Abstract
Philosopher Günther Anders’ thoughts on the interaction between human beings and technological artifacts have proven to be remarkably applicable to current technological developments. The main thesis of this chapter is that Anders’ philosophical anthropology and his concept of “the obsolescence of human beings” are also highly relevant for current debates about legal personhood. Throughout its history, the legal concept of the person has gone through several waves of naturalization and artificialization. At the moment, the legal person is experiencing a wave of artificialization in response to technological developments. A certain tendency can be detected to artificialize the legal concept of the natural person, that is, to “liberate the legal person” from its naturalistic confines and humanistic premises. As a consequence, the gap between homo and persona, between flesh-and-blood human beings and legal persons, is widening. This raises the question as to whether the legal category of the natural person has had its best time and is even becoming obsolete. I use Anders’ essay On Promethean Shame as a lens to critically examine the current transformation of the legal concept of the natural person. I argue that the legal notion of the natural person is indispensable for the regulation of new technologies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Anders, G 2002a, ‘Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen 1’, in Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution, C.H. Beck, München.
Anders, G 2002b, ‘Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen 2’, in Über die Zerstörung des Lebens im Zeitalter der dritten industriellen Revolution, C.H. Beck, München.
Anders, G 2016, ‘On Promethean Shame’, in CJ Müller (ed.), Prometheanism: technology, digital culture and human obsolescence, Rowman & Littlefield, London, pp. 29–95.
Bostrom, N 2014, Superintelligence, paths, dangers, strategies, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Dewey, J 1926, ‘The historic background of corporate legal personality’, Yale Law Journal, vol. 35, pp. 655–673.
Grear, A 2007, ‘Challenging corporate ‘humanity’, legal disembodiment, embodiment and human rights’, Human Rights Law Review, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 511–543.
Grear, A 2013, ‘Law’s entities: complexity, plasticity and justice’, Jurisprudence, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 76–101.
Greely, H 2016, The end of sex and the future of reproduction, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Habermas, J 2003, The future of human nature, Polity Press, Cambridge.
Harari, YN 2016, Homo Deus: a brief history of tomorrow, Penguin, London.
Iacub, M 2002, Penser les droits de la naissance, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
Kelly, K 2010, What technology wants, Penguin, London.
Kurzweil, R 2006, The singularity is near, when human transcend biology, Penguin, London.
Naffine, N 2009, Law’s meaning of life, philosophy, religion, Darwin and the legal person, Hart, Oxford.
Naffine, N 2011, ‘Review essay: liberating the legal person’, Canadian Journal of Law and Society, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 193–203.
Stern (Anders), G 1937, ‘“Pathologie de la Liberté”, Essai sur la Non-Identification’, Recherches philosophiques, vol. VI, pp. 22–54.
Thomas, Y 2002, Du droit de ne pas naître, Gallimard, Paris.
Van Beers, BC 2017, ‘The changing nature of law’s natural person, the impact of emerging technologies on the legal concept of the person’, German Law Journal, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 559–594.
Van Beers, BC 2018, ‘“The best me I can possibly be”, legal subjectivity self authorship and wrongful life actions in an age of genomic torts’, in B van Beers, S Sterckx & D Dickenson (eds), Personalised medicine, individual choice and the common good, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 200–225.
Zittelman, E 1873, Begriff und Wesen der sogenannten juristischen Personen, Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Beers, B. (2020). “The Obsolescence of Human Beings” and the Non-obsolescence of Law’s Natural Persons: Transformations of Legal Personhood Through the Lens of “Promethean Shame”. In: de Leeuw, M., van Wichelen, S. (eds) Personhood in the Age of Biolegality. Biolegalities. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27848-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27848-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27847-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27848-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)