Skip to main content

The Suffering Avatar: Vicarity and Resistance in Body-Tracked Multiplayer Gaming

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Immersive Embodiment

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Performance and Technology ((PSPT))

  • 556 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines acts of co-immersion in a multiplayer full body-tracked video game, focusing on what I term as ‘hyper-intercorporeal’ encounters between two or more avatar-players in real-world and computer-generated spaces. Drawing on an incident of accidental avatar disfigurement that occurred inside a location-based VR zombie shooter game called City Z (2017–), I will scrutinize the wider ethical complexities of vicarious suffering in gaming contexts. Revisiting the ‘psychotechnic checa’ (torture cell) as a cautionary historical example of the potential to weaponize enveloping aesthetics, I will progress to consider whether the postdigital enmeshment of real and simulated bodies in virtual gaming environments requires a revision of notions of avatars as delegated forms of consumption or ‘interpassive objects’ (Pfaller, Robert. 1996. Um die Ecke Gelacht. Kuratoren Nehmen uns die Kunstbetrachtung ab, Videorecorder Schauen sich unsere Lieblingsfilme an: Anmerkungen zum Paradoxon der Interpassivität. In Falter 41/96.71) that feel on a player’s behalf. An avatar-self in gaming shifts the focus of body-ownership over a virtual proxy from a desire ‘know’ an other’s bodied experiences, to a vehicle for strategic gameplay and to heighten affective responses in situations where our avatar is subjected to ‘physical’ threat. I argue that perceptually embodied avatars challenge the idea that the simulacrum of an avatar’s suffering is at a safe remove from the player, examining the reactions of player-avatars immersed in survival horror games. I will consider how unintended glitches and moments of system failure might provide a critical space to interrogate illusions that elicit our bodies’ acquiescence to unconsciously receive virtual scenarios in the order of the hyperreal. I further contend that jarring glitches provide opportunities to salvage unintended and increasingly vital spaces of recuperation from the psychological exhaustion, vicarious suffering or compassion fatigue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aarseth, Espen. 2007. I Fought the Law: Transgressive Play and The Implied Player. In DiGRA ’07—Proceedings of the 2007 DiGRA International Conference: Situated Play, 130–133. The University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, Ernest. 2004. The Designer’s Notebook: Postmodernism and the 3 Types of Immersion. Gamasutra. Uploaded 9 July 2004. https://www.gamasutra.com/view/feature/130531/the_designers_notebook_.php. Accessed 19 Aug 2018.

  • Apperley, Thomas. 2010. Gaming Rhythms: Play and Counterplay from the Situated to the Global. Theory on Demand Series. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailes, Sara Jane. 2011. Performance Theatre and the Poetics of Failure. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ball III, James R. 2016. Proximity to Violence: War, Games, Glitch. In Reframing Immersive Theatre, ed. James Frieze, 229–242. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bartle, Richard A. 2003. Designing Virtual Worlds. Indianapolis, IN: New Riders Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, Jean. 1993 [1976]. Symbolic Exchange and Death, trans. Iain Hamilton Grant. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994 [1981]. Simulacra and Simulations, trans. Sheila Faria Glaser. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierend, Doug. 2016. The Dark Age of Virtual Reality-Based Torture Is Approaching Fast. Vice. Uploaded 31 January 2015. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/vvbxmm/how-virtual-reality-could-be-used-for-torture. Accessed 27 Sep 2019.

  • Bogost, Ian. 2011. Empathy. In How to Do Things With Videogames, vol. 38. NED—New edition ed., 18–23. University of Minnesota Press. JSTOR. www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttttmwd.5.

  • Botella, Cristina, Berenice Serrano, Rosa M. Baños, and Azucena Garcia-Palacios. 2015. Virtual Reality Exposure-Based Therapy for the Treatment of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: A Review of Its Efficacy, the Adequacy of the Treatment Protocol, and Its Acceptability. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 11: 2533–2545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calleja, Gordon. 2011. In-Game: From Immersion to Incorporation. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Erasing the Magic Circle. In The Philosophy of Computer Games, ed. J.R. Sageng, T.M. Larsen, and H. Fossheim. London, UK: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Causey, Matthew. 2016. Postdigital Performance. Theatre Journal 68 (3): 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creative Health: The Arts for Health and Wellbeing—The Short Report. 2017. All-Party Parliamentary Group on Arts, Health and Wellbeing Inquiry Report. July 2017. http://www.artshealthandwellbeing.org.uk/appg-inquiry/Publications/Creative_Health_The_Short_Report.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2018.

  • de Vignemont, Frédérique. 2018. Mind the Body: An Exploration of Bodily Self-Awareness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolphjin, Rick, and Iris van der Tuin. 2012. New Materialism: Interviews & Cartographies. Ann Arbor: MPublishing, University of Michigan Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer-Witheford, Nick, and Greig de Peuter. 2009. Games of Empire: Global Capitalism and Video Games. Minneapolis and London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eco, Umberto. 1986. Travels in Hyperreality, trans. William Weaver. London: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Lada Čale. 2010. Intro 1: PSi Mis-Performing Papers. Performance Research 15 (2): 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusaro, Martina, Gaetano Tieri, and Salvatore Maria Aglioti. 2016. Seeing Pain and Pleasure on Self and Others: Behavioral and Psychophysiological Reactivity in Immersive Virtual Reality. Journal of Neurophysiology 116 (6): 2656–2662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1989 [1960]. Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grindon, Gavin. 2015. The Museum of Cruel Designs. Dismaland Catalogue, ed. Banksy, Dismaland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, Johan. 1955 [1938]. Homo ludens: Proeve ener bepaling van het spelelement der cultuur. Referred from English translation Homo Ludens: A Study of Play Element in Culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huuhka, Marleena. 2018. Into the Void—Examination on Non-Human Performativity, Errors and Immersion. IFTR Conference 2018, Belgrade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikegami, Eiko. 2016. Visualizing the Networked Self: Agency, Reflexivity, and the Social Life of Avatars. Social Research 78 (4): 1155–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Jason. 2016. We Should Be Talking About Torture in VR. Versions. Uploaded 28 March 2016. https://killscreen.com/versions/we-should-be-talking-about-torture-in-vr/. Accessed 29 July 2018.

  • Kerr, John H., and Michael J. Apter (eds.). 1991. Adult Play: A Reversal Theory Approach. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilteni, Konstantina, Raphaela Groten, and Mel Slater. 2012. The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Presence Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 21 (4): 373–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, Jacques. 1992 [1986]. The Ethics of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landsberg, Alison. 2004. Prosthetic Memory: The Transformation of American Remembrance in the Age of Mass Culture. New York and Chichester: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leménager, Tagrid, Julia Dieter, Holger Hill, Anne Koopmann, Iris Reinhard, Madlen Sell, Falk Kiefer, Sabine Vollstädt-Klein, and Karl Mann. 2014. Neurobiological Correlates of Physical Self-Concept and Self-Identification with Avatars in Addicted Players of Massively Multiplayer Online Role-Playing Games (MMORPGs). Addictive Behaviors 39 (12): 1789–1797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, William W. 2018. Between Potentiality and Actuality in Corporatized Theatres of Virtual Reality. International Federation for Theatre Research (IFTR) Conference. 12 July 2018, Belgrade, Serbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebe, Michael. 2008. There Is No Magic Circle: On the Difference Between Computer Games and Traditional Games. In Conference Proceedings of the Philosophy of Computer Games 2008, ed. S. Günzel, M. Liebe, and D. Mersch, 324–341. Potsdam, Germany: Potsdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madary, Michael, and Thomas K. Metzinger. 2016. Real Virtuality: A Code of Ethical Conduct Recommendations for Good Scientific Practice and the Consumers of VR-Technology. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, vol. 3, February 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meades, Alan F. 2015. Understanding Counterplay in Video Games. New York and Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, Michael, Brent Insko, Mary Whitton, and Frederick P. Brooks. 2002. Physiological Measures of Presence in Stressful Virtual Environments. ACM Transactions on Graphics 21: 645–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1964 [1951]. The Child’s Relations with Others. In The Primacy of Perception, trans. W. Cobb, 96–155. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1964 [1960]. The Philosopher and His Shadow. In Signs, trans. R.C. McLeary, 159–181. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger, Thomas. 2013a. The Myth of Cognitive Agency: Subpersonal Thinking as a Cyclically Recurring Loss of Mental Autonomy. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 931.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013b. Why Are Dreams Interesting for Philosophers? The Example of Minimal Phenomenal Selfhood, Plus an Agenda for Future Research. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger, Thomas K. 2018. Why Is Virtual Reality Interesting for Philosophers? Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novacic, Ines. 2015. How Might Virtual Reality Change the World? Stanford Lab Peers into Future. CBS News. Uploaded 18 June 2015. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/how-might-virtual-reality-change-the-world-stanford-lab-peers-into-future/. Accessed 30 July 2018.

  • Pargman, Daniel, and Peter Jakobsson. 2008. Do You Believe in Magic? Computer Games in Everyday Life. European Journal of Cultural Studies 11 (2): 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaller, Robert. 1996. Um die Ecke Gelacht. Kuratoren Nehmen uns die Kunstbetrachtung ab, Videorecorder Schauen sich unsere Lieblingsfilme an: Anmerkungen zum Paradoxon der Interpassivität. In Falter 41/96.71.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014 [2002]. On the Pleasure Principle in Culture: Illusions Without Owners. London and New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Interpassivity: The Aesthetics of Delegated Enjoyment. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, Jacques. 2009. The Emancipated Spectator. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridout, Nicholas. 2006. Stage Fright, Animals and Other Theatrical Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Theatre & Ethics. Basingstoke and New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riener, Robert, and Matthias Harders. 2012. Virtual Reality in Medicine. London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, Albert, Maria T. Schultheis, and Barbara O. Rothbaum. 2002. Ethical Issues for the Use of Virtual Reality in the Psychological Sciences. In Ethical Issues in Clinical Neuropsychology, ed. S. Bush and M. Drexler, 243–280. Lisse, NL: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothbaum, B.O. (ed.). 2006. Pathological Anxiety: Emotional Processing in Etiology and Treatment. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, Joshua. 2018. Are We Already Living in Virtual Reality? The New Yorker. Uploaded 2 April 2018. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/04/02/are-we-already-living-in-virtual-reality. Accessed 30 Sept 2018.

  • Rubin, Peter. 2018. Future Presence: How Virtual Reality Is Changing Human Connection, Intimacy, and the Limits of Ordinary Life. New York, USA: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, Rebecca, and Laurence Kirmayer. 2008. Dissociative Experience and Cultural Neuroscience: Narrative, Metaphor and Mechanism. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 32 (1): 31–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, Mel. 2009. Place Illusion and Plausibility Can Lead to Realistic Behaviour in Immersive Virtual Environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 364 (1535): 3549–3557. December 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somnai. 2018. Somnai website. https://www.dotdot.london. Accessed 20 Aug 2018.

  • Star Wars: Secrets of the Empire. The Void. https://www.thevoid.com. Accessed 4 Aug 2018.

  • Suits, Bernard. 2005 [1978]. The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremlett, Giles. 2003. Anarchists and the Fine Art of Torture. Guardian: World News. Uploaded on 27 January 2003. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2003/jan/27/spain.arts. Accessed 29 July 2018.

  • Weber, Rachel. 2016. “Black Mirror”: “Playtest” Episode Is Horrific Take on HoloLens, Gaming. Rolling Stone. Uploaded 21 October 2018. 20 August 2018. https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/black-mirror-playtest-episode-is-horrific-take-on-hololens-gaming-103640/.

  • Welcome to Hyper-Reality by THE VOID. 2016. The Void: #Blog. Uploaded 27 September 2016. https://blog.thevoid.com/welcome-hyper-reality-void/?_ga=2.9009969.587383149.1532515757-1311182332.1532515757. Accessed 2 Aug 2018.

  • Wilson, Laetitia. 2003. Interactivity or Interpassivity: A Question of Agency in Digital Play. In DAC 2003 Proceedings. Available online at http://www.academia.edu/1367070/Interactivity_or_interpassivity_A_question_of_agency_in_digital_play.

  • Wolfendale, Jessica. 2007. My Avatar, My Self: Virtual Harm and Attachment. Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2): 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, Zhi-Jin, and Mike Zhengyu Yao. 2013. Gaming Motivations, Avatar-Self Identification and Symptoms of Online Game Addiction. Asian Journal of Communication 23 (5): 555–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 1997. The Plague of Fantasies. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. The Interpassive Subject. Slavoj Žižek. Centre Georges Pompidou, Paris, Traverses.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. How to Read Lacan. London: Granta.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liam Jarvis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jarvis, L. (2019). The Suffering Avatar: Vicarity and Resistance in Body-Tracked Multiplayer Gaming. In: Immersive Embodiment. Palgrave Studies in Performance and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27971-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics