Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Graduate Attributes and Games

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Graduate Skills and Game-Based Learning

Part of the book series: Digital Education and Learning ((DEAL))

Abstract

Graduate attributes are the skills and competencies that students are said to develop in higher education, over and above those related directly to their degree subject. They are typically aligned with the notion of life-long learning and, at university level, attributes such as critical thinking, communication skill, and adaptability are associated with graduates’ employability. This chapter describes how video games might relate to the development of graduate attributes, arguing that this is where the utility of games in higher education lies. However, if we are to make any claims about the development of graduate attributes at university, means of measuring gains in attribute attainment are required. Noting that such measurement is not straightforward, potential quantitative measures for a range of typical graduate attributes are discussed. However, attributes which are not readily quantified, such as those concerned with ethical and social awareness or reflective learning, are probably best explored by qualitative means. The chapter concludes by suggesting that, in the absence of quantitative measures, perhaps the most effective method of determining a person’s attribute attainment is simply to ask them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Known as the Spellings’ Commission after the US Secretary of Education (2005–2009), Margaret Spellings.

  2. 2.

    http://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/.

  3. 3.

    https://www.enhancementthemes.ac.uk/completed-enhancement-themes/graduates-for-the-21st-century.

  4. 4.

    https://www.insightassessment.com/Products/Products-Summary/Critical-Thinking-Skills-Tests/California-Critical-Thinking-Skills-Test-CCTST.

  5. 5.

    https://www.gla.ac.uk/students/attributes/yourattributes/investigative/.

  6. 6.

    https://www.mi5.gov.uk/careers/opportunities/investigations.

  7. 7.

    http://www.kcl.ac.uk/aboutkings/principal/dean/akc/AKC-Handbook/starting/values.aspx.

References

  • Barr, M. (2016). Using Video Games to Develop Graduate Attributes: A Pilot Study. In The University of the West of Scotland (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Games Based Learning (pp. 41–49). Paisley, Scotland, UK: Academic Conferences and Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C. (2004). A Research-Based Approach to Generic Graduate Attributes Policy. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(3), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000235391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C. (2006). Understanding What We Mean by the Generic Attributes of Graduates. Higher Education, 51(2), 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6384-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrie, S. C. (2007). A Conceptual Framework for the Teaching and Learning of Generic Graduate Attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701476100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Active Learning: Effects of Core Training Design Elements on Self-Regulatory Processes, Learning, and Adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethesda Softworks. (1994). The Elder Scrolls. Bethesda Softworks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candy, P., Crebert, G., & O’Leary, J. (1994). Developing Lifelong Learners Through Undergraduate Education. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • CD Projekt Red. (2007). The Witcher. Atari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education. AAHE Bulletin. Retrieved November 4, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, A., & Romkey, L. (2012). Adapting Existing Assessment Tools for Use in Assessing Engineering Graduate Attributes. In Proceedings of the 2012 Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA12) Conference, Winnipeg, MB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, M. (2014). Measuring Student Graduateness: Reliability and Construct Validity of the Graduate Skills and Attributes Scale. Higher Education Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.890572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Corte, E. (1996). New Perspectives on Learning and Teaching in Higher Education. In S. A. Burgen (Ed.), Goals and Purposes of Higher Education in the 21st Century (pp. 112–132). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, I., Nixon, I., & Wiltshire, J. (1998). Personal Transferable Skills in Higher Education: The Problems of Implementing Good Practice. Quality Assurance in Education, 6(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684889810200359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, R. L. (1983). Communicative Adaptability: A Measure of Social Communicative Competence. Communication Quarterly, 31(4), 320–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463378309369521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duran, R. L. (1992). Communicative Adaptability: A Review of Conceptualization and Measurement. Communication Quarterly, 40(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01463379209369840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical Thinking Assessment. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. H., & Weir, E. (1985). The Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test. Pacific Grove, CA: Midwest Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensemble Studios. (2002). Age of Mythology. Microsoft Game Studios.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epic Games. (2017). Fortnite. Epic Games.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. Fullerton, CA: Peter A. Facione.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, P. (1991). Using the California Critical Thinking Skills Test in Research, Evaluation, and Assessment. Millbrae, CA: California Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Facione, N. C., Facione, P. A., & Sanchez, C. A. (1994). Critical Thinking Disposition as a Measure of Competent Clinical Judgment: The Development of the California Critical Thinking Disposition Inventory. The Journal of Nursing Education, 33(8), 345–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullbright. (2017). Tacoma. Fullbright.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (2007). What Video Games Have to Teach Us About Learning and Literacy (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, W., Hammer, S., & Star, C. (2009). Facing Up to the Challenge: Why Is It So Hard to Develop Graduate Attributes? Higher Education Research & Development, 28(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360802444339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grim, A. M. (2010). Use of Situational Judgment Test to Measure Individual Adaptability in Applied Settings. Unpublished thesis. George Mason University, Fairfax, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, M., & Clifford, V. A. (2011). Integral Vision: A Multi-Perspective Approach to the Recognition of Graduate Attributes. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(5), 573–584. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.598448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambur, S., Rowe, K., & Luc, L. T. (2002). Graduate Skills Assessment: Stage One Validity Study. Canberra: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hello Games. (2016). No Man’s Sky. Hello Games.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, P. (2005). Assessing Investigative Skills in History: A Case Study from Scotland. History Teacher, 38(3), 341–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., & Gonnella, J. S. (2011). An Instrument for Measuring Pharmacist and Physician Attitudes Towards Collaboration: Preliminary Psychometric Data. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.3109/13561820.2010.483368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hullman, G. A. (2007). Communicative Adaptability Scale: Evaluating Its Use as an ‘Other-Report’ Measure. Communication Reports, 20(2), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210701643693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R. N., & Menon, S. T. (2005). Managerial Resourcefulness: Measuring a Critical Component of Leadership Effectiveness. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/097135570401400103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S. P. (1983). Relationship of Bar Examinations to Performance Tests of Lawyering Skills. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, S., Benjamin, R., Shavelson, R., & Bolus, R. (2007). The Collegiate Learning Assessment: Facts and Fantasies. Evaluation review, 31(5), 415–439. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X07303318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeFort, S. M. (2000). A Test of Braden’s Self-Help Model in Adults with Chronic Pain. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 32(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00153.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievens, F., Peeters, H., & Schollaert, E. (2008). Situational Judgment Tests: A Review of Recent Research. Personnel Review, 37(4), 426–441. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480810877598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxis. (1989). SimCity. Maxis.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C., & McCroskey, L. L. (1988). Self-Report as an Approach to Measuring Communication Competence. Communication Research Reports, 5(2), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824098809359810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1995). Fundamentals of Human Communication: An Interpersonal Perspective. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWhirter, B. T., Burrow-Sanchez, J. J., & Townsend, K. C. (2008). Measuring Learned Resourcefulness in College Students: Factor Structure of the Self-Control Schedule (SCS). College Student Journal, 42(4), 1099–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An Alternative Selection Procedure: The Low-Fidelity Simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(6), 640–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.75.6.640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moy, J. (1999). The Impact of Generic Competencies on Workplace Performance: Review of Research. Leabrook, SA: National Centre for Vocational Education Research. Retrieved May 10, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicol, D. J. (2010). The Foundation for Graduate Attributes: Developing Self-Regulation Through Self and Peer-Assessment. The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nintendo EPD. (2017). The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild. Nintendo.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Code. (2019). Observation. Devolver Digital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ployhart, Robert E., & Paul D. Bliese. (2006). Individual Adaptability (I-ADAPT) Theory: Conceptualizing the Antecedents, Consequences, and Measurement of Individual Differences in Adaptability. In Understanding Adaptability: A Prerequisite for Effective Performance within Complex Environments (Vols. 1–0, Vol. 6, pp. 3–39). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the Workplace: Development of a Taxonomy of Adaptive Performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Borman, W. C., & Hedge, J. W. (2002). Predicting Adaptive Performance: Further Tests of a Model of Adaptability. Human Performance, 15(4), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1504_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V. P. (2002). Socio-communicative Style and Orientation in Instruction: Giving Good Communication and Receiving Good Communication. In J. L. Chesebro & J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Communication for Teachers (pp. 104–115). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (1990). Reliability and Separation of Factors on the Assertiveness-Responsiveness Measure. Psychological Reports, 67, 449–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, R., Ewell, P., Jones, D., & Lenth, C. (1995). Making Quality Count in Undergraduate Education. A Report for the ECS Chairman’s ‘Quality Counts’ Agenda in Higher Education (p. 34). Denver, Colorado: Education Commission of the States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, M. (1980). A Schedule for Assessing Self-Control Behaviors: Preliminary Findings. Behavior Therapy, 11(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(80)80040-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the Self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sam Barlow. (2015). Her Story. Sam Barlow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale. In M. Johnston, S. C. Wright, & J. Weinman (Eds.), Measures in Health Psychology: A User’s Portfolio. Causal and Control Beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-NELSON.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H., & Cupach, W. R. (1984). Interpersonal Communication Competence. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, A. M., Perry, J. L., & Miller, T. K. (2009). Conceptualizing and Measuring Collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 23–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education. (2006). A National Dialogue: The Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education. Washington, DC. Retrieved April 21, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valve Corporation. (2007). Team Fortress 2. Valve Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. (1980). Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J., & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zauszniewski, J. A., Lai, C.-Y., & Tithiphontumrong, S. (2006). Development and Testing of the Resourcefulness Scale for Older Adults. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 14(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1891/jnum.14.1.57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Computing Science Education, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

    Matthew Barr

Authors
  1. Matthew Barr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Barr .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barr, M. (2019). Graduate Attributes and Games. In: Graduate Skills and Game-Based Learning. Digital Education and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27786-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27786-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27785-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27786-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation