Skip to main content

Rewriting France’s Future: From Louis-Sébastien Mercier’s Pre-Revolutionary Projections to Michel Houellebecq’s Islamic Agendas via Secular State Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ethical Futures and Global Science Fiction

Part of the book series: Studies in Global Science Fiction ((SGSF))

  • 739 Accesses

Abstract

Futuristic fiction found its niche with Louis-Sébastien Mercier’s premonitory novel L’An 2440: Rêve s’il en fut jamais (1771). Since then, Paris—the City of Light—has been transformed through literary and filmic futuristic projections into a nightmarish city of dark. Dutton asks whether the secular ethics propounded via the French Revolution and its aftermath can accommodate positive utopian futures for France, looking at French speculative narratives from the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. She then examines Michel Houellebecq’s Soumission (2015), which re-imagines the future of France under fundamentalist Islamic rule. By considering the Islamic agenda of this recent novel in the context of historical secular ethics in French utopianism, Dutton discerns a new discourse on religion in futuristic fiction that could reorient writing on France’s future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In-text references of French quotes are from the 1999 publication of the 1771 edition: Mercier, L’An 2440; English quotes are from W. Hooper’s translation: Mercier, Memoirs.

  2. 2.

    Alkon, Origins of Futuristic Fiction. See also: Ransom, “Alternate History.”

  3. 3.

    In-text references of French quotes are from Houellebecq, Soumission; English quotes are from Lorin Stein’s translation: Houellebecq, Submission.

  4. 4.

    Forsström, Possible Worlds.

  5. 5.

    Forsström notes that this text is likely translated and adapted from a German novel by Johann Gottlob Benjamin Pfeil. Forsström, Possible Worlds, 33.

  6. 6.

    Wilkie, “Mercier’s L’An 2440,” 16.

  7. 7.

    Forsström, Possible Worlds, 43.

  8. 8.

    Wilkie, “Mercier’s L’An 2440,” 16.

  9. 9.

    Rufi, Le Rêve.

  10. 10.

    Trousson, “Sciences et Religion en 2440.”

  11. 11.

    Garrioch, Making of Revolutionary Paris, 1–14.

  12. 12.

    In-text references are from Verne, Paris au XXe siècle.

  13. 13.

    There has been some confusion as to the authorship of this anonymously published work, but the attribution to Léo Lespès (Timothée Trimm) (1815–1875) seems implausible given that an updated edition was published in 1908 of Les Ruines de Paris en 4908, and Lespès died in 1875. See: Jean de Palacio, Le Silence du texte, 235; Marie-France David de Palacio, Reviviscences romaines, 109n22. Léo Lespès wrote Les Ruines de Paris: Chronique du Paris brûlé (Paris: Imprimerie nationale, 1871), which adds to the confusion.

  14. 14.

    Alternative or alternate history is a popular sub-genre of uchronia, as noted by Alkon, Origins of Futuristic Fiction, 115, and a list of “what if” works can be found at http://www.uchronia.net/

  15. 15.

    Ludlow, “Sur la pierre blanche,” 623.

  16. 16.

    Taylor, Secular Age.

  17. 17.

    Gay, The Enlightenment. See, for example: Barnett, Enlightenment and Religion.

  18. 18.

    French National Constituent Assembly, Declaration, preamble.

  19. 19.

    Powers, Confronting Evil, 5.

  20. 20.

    Beckford, “Laïcité,” 27–40.

  21. 21.

    Jones, “Beneath the Veil.”

  22. 22.

    See: “Déclaration universelle”; “Laïcité: les débats”; “De la Révolution Française.”

  23. 23.

    Barras, “Sacred Laïcité.”

  24. 24.

    Chemin, “Jean Baubérot.”

  25. 25.

    Devichand, “How the World.”

  26. 26.

    For example: Leménager, “Houellebecq.”

  27. 27.

    In October 2015, Bannon mentioned the text in an interview, saying: “It’s been almost a Camp of the Saints type invasion into Central and then Western and Northern Europe”; later saying on a Breitbart podcast in January 2016: “The whole thing in Europe is all about immigration. It’s a global issue today—this kind of global Camp of the Saints”; and again in April 2016: “When we first started talking about this a year ago, we called it the Camp of the Saints … I mean, this is Camp of the Saints, isn’t it?” Quoted in Blumenthal and Rieger, “This Stunningly Racist.”

  28. 28.

    After consideration by the Supreme Court, this travel ban is now enforceable against citizens of six Muslim-majority countries. McCarthy and Laughland, “Trump Travel Ban.”

  29. 29.

    Albertini, “L’un des livres favoris.”

  30. 30.

    Blumenthal and Rieger, “This Stunningly Racist.”

  31. 31.

    Chrostek, Utopie; Giri, “En quête”; Wesemael, Michel Houellebecq; Sweeney, Michel Houellebecq; Morrey, Michel Houellebecq; Betty, Without God.

  32. 32.

    Onfray, Miroir du nihilisme.

  33. 33.

    Betty, Without God, 47.

  34. 34.

    In an interesting attempt at categorising media reactions to Soumission according to French or English language reporting, Joseph Voignac suggests that while reactions to the novel in France focus on integration, insecurity and Islamophobia, the Anglophone press brings out the author’s “real” themes: the moral and sexual misery of a world without religion, and France’s place in the world. Voignac, “Michel Houellebecq.”

  35. 35.

    Sénécal, “Michel Houellebecq.”

  36. 36.

    Sénécal, “Michel Houellebecq.”

  37. 37.

    Chrisafis, “Michel Houellebecq.”

  38. 38.

    Novak-Lechevalier, “La religión.”

  39. 39.

    Lorentzen, “Nobody.”

  40. 40.

    Chaudey and Denis, “Michel Houellebecq”; Novak-Lechevalier, “La religión.”

  41. 41.

    Baird, Studies in Pascal’s Ethics, 56–84.

  42. 42.

    See also: Chaouat, “Houellebecq’s Wager.”

  43. 43.

    Novak-Lechevalier posits that François does not necessarily convert, given this conditional tense. Novak-Lechevalier, “Soumission.”

  44. 44.

    Sauvaget, “Macron.”

Works Cited

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dutton, J. (2020). Rewriting France’s Future: From Louis-Sébastien Mercier’s Pre-Revolutionary Projections to Michel Houellebecq’s Islamic Agendas via Secular State Ethics. In: Kendal, Z., Smith, A., Champion, G., Milner, A. (eds) Ethical Futures and Global Science Fiction. Studies in Global Science Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27893-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics