET ARTS. In: Branch, R., Lee, H., Tseng, S. (eds) Educational Media and Technology Yearbook. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27986-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27986-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27985-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27986-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)