Skip to main content

Yielding Light Signal Evaluation for Self-driving Vehicle and Pedestrian Interaction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1026))

Abstract

An external Human-Machine-Interface (eHMI) signaling the vehicle’s intended movements facilitates pedestrians’ encounters with self-driving vehicles (SDV). However, there is no standard for automated driving system (ADS) lamps today. This study compares the efficacy of a steady, a flashing and a sweeping light signal to communicate an SDV’s intention to yield. The eHMI designs were evaluated at an unsignalized intersection with participants crossing in front of a yielding Wizard-of-Oz SDV. We analyzed crossing behavior and conducted questionnaires and structured interviews with N = 30 participants to identify eHMI design recommendations. Our research provides evidence that a steady and a flashing signal facilitate user experience, learnability and likeability more than a sweeping light. With a flashing signal, pedestrians tend to cross sooner compared to a sweeping signal, and thus improving traffic flow. Design adjustments to the present signals are proposed. This paper provides guidance in the development of a standardized yielding light signal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. SAE International: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles (J3016) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Šucha, M., Dostal, D., Risser, R.: Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings. Accid. Anal. Prev. 102, 41–50 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahadevan, K., Somanath, S., Sharlin, E.: Communicating awareness and intent in autonomous vehicle-pedestrian interaction. In: 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Matthews, M., Chowdhary, G.V., Kieson, E.: Intent communication between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lagström, T., Lundgren, V.M.: Automated vehicle’s interaction with pedestrians (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rothenbücher, D., Li, J., Sirkin, D., Mok, B., Ju, W.: Ghost driver: a field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles. In: 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 795–802 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stadler, S., Cornet, H., Theoto, T.N., Frenkler, F.: A tool, not a toy: using virtual reality to evaluate the communication between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians. In: tom Dieck, M.C., Jung, T. (eds.) Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality, pp. 203–216. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Merat, N., Louw, T., Madigan, R., Wilbrink, M., Schieben, A.: What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully automated road transport systems in shared space? Accid. Anal. Prev. 118, 244–252 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Petzoldt, T., Schleinitz, K., Banse, R.: The potential safety effects of a frontal brake light for motor vehicles. Intell. Transp. Syst. 12, 449–453 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. UNECE. https://wiki.unece.org/download/attachments/78742442/AVSR-04-05e.docx?api=v2

  11. ISO: Road Vehicles: Ergonomic aspects of external visual communication from automated vehicles to other road users (ISO/TR 23049:2018) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. SAE International: Automated Driving System (ADS) Marker Lamp (J3134_201905) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dietrich, A., Willrodt, J.-H., Wagner, K., Bengler, K.: Projection-based external human machine interfaces: Enabling interaction between automated vehicles and pedestrians. In: 17th European VR, Driving Simulation and Virtual Reality Conference, pp. 43–50 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Werner, A.: New colors for autonomous driving: an evaluation of chromaticities for the external lighting equipment of autonomous vehicles. Colour Turn 1, 1–15 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. The Ford Motor Company. https://media.ford.com/content/fordmedia/fna/us/en/news/2017/13/ford-virginia-tech-autonomous-vehicle-human-testing.html

  16. UEQ Data Analysis Tool. https://www.ueq-online.org/Material/Short_UEQ_Data_Analysis_Tool.xlsx

  17. Bartneck, C., Kulic, D., Croft, E., Zoghbi, S.: Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 71–81 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mayring, P.: Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefanie M. Faas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Faas, S.M., Baumann, M. (2020). Yielding Light Signal Evaluation for Self-driving Vehicle and Pedestrian Interaction. In: Ahram, T., Karwowski, W., Pickl, S., Taiar, R. (eds) Human Systems Engineering and Design II. IHSED 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1026. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27928-8_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics