Skip to main content

Facilitating Treatment Integrity in Penitentiary and Forensic Psychiatric Institutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Assessment and Obligatory Treatment of Violent and Sexually Violent Offenders

Abstract

In this chapter, suggestions are made on how to facilitate treatment integrity regarding treatment, therapists, offenders, and institutions. Strategies to assess integrity are discussed, followed by comments concerning the maintenance of treatment integrity. Finally, some conclusions and recommendations are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Psychological Association. (2002). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 57, 1060–1073. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.557.12.1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychological Association, Presidential Task Force on Evidence-Based Practice. (2006). Evidence-based practice in psychology. American Psychologist, 61, 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, G. (2009). Using the internet to provide cognitive behaviour therapy. Behavior Research and Therapy, 47, 175–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Matthew Bender & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2007). Risk-need responsivity model for offender assessment and rehabilitation. Ottawa: Public Safety Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., & Philip, L. (2001). To treat or not to treat? An empirical perspective. In C. R. Hollin (Ed.), Handbook of offender assessment and treatment (pp. 17–34). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, Y. M., Shingler, J., & Marshall, W. L. (2006). Putting “behavior” back into cognitive-behavioral treatment of sexual offenders. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, L. E. Marshall, & G. A. Serran (Eds.), Sexual offender treatment. Controversial issues (pp. 211–224). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P. (1996). Offender rehabilitation: What we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 144–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P., & Andrews, D. A. (1991). Correctional program evaluation inventory (2nd ed.). St. John: University of New Brunswick.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, S. N., & O’Brien, W. H. (2000). Principles and practice of behavioral assessment. New York: Plenum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hollin, C. R. (1995). The meaning and implications of “treatment integrity”. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending-guidelines from research and practice (pp. 195–208). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollin, C. R. (1999). Treatment therapies for offenders. Meta-analysis, “What works” and beyond. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 22(3–4), 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (1986). Comparative outcome studies of psychotherapy: Methodological issues and strategies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.54.1.95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E. (2003). Research design in clinical psychology (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, C. G., Dolley, O., & Hollin, C. (2013). Engagement in psychosocial treatment: Its relationship to outcome and care pathway progress for women in medium-secure settings. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 22, 336–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGivern, J. E., & Walter, M. J. (2014). Legal and ethical issues related to treatment integrity in psychology and education. In H. L. M. Sanetti & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Treatment integrity: A foundation for evidence-based practice in applied psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, N. (2009). Editorial: Improvers, adapters and rejectors: The link between “evidence-based practice” and “evidence-based practitioners”. Clinical Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 14, 323–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104509104045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perepletchikova, F. (2014). Assessment of treatment integrity in psychotherapy research, Chapter 6. In L. M. Hagermoser Sanetti & T. R. Kratochwill (Eds.), Treatment integrity: A foundation for evidence-based practice in applied psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perepletchikova, F., Treat, T. A., & Kazdin, A. E. (2007). Treatment integrity in psychotherapy research: Analysis of the studies and examination of the associated factors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 829–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanetti, L. M. H., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2009). Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction of the special school series. School Psychology Review, 38, 445–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanetti, L. M. H., Kratochwill, T. R., & Long, A. C. J. (2013). Applying adult behavior change theory to support mediator-based intervention implementation. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • University of Cincinnati. (2008). Evidence-based Correctional Program Checklist (CPC) training protocol. Cincinnati, OH: The University of Cincinnati Corrections Institute, University of Cincinnati. Retrieved from http://www.uc.edu/criminaljustice

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, J. S., & Chou, S. (2015). The effectiveness of psychological treatment for reducing recidivism in child molesters: A systematic review of randomized and nonrandomized studies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16, 401–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380145379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. (2002). Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: Promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(01)00076-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. B., Bouffard, L. A., & Mackenzie, D. L. (2005). A quantitative review of structured, group-oriented, cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32, 172–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854804272889

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruud H. J. Hornsveld .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kraaimaat, F.W., Hornsveld, R.H.J. (2019). Facilitating Treatment Integrity in Penitentiary and Forensic Psychiatric Institutions. In: Hornsveld, R., Kraaimaat, F., Gijs, L., Palmer, E. (eds) Assessment and Obligatory Treatment of Violent and Sexually Violent Offenders. Advances in Preventing and Treating Violence and Aggression . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27840-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics