Skip to main content

Instructional Designs and Educational Technologies Within Augmented Reality Transmedia Storytelling: IDET ARTS

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educational Media and Technology Yearbook

Part of the book series: Educational Media and Technology Yearbook ((EMTY,volume 42))

Abstract

A mixed methodology study measuring the usage rates of Augmented Reality (AR) information overlay mapping time-on-task in informal learning environments at a local art museum. This study investigates whether AR systems provide a uniquely beneficial learning context due to AR’s native function to overlay information onto physical spaces at an art museum and the impact on participant perceived self-efficacy and overall engagement within the AR-enhanced environment. Participants also took part in an open-ended survey within the application. The quantitative data collected suggest that participants were highly engaged and utilized the application at the art museum extensively (N = 143); the qualitative results indicated that AR participants were exceedingly motivated and perceived an enhanced sense of engagement with the exhibit sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Azuma, R. (2004). Overview of augmented reality. Proceedings of the conference on SIGGRAPH 2004 course notes – GRAPH ‘04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bressler, D., & Bodzin, A. (2013). A mixed methods assessment of students’ flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(6), 505–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 536–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research + the mixed methods reader (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Google.com. (2018). Features – Google analytics. [online] Available at: http://www.google.com/analytics/features/. Accessed 1 May 2018.

  • Johnson, L., Haywood, K., Levine, A., Willis, H., & Smith, R. (2011). The 2011 Horizon Report. Austin, Texas: New Media Consortium, & Educause. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Juan, M., Mendez-Lopez, M., Perez-Hernandez, E., & Albiol-Perez, S. (2014). Augmented reality for the assessment of children’s spatial memory in real settings. PLoS One, 9(12), e113751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kesim, M., & Ozarslan, Y. (2012). Augmented reality in education: Current technologies and the potential for education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T., Duh, H. B., Li, N., Wang, H., & Tsai, C. (2013). An investigation of learners’ collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, D. (2018). Bridging the learning gap augmented reality’s impact on associative information processing, cognitive load, and working memory: A mixed-methods research study. Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, A., Owen, C., Biocca, F., & Mou, W. (2003). Performance evaluation of augmented reality for directed assembly. Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications in Manufacturing, 311–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Joseph Schenk, Director of the Art Museum of South Texas; Deborah Fullerton, Curator of Exhibitions; Karol Stewart, Coordinator of Community Services; Sara Morgan, Assistant Director; Sheri Emerick, Development Officer; Linda Rodriguez, Curator of Education; and Angela Resendez.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David R. Squires .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Squires, D.R. (2019). Instructional Designs and Educational Technologies Within Augmented Reality Transmedia Storytelling: IDET ARTS. In: Branch, R., Lee, H., Tseng, S. (eds) Educational Media and Technology Yearbook. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, vol 42. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27986-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27986-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27985-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27986-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics