Skip to main content

The Role of Quality in Wine Production and Market: European Rules, CAP and New Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A History of Wine in Europe, 19th to 20th Centuries, Volume II

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Economic History ((PEHS))

  • 767 Accesses

Abstract

Starting from the 60s the main changes which characterized the wine sector were mainly related to the product quality differentiation. The new Common Agricultural Policy contributed to improve and diversify the quality of the wine among different kind of wines with different origin: the aim was to create wines for all target consumers. Both wine producers and retailers played an important role due to their strategic position along the supply chain and their structural characteristics. The changes concerning quality differentiation of wines included both processes, logistic along the supply chain and the market recognition of quality attributes of wines through labelling. The respect of new labels obliged winemakers to improve the quality of their products: the flavours of new quality wines were able to encounter the consumers’ tastes and enlarge the wine market.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Please note that the word “European” is used here with the meaning of “belonged to European Economic Community (since 1992, to European Union)”, that is “regulated by the CAP ”. A wide bibliography exists about this last. See, in particular, references quoted in: Cunha and Swinbank (2011), Tedeschi (2011), Kay and Ackrill (2010), and Spoerer (2010).

  2. 2.

    A wide bibliography exists about technological innovations concerning the winegrowing and winemaking in European countries: see, in particular, the Volume 1 and references it quoted.

  3. 3.

    A wide bibliography exists about changes in the wine market : besides chapters in this volume (and references they quoted), see Anderson and Pinilla (2018), Anderson et al. (2017), and Dougherty (2012). See also Eurostat reports and, in particular, as well as the reform of the EU wine market in the EU Commission portal (https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/wine/reforms_en).

  4. 4.

    In 2013 Italian wine export represented 15% of national agri-food export. Among the first twenty food products exported, PDO and PGI wines played a very important role. Moreover, the 48% of cultivated land was used for PDO and PGI wines. In the northern Italy there existed the higher concentration of PDO wines: in most of terroirs more than 70% of wine production was used for PDO wines and this percentage increased up 80 in Lombardy. In Italy some exceptions were represented by Toscana and Sardinia only. In a context highlighting a negative trend concerning the cultivated land, the wine production had a positive trend together with the price of PDO and PGI wines. See Inea (2014), Ismea (2007, 2014), and Sardone (2013).

  5. 5.

    A wide bibliography exists about the problem to have a correct labelling which, respecting rules, really attracts consumers and, at the same time, allows producers to realize a quality differentiation. See, among other, Golan et al. (2001), Drichoutis et al. (2006), Kapsak et al. (2008), and Grunert et al. (2010). About wine producers ’ decisions, see also: Carpenter and Humphreys (2019).

  6. 6.

    About the relevance and usefulness of the traceability in the food industry, a wide bibliography exists. See, among others: Golan et al. (2004), Trienekens and Zuurbier (2008), Aung and Chang (2014), and Charlebois et al. (2014).

References

  • Anderson K., Pinilla V. (eds.). (2018), Wine Globalization: A New Comparative History, Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson K., Nelgen S., Pinilla V. (2017), Global Wine Markets, 1860 to 2016: A Statistical Compendium, Adelaide, University of Adelaide Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aung M.M., Chang Y.S. (2014), ‘Traceability in a Food Supply Chain: Safety and Quality Perspectives’, Food Control, pp. 172–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banterle A., Stranieri S. (2008), ‘The Consequences of Voluntary Traceability System for Supply Chain Relationships: An Application of Transaction Cost Economics’, Food Policy, 33(6), pp. 560–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banterle A., Stranieri S. (2013), ‘Sustainability Standards and the Reorganization of Private Label Supply Chains: A Transaction Cost Perspective’, Sustainability, 5(12), pp. 5272–5288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber N., Taylor C., Strick S. (2009), ‘Wine Consumers’ Environmental Knowledge and Attitudes: Influence on Willingness to Purchase’, International Journal of Wine Research, 1(1), pp. 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belletti G., Marescotti A. (2007), ‘Costi e benefici delle denominazioni geografiche (DOP e IGP)’, Agriregioneeuropa, 3(8).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benfratello L., Piacenza M., Sacchetto S. (2009), ‘Taste or Reputation: What Drives Market Prices in the Wine Industry? Estimation of a Hedonic Model for Italian Premium Wines’, Applied Economics, 41(17), pp. 2197–2209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canavari M., Centonze R., Hingley M., Spadoni R. (2010), ‘Traceability as Part of Competitive Strategy in the Fruit Supply Chain’, British Food Journal, 112(2), pp. 171–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter G., Humphreys A. (2019), ‘What the Wine Industry Understands About Connecting with Consumers’, Harvard Business Review [Digital Article].

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlebois S., Sterling B., Haratifar S., Naing S.K. (2014), ‘Comparison of Global Food Traceability Regulations and Requirements’, Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 13(5), pp. 1104–1123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiodo E. (2008), ‘Politiche per la qualità dei prodotti agro-alimentari e ruolo del consumatore’, Agriregioneeuropa, 4(15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Contato R. (2007), ‘The IFS (International Food Safety) and BRC (British Retail Consortium) Standard in Large Distribution’, Industrie Alimentari, 46, pp. 180–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunha, A., Swinbank, A. (2011), An Inside View of the CAP Reform Process: Explaining the MacSharry, Agenda 2000, and Fischler Reforms, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty P.H. (ed.). (2012), Geography of Wine: Regions, Terroirs and Techniques, Dordrecht, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drichoutis A.C., Lazaridis P., Nayga R.M. (2006), ‘Consumers’ Use of Nutritional Labels: A Review of Research Studies and Issues’, Academy of Marketing Science Review, 9(9), pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2015), Data Report: Your Key to European Statistics. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Brussel, Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/vit_esms.htm.

  • Frick B., Simmons R. (2013), ‘The Impact of Individual and Collective Reputation on Wine Prices: Empirical Evidence from the Mosel Valley’, Journal of Business Economics, 83(2), pp. 101–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaeta D., Corsinovi P. (2014), Economics, Governance, and Policy in the Wine Market: European Union Developments, New York, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golan E., Kuchler F., Mitchell L., Greene C., Jessup A. (2001), ‘Economics of Food Labeling’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 24(2), pp. 117–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golan E., Krissoff B., Kuchler F., Calvin L., Nelson K., Price G. (2004), Traceability in the U.S. Food Supply: Economic Theory and Industry Studies, Washington, DC, US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunert K.G., Wills J.M., Fernández-Celemín L. (2010), ‘Nutrition Knowledge, and Use and Understanding of Nutrition Information on Food Labels Among Consumers in the UK’, Appetite, 55(2), pp. 177–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey M., Waye V. (eds.). (2014), Global Wine Regulation, Pyrmont, Thomson Reuters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey M., White L., Frost W. (eds.). (2014), Wine and Identity: Branding, Heritage, Terroir, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzberg A., Malorgio G. (2008), ‘Wine Demand in Italy: An Analysis of Consumer Preferences’, New Medit, 7(4), pp. 40–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEA. (2014), Il commercio con l’estero dei prodotti agro-alimentari, Rome, INEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISMEA. (2007), I vini Doc e Docg. Una mappatura della viticoltura regionale a denominazione d’origine, Rome, ISMEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISMEA. (2014), Vini a denominazione di origine. Struttura, produzione, e mercato. Report aprile 2014, Rome, ISMEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapsak W.R., Schmidt D., Childs N.M., Meunier J., White C. (2008), ‘Consumer Perceptions of Graded, Graphic and Text Label Presentations for Qualified Health Claims’, Critical reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 48(3), pp. 248–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen K.M., Dreyer B., Olsen P., Elvevoll E.O. (2013), ‘Literature Review: Does a Common Theoretical Framework to Implement Food Traceability Exist?’, Food Control, 32, pp. 409–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay A., Ackrill R. (2010), ‘Problems of Composition, Temporality and Change in Tracing the Common Agricultural Policy Through Time’, Journal of European Integration History, 16(2), pp. 123–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y.G., Woo E. (2016), ‘Consumer Acceptance of a Quick Response (QR) Code for the Food Traceability System: Application of an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)’, Food Research International, 85, pp. 266–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klohr B., Fleuchaus R., Theuvsen L. (2013), Sustainability: Implementation Programs and Communication in the Leading Wine Producing Countries. Academy of Wine Business. 7th International Conference of the Awbr, 12–15 June 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landon S., Smith C.E. (1997), ‘The Use of Quality and Reputation Indicators by Consumer: The Case of Bordeaux Wine’, Journal of Consumer Policy, 20, pp. 289–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning L., Soon J.M. (2014), ‘Developing Systems to Control Food Adulteration’, Food Policy, 49, pp. 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller M., Schmidt H.R., Tissot L. (eds.). (2011), Marchés régulés: corporations et cartels, Zürich, Chronos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringsberg H. (2014), ‘Perspectives on Food Traceability: A Systematic Literature Review’, Supply Chain Management, 19(5/6), pp. 558–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sardone R. (2013), ‘I numeri del vino italiano: le tante facce della qualità’, Agriregioneeuropa, 10(39), pp. 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spoerer M. (2010), ‘“Fortress Europe” in Long-Term Perspective: Agricultural Protection in the European Community, 1957–2003’, Journal of European Integration History, 16(2), pp. 143–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tähkäpää S., Maijala R., Korkeala H., Nevas M. (2015), ‘Patterns of Food Frauds and Adulterations Reported in the EU Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed and in Finland’, Food Control, 47, pp. 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarjan L., Senk I., Tegeltija S., Stankovski S., Ostojic G. (2015), ‘A Readability Analysis for QR Code Application in a Traceability System’, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 109, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trienekens J., Zuurbier P. (2008), ‘Quality and Safety Standards in the Food Industry, Development and Challenges’, International Journal of Production Economics, 113, pp. 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedeschi P. (2011), ‘La Politique Agraire Commune ou «le grand cartel agricole communautaire»’, in Müller, Schmidt, Tissot (2011), pp. 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D., Quinton S. (2012), ‘Let’s Talk About Wine: Does Twitter Have Value?’, International Journal of Wine Business Research, 24(4), pp. 271–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu L., Xu L., Zhu D., Wang X. (2012), ‘Factors Affecting Consumer Willingness to Pay for Certified Traceable Food in Jiangsu Province of China’, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60(3), pp. 317–333.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stranieri, S., Tedeschi, P. (2019). The Role of Quality in Wine Production and Market: European Rules, CAP and New Technology. In: Conca Messina, S., Le Bras, S., Tedeschi, P., Vaquero Piñeiro, M. (eds) A History of Wine in Europe, 19th to 20th Centuries, Volume II. Palgrave Studies in Economic History. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27794-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27794-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27793-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27794-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics