Skip to main content

Insights from the Contemporary Contradictions in Science–Society Relationship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Participatory Research in the Post-Normal Age
  • 374 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter is conceived to explore a broad range of situations in which contemporary contradictions towards science–society relationships are posing demands and opportunities for cognitive inclusion and knowledge democracy. Regardless of any case or dilemma discussed, I propose to raise epistemological issues and current debates about inherent complexity in association with practical experiences that can testify possibilities and real relevance for participatory research approaches. For that matter, it is necessary to browse from the simple to the complex, as from the local multilayered problems to global conditionings related to unsustainability. Such a frame makes necessary reflexive discussions on inter- and transdisciplinarity associated with post-normal problems, and then ecology of knowledge is presented as a convergent alternative with dialogical and participatory research. In the interplay of contemporary threats and science misuse, some evidence of oppression can be recognized. Moreover, the nature of ruptures among society in terms of knowledge and power possession can be related to extreme circumstances, sometimes at the basis of disasters of cognitive exclusion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bartram, J., & Cairncross, S. (2010). Hygiene, sanitation, and water: Forgotten foundations of health. PLoS Medicine, 7, e1000367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1999). Modernidade e ambivalência. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benessia, A., & De Marchi, B. (2017). When the earth shakes… and science with it. The management and communication of uncertainty in the L’Aquila earthquake. Futures, 91, 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10, 1251–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. (1992). Popular epidemiology and toxic waste contamination: Lay and professional ways of knowing. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 33, 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brydon-Miller, M., Greenwood, D., & Maguire, P. (2003). Why action research? Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carrillo-Santisteve, P., & Lopalco, P. L. (2012). Measles still spreads in Europe: Who is responsible for the failure to vaccinate? Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 18, 50–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, S., Watts, V., McCormick, A. K. H. G., & Young, S. (2008). Building and maintaining trust in a community-based participatory research partnership. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldas M das GC. (2017). Vozes e silenciamento em Mariana: crime ou desastre ambiental. 2nd ed. BCCL/Unicamp, Campinas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dankel, D. J., Vaage, N. S., & van der Sluijs, J. P. (2017). Post-normal science in practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M., & Martin, T. (2009). Mining market cycles and tailings dam incidents. In 13th International Conference on Tailings and Mine Waste, Banff, AB. Retrieved from http://www.infomine.com/publications/docs/Davies2009.pdf

  • de Alvarenga, A., de Souza Alvarez, A., Sommerman, A., & Philippi, A., Jr. (2015). Capítulo 2 Interdisciplinaridade e transdisciplinaridade nas tramas da complexidade e desafios aos processos investigativos. In A. Philippi Jr. & V. Fernandes (Eds.), Práticas da interdisciplinaridade no ensino e pesquisa (pp. 37–89). Barueri: Manole.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas, C. M., de S. Porte, M. F., & Gomez, C. M. (1995). Acidentes químicos ampliados: um desafio para a saúde pública. Revista de Saúde Pública, 29, 503–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Marchi, B., & Ravetz, J. R. (1999). Risk management and governance: a post-normal science approach. Futures, 31, 743–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa Santos, B. (2004). A universidade no século XXI: para uma reforma democrática e emancipatória da universidade. São Paulo: Cortez.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa Santos, B. (2007). Para além do pensamento abissal: das linhas globais a uma ecologia de saberes. Novos estudos-CEBRAP, 79, 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa Santos, B. (2009a). Una epistemología del sur: la reinvención del conocimiento y la emancipación social. México: CLACSO y Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Sousa Santos, B. (2009b). Um discurso sobre as ciências (6th ed.). São Paulo: Cortez.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Toledo, R. F., & Giatti, L. L. (2014). Challenges to participation in action research. Health Promotion International, 30, 162–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Toledo, R. F., Giatti, L. L., & Pelicioni, M. C. F. (2012). Mobilização Social em Saúde e Saneamento em Processo de Pesquisa-ação em uma Comunidade Indígena no Noroeste Amazônico. Saúde e Sociedade, 21, 206–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., et al. (2010). Resilience thinking: Integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15, 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge. Selected Interviews and Other Writings of Michel Foucault. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.; D. Macedo, introduction). 30th anniversary ed. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freitas, M., Alves, E., Santo, M., & Portella, S. (2016). O desastre da Samarco/VALE/BHP: Análise crítica de alguns discursos, racionalidades e percepções. Ciência e Cultura, 68, 51–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25, 739–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, L. C., Ribeiro, D. B., Oliveira Roque, F., et al. (2017). Brazil’s worst mining disaster: Corporations must be compelled to pay the actual environmental costs. Ecological Applications, 27, 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giatti, L. L. (2013). Uma contribuição à ciência pós-normal: aplicações e desafios da ampliação da comunidade de pares em contextos socioambientais e de saúde. São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giatti, L. L. (2015). O paradigma da ciência pós-normal: participação social na produção de saberes e na governança socioambiental e da saúde. São Paulo: Annablume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giatti, L. L., Landin, R., & de Toledo, R. F. (2014). Aplicabilidade da ecologia de saberes em saúde e ambiente e sua permeabilidade na produção acadêmica. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 19, 4091–4102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giatti, L. L., Rocha, A. A., de Toledo, R. F., et al. (2007). Condições sanitárias e socioambientais em Iauaretê, área indígena em São Gabriel da Cachoeira, AM. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 12, 1711–1723. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232007000600032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M. (1999). Science’s new social contract with society. Nature, 402, C81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., et al. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, P. (2014a). Evidence based policy: A quixotic challenge. Address given at the invitation of the science policy research unit. Brighton, UK: University of Sussex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gluckman, P. (2014b). The art of science advice to government. Nature, 507, 163–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. (2015). Beyond epistemicide: Knowledge democracy and higher education. Available in: http://unescochair-cbrsr.org/unesco/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Beyond_Epistemicide_final.pdf (accessed 14 September 2019).

  • Hansson, S. O. (2017). Science denial as a form of pseudoscience. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 63, 39–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hochman, G. (2011). Vacinação, varíola e uma cultura da imunização no Brasil. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 16, 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J. (2015). How culture shapes the climate change debate. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, M. (2007). The appliance of science. The Guardian, 14, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel, B. A., Schulz, A. J., Parker, E. A., & Becker, A. B. (2008). Critical issues in developing and following community-based participatory research principles. In M. Minkler & N. Wallerstein (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 47–62). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, P. R. (2015). Meio ambiente, riscos e aprendizagem social. Revista Cadernos de Pesquisa: Pensamento Educacional 10:346–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, P. J., Dunlap, R. E., & Freeman, M. (2008). The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism. Environmental Politics, 17, 349–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (1988). The Bhopal disaster and the right to know. Social Science & Medicine, 27, 1113–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. (2008). O mapa fantasma. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2012). Adaptive and integrative governance on risk and uncertainty. Journal of Risk Research, 15, 273–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. A. (1992). A estrutura das revoluções científicas. Perspectiva: São Paulo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., et al. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7, 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leff, E. (2017). Power-knowledge relations in the field of political ecology. Ambiente & Sociedade, 20, 225–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2, 34–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Anklam, E., et al. (2018). Comparative, collaborative, and integrative risk governance for emerging technologies. Environment Systems and Decisions, 38, 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, D. (2006). Action research cycles for multiple futures perspectives. Futures, 38, 673–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucero, J. E., Wright, K. E., & Reese, A. (2017). Trust development in CBPR partnerships. In N. Wallerstein, B. Duran, J. G. Oetzel, & M. Minkler (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity (p. 61). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaia, A. A. S., Takahashi, M. A. C., Maeda, S. T., et al. (2018). Laboratório de Mudança: uma metodologia formative, participative e sistêmica para criação e transformação de sistemas de atividade. In R. F. de Toledo et al. (Eds.), Pesquisa Participativa em Saúde: Vertentes e Veredas. São Paulo, Brasil: Instituto de Saúde.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manoj, B. S., & Baker, A. H. (2007). Communication challenges in emergency response. Communications of the ACM, 50, 51–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, B. S. (2016). Revisitando o desastre de Bhopal: os tempos da violência e as latitudes da memória. Sociologias, 18, 116–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (2005). Biologia, ciência única. São Paulo: Editora Companhia das Letras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin, E. (2010). Ciência com consciência (14th ed.). Bertrand: Rio de Janeiro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nederland, C., & Groupe, U. R. D. (2013). Reaching resilience: Handbook 2.0 for aid practitioners and policymakers in disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation and poverty reduction. CARE Nederland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H. (2004). The potential of transdisciplinarity. In H. Dunin-Woyseth & M. Nielsen (Eds.), Discussing transdisciplinarity: Making professions and the new mode of knowledge production, the Nordic reader (pp. 10–19). Oslo: Oslo School of Architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pachauri, R. K., Mayer, L., & Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Eds.). (2015). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Geneva: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Querol, M. A. P., Jackson Filho, J. M., & Cassandre, M. P. (2011). Change laboratory: uma proposta metodológica para pesquisa e desenvolvimento da Aprendizagem Organizacional. Administração: Ensino e Pesquisa, 12, 609–640.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, J. (2004). The post-normal science of precaution. Futures, 36, 347–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raynaut, C. (2011). Interdisciplinaridade: mundo contemporâneo, complexidade e desafios à produção e à aplicação de conhecimentos. Interdisciplinaridade em ciência, tecnologia & inovação (pp. 143–208). Barueri: Manole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex. World London: Earthscan Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • San Sebastián, M., & Hurtig, A. K. (2005). Oil development and health in the Amazon basin of Ecuador: The popular epidemiology process. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 799–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (2015). Spaces of practices and of large social phenomena (p. 24). Montreal: Espaces Temps.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, J. (1999). Sobre a maneira de transmissão do cólera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand, R. (2017). Post-normal science. In Routledge Handbook of Ecological Economics (pp. 288–298). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thiollent, M. (2011). Metodologia da Pesquisa-Ação (18th ed.). São Paulo: Cortez.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsukahara, T. (2017). Commentary: New currents in science: The challenge of quality, examining the discrepancies and incongruities between Japanese techno-scientific policy and the citizens’ science movement in post-3/11 Japan. Futures, 91, 84–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valencio, N. (2016). Elementos constitutivos de um desastre catastrófico: os problemas científicos por detrás dos contextos críticos. Ciência e Cultura, 68, 41–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Hove, S. (2000). Participatory approaches to environmental policy-making: The European commission climate policy process as a case study. Ecological Economics, 33, 457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vormittag, E. D. M. P. A., Araujo, D., Oliveira, M. A. D., & Gleriano, J. S. (2018). Health evaluation of the Barra Longa population affected by the disaster in Mariana County. Ambiente & Sociedade, 21, e01222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S. R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9, 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2010). Community-based participatory research contributions to intervention research: the intersection of science and practice to improve health equity. American Journal of Public Health, 100 Suppl 1, S40–S46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N., & Duran, B. (2017). Theoretical, historical, and practice roots of CBPR. In N. Wallerstein, B. Duran, J. G. Oetzel, & M. Minkler (Eds.), Community-based participatory research for health: Advancing social and health equity (p. 17). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, N., Giatti, L. L., Bógus, C. M., et al. (2017). Shared participatory research principles and methodologies: Perspectives from the USA and Brazil—45 years after Paulo Freire’s “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”. Societies, 7, 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E. (2007). Social learning towards a sustainable world: Principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wanderley, L. J., Mansur, M. S., Milanez, B., & Pinto, R. G. (2016). Desastre da Samarco/Vale/BHP no Vale do Rio Doce: aspectos econômicos, políticos e socio ambientais. Ciência e Cultura, 68, 30–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildemeersch D (2007) Social learning revisited: Lessons learned from north and south. In Wildemeersch D, Wals AEJ Social learning towards a more sustainable world Wageningen University Press, Wageningen, 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willey, R. J., Crowl, D. A., Lepkowski, W. (2005). The Bhopal tragedy: its influence on process and community safety as practiced in the United States. Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 18:365–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization—WHO. (2018). Europe observes a 4-fold increase in measles cases in 2017 compared to previous year (p. 6). Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xavier, L. Y., Jacobi, P. R., Turra, A. (2018). On the advantages of working together: Social Learning and knowledge integration in the management of marine areas. Marine Policy 88:139–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Giatti, L.L. (2019). Insights from the Contemporary Contradictions in Science–Society Relationship. In: Participatory Research in the Post-Normal Age. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27924-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics