Abstract
Claims by and about professions are challenged by a simple chunking method. This obliges conventional professionalisation histories to incorporate alternative evidence. Western modern professions have been around for 200 years and are viewed by many as obvious parts of society. Modern professions are quite new and have spent a lot of time and energy contesting occupational territory in labour markets; they are not simply about knowledge, progress and care in modern society. Contemplating four artificial fifty-year blocks to recount changes and developments to professions usefully disrupts naturalised histories. Earlier professions changed under socioeconomic pressures, and this continues today. Better explanations of how professions developed to the present are necessary preparation for big changes coming with the rebalancing of geopolitical power and the oncoming digital era.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott, A. D. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Baldwin, R. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Barnard, A. (2004). History and theory in anthropology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Barton, R. (2003). ‘Men of science’: Language, identity and professionalization in the mid-Victorian scientific community. History of Science, 41(1), 73–119.
Becker, H. S., Greer, B., Hughes, E., & Strauss, A. (1961). Boys in white: Student culture in medical school (3rd print, 1984 ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
Berlant, J. L. (1975). Profession and monopoly: A study of medicine in the United States and Great Britain. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood. https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/bourdieu-forms-capital.htm.
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14–25.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Brock, D. M., Leblebici, H., & Muzio, D. (2014). Understanding professionals and their workplaces: The mission of the Journal of Professions and Organization. Journal of Professions & Organization, 1(1), 1–15.
Brown, K., & Gilfoyle, D. (Eds.). (2010). Healing the herds: Disease, livestock economies, and the globalization of veterinary medicine. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.
Bud, R. (2007). Penicillin: Triumph and tragedy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Burns, E. A. (2007). Positioning a post-professional approach to studying professions. New Zealand Sociology, 22(1), 69–98.
Burns, E. A. (2009). ‘Urged for more than fifty years’: Veterinary education in New Zealand, c1900–1964. History of Education Review, 38(1), 63–77.
Burns, E. A. (2015). Reading theory or reading historical evidence: The case of Anglo-settler veterinary professionalization. InterDisciplines: Journal of History & Sociology, 6(1), 121–149.
Burrage, M. C., & Torstendahl, R. (Eds.). (1990). Professions in theory and history. London: Sage.
Carr-Saunders, A. M., & Wilson, P. A. (1964 [1933]). The professions. London: Frank Cass.
Corfield, P. J. (1995). Power and the professions in early industrial Britain. London: Routledge.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavior Brain Science, 24(1), 87–114.
Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57.
Davies, C. (1980). Rewriting nursing history. London: Croom Helm.
Davies, C. (2007). Rewriting nursing history—Again? Nursing History Review, 15, 11–28.
Dent, M. (1993). Professionalism, educated labour and the state: Hospital medicine and the new managerialism. Sociological Review, 41(2), 244–273.
Derber, C., Schwartz, W. A., & Magrass, Y. R. (1990). Power in the highest degree: Professionals and the rise of a new mandarin order. New York: Oxford University Press.
de Tocqueville, A. (2017 [1835]). Democracy in America. London: Forgotten Books.
Dingwall, R. W. J., & Fenn, P. (1987). ‘A respectable profession?’ Sociological and economic perspectives on the regulation of professional services. International Journal of Law & Economics, 7(1), 51–64.
Eggar, V. (1986). Fabian in Egypt: Salamah Musa and the rise of the professional classes, 1909–1939. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Flexner, A. (1910). The Flexner report: Medical education in the United States and Canada (Bulletin No. 4). New York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. http://archive.carnegiefoundation.org/pdfs/elibrary/Carnegie_Flexner_Report.pdf.
Flexner, A. (1915). Is social work a profession? School & Society, 1(26), 90–111.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1973). Birth of the clinic. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (2000 [1994]). For an ethic of discomfort. In J. D. Fabion (Ed.), Essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (pp. 443–448). New York: Free Press.
Fournier, V. (1999). The appeal to ‘professionalism’ as a disciplinary mechanism. The Sociological Review, 47(2), 280–307.
Fournier, V. (2000). Boundary work and the (un)making of the professions. In N. Malin (Ed.), Professionalism, boundaries and the workplace (pp. 67–86). London: Routledge.
Freidson, E. (1970a). Professional dominance. New York: Atherton.
Freidson, E. (1970b). Profession of medicine. New York: Dodd, Mead.
Friedman, S. (2015). The limits of capital gains: Using Bourdieu to understand social mobility into elite occupations. In J. Thatcher, N. Ingram, C. Burke, & J. Abrahams (Eds.), Bourdieu: The next generation (pp. 107–123). London: Routledge.
Go, J. (2003). Waves of American empire, 1787–2003: US empire and imperialistic activity from the shores of Tripoli to Iraq. International Sociology, 22(1), 5–40.
Go, J. (2009). The ‘new’ sociology of empire and colonialism. Sociology Compass, 3(5), 775–788.
Go, J. (2013a). For a postcolonial sociology. Theory & Society, 42(1), 25–55.
Go, J. (2013b). Sociology’s imperial unconscious: The emergence of American sociology in the context of empire. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), Sociology and empire (pp. 82–105). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Goode, W. J. (1957). Community within a community: The professions. American Sociological Review, 22(2), 194–200.
Goode, W. J. (1969). The theoretical limits of professionalization. In A. Etzioni (Ed.), The semi professions and their organization: Teachers, nurses, and social workers (pp. 266–313). New York: Free Press.
Green, J. (2005). Professions and community. New Zealand Sociology, 20, 122–141.
Green, W. A. (1995). Periodizing world history. History & Theory, 34(2), 99–111.
Grey, C. (1994). Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline. Sociology, 28(2), 479–497.
Harford, T. (2007). The undercover economist. New York: Random.
Harrington, B. (2015). Going global: Professionals and the micro-foundations of institutional change. Journal of Professions & Organization, 2(2), 103–121.
Haug, M. R. (1975). The deprofessionalization of everyone? Sociological Forces, 8(3), 197–213.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2006). Understanding the historical turn in the policy sciences: A critique of stochastic, narrative, path dependency and process-sequencing models of policy-making over time. Policy Sciences, 39(1), 1–18.
Illich, I. (1975). Medical nemesis. London: Marion Boyars.
Illich, I. (1977). Disabling professions. In I. Illich, et al. (Eds.), Disabling professions (pp. 11–40). New York: Marion Boyars.
James, D. (2015). How Bourdieu bites back: Recognising misrecognition in education and educational research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(1), 97–112.
Jenkins, L. A. (2016). ‘For love or for money’: A history of amateurism in the Olympic Games. Fightland Blog. http://fightland.vice.com/blog/for–love–or–for–money–a–history–of–amateurism–in–the–olympic–games.
Johnson, T. J. (1972). Professions and power. London: Macmillan. Republished Routledge, 2016.
Johnson, T. J. (1973). Imperialism and the professions: Notes on the development of professional occupations in Britain’s colonies and the new states. In P. Halmos (Ed.), Professionalisation and social change (pp. 281–309). Keele, UK: Keele University Press.
Johnson, T. J. (1995). Governmentality and the institutionalization of expertise. In T. J. Johnson, G. Larkin, & M. Saks (Eds.), Health professions and the state in Europe (pp. 7–24). London: Routledge.
Jones, S. D. (2003). Valuing animals. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Kimball, B. A. (1995). The ‘true professional ideal’ in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Krause, E. A. (1996). Death of the guilds: Professions, states, and the advancement of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Langerock, H. (1915). Professionalism: A study in professional deformation. American Journal of Sociology, 21(1), 30–44.
Larson, M. S. (1977). The rise of professionalism: A sociological analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Larson, M. S. (1990). On the matter of experts and professionals, or how impossible is it to leave nothing unsaid. In R. Torstendahl & M. C. Burrage (Eds.), The formation of professions (pp. 11–23). London: Sage.
Linklater, A. (2002). Measuring America. London: HarperCollins.
Lorey, D. E. (1992). The rise of the professions in twentieth-century Mexico: university graduates and occupational changes since 1929. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Latin American Publications Center.
Macdonald, K. M. (1995). The sociology of the professions. London: Sage.
Malatesta, M. (Ed.). (2002). Society and the professions in Italy, 1860–1914. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Marshall, T. (1939). The recent history of professionalisation in relation to social structure and social policy. Canadian Journal of Economics & Political Sciences, 5, 325–340.
Martineau, H. (2016 [1837]). Society in America (Vol. 1). London: Forgotten Books.
May, C. (2007). The clinical encounter and the problem of context. Sociology, 41(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072282.
Mcdonald, T. J. (Ed.). (1996). The historic turn in the human sciences. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
McDonald, L. (2001). Florence Nightingale and the early origins of evidence-based nursing. Evidence Based Nursing, 4(3), 68–69.
Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97.
Millerson, G. (1964a). Dilemmas of professionalism. New Society, 4, 15–18.
Millerson, G. (1964b). The qualifying associations: A study in professionalisation. London: Routledge. Republished 2003.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mishra, A. (2012). China has become the preferred destination for medical education. University World News. http://Www.Universityworldnews.Com/Article.Php?Story=20120904100946519.
Moen, P., & Roehling, P. (2005). The career mystique: Cracks in the American dream. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Nichols, R. (2010). Postcolonial studies and the discourse of Foucault: Survey of a field of problematization. Foucault Studies, 9, 111–144.
O’Neill, O. (2002). A question of trust. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Olmstead, A., & Rhode, P. (2004a). An impossible undertaking: The eradication of bovine tuberculosis in the United States. The Journal of Economic History, 64(3), 734–772.
Olmstead, A., & Rhode, P. (2004b). The ‘Tuberculous cattle trust’: Disease contagion in an era of regulatory uncertainty. The Journal of Economic History, 64(4), 929–963.
Olmstead, A., & Rhode, P. (2015). Arresting contagion: Science, policy, and conflicts over animal disease control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Otto, M. (2017). Teeth: The story of beauty, inequality, and the struggle for oral health in America. New York: New Press.
Papps, E., & Olssen, M. (1997). Doctoring childbirth and regulating midwifery in New Zealand: A Foucauldian perspective. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Dunmore.
Parsons, T. (1951). Social structure and dynamic process: The case of modern medical practice. In T. Parsons (Ed.), The social system (pp. 428–479). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Perkin, H. (1969). The origins of modern English society, 1771–1880. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Perkin, H. (1981). Professionalism and property: English society since 1880. Reading, UK: University of Reading.
Perkin, H. (1989). The rise of professional society. London: Routledge.
Perkin, H. (1996). The third revolution: Professional elites in the modern world. London: Routledge.
Pratt, M. (1992). Imperial eyes. London: Routledge.
Pugh, L. (1962). From farriery to veterinary medicine, 1785–1795. Cambridge, UK: Heffer & Sons.
Radkau, J. (2009). Max Weber: A biography. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Reader, W. J. (1966). Professional men: The rise of the professional classes in nineteenth-century England. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Reiger, K. (2008). Domination or mutual recognition? Professional subjectivity in midwifery and obstetrics. Social Theory & Health, 6(2), 132–147.
Robertson, R. (1992). Globalisation: Social theory and social culture. London: Sage.
Saks, M. (2005). Professions and the public interest: Medical power, altruism and alternative medicine. London: Routledge.
Shaw, G. B. (1911). The doctor’s dilemma. New York: Brentano. https://openlibrary.org/publishers/Brentano’s.
Siegrist, H. (1990). Professionalisation as a process: Patterns, progression and discontinuity. In M. C. Burrage & R. Torstendahl (Eds.), Professions in theory and history: Rethinking the study of professions (pp. 177–202). London: Sage.
Smith, A. (2018 [1778]). Wealth of nations (Vol. 8). http://www.adamsmith.org/quotes.
Smithcors, J. F. (1958). Veterinary public health matters in colonial America. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association, 132(5), 194–201.
Spree, R. (1980). The impact of the professionalisation of physicians on social change in Germany during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 15, 24–39.
Steinmetz, G. (2010). Ideas in exile: Refugees from Nazi Germany and the failure to transplant historical sociology into the United States. International Journal of Politics, Culture, & Society, 23(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-009-9062-z.
Steinmetz, G. (2011). Bourdieu, historicity, and historical sociology. Cultural Sociology, 5(1), 45–66.
Steinmetz, G. (2013). Major contributions to sociological theory and research on empire 1830s–present. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), Sociology and empire: The imperial entanglements of a discipline (pp. 1–50). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Susskind, R., & Susskind, D. (2015). The future of professions: How technology will transform the work of human experts. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Torstendahl, R., & Burrage, M. C. (Eds.). (1990). The formation of professions: Knowledge, state and strategy. London: Sage.
Vallis, R. (2011). A veterinary awakening: The history of government veterinarians in Australia. Canberra, ACT: Department of Agriculture, Fisheries & Forestry.
Van Kreiken, R. (2003, September 23–26). Legal reasoning as a field of knowledge production: Luhman, Bourdieu and law’s autonomy. ESA Spanish Sociological Association. University of Murcia, Spain.
Varul, M. (2010). Talcott Parsons, the sick role and chronic illness. Body and Society, 16(2), 72–94.
Vollmer, H. M., & Mills, D. L. (Eds.). (1966). Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Wagner, P. (2001). Modernity: One or many? In J. Blau (Ed.), Blackwell companion to sociology (pp. 30–42). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Wagner, P. (2010). Multiple trajectories of modernity: Why social theory needs historical sociology. Thesis Eleven, 100, 53–60.
Wilensky, H. L. (1964). The professionalization of everyone? American Journal of Sociology, 70(2), 137–158.
Wilentz, S. (2005). The rise of American democracy: Jefferson to Lincoln. New York: Norton.
Witz, A. (1992). Professions and patriarchy. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burns, E.A. (2019). Periodising Professions History. In: Theorising Professions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27935-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27935-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27934-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27935-6
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)