Abstract
The reduction of CO2 emissions requires the combination of measures that prevent the emission of this compound in the electrical and industrial sector. Each region will have different characteristics that should be accentuated to apply the most viable technologies. In this case, a study is carried out in the North of Spain, where a potential CO2 store is located and, in this work, the development of a cluster CCS is studied, which is defined as the region with minimum CO2 emissions. In this case, the connection of different industrial nodes with the storage is studied, and a cluster CCS definition methodology is proposed. Those nodes that are economically and/or environmentally unviable in connection with the geological storage may apply other technologies for direct or indirect use of CO2.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Koytsoumpa EI, Bergins C, Kakaras E (2018) The CO2 economy: review of CO2 capture and reuse technologies. J Supercrit Fluids 132:3–16
IPCC (2005) In: Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L (eds) Carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, pp 431
European Parliament: Directive 2003/87/CE establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC. Brussels, 2003
Llamas B, Hernández A, Mazadiego LF (2016a) Economic modeling of the CO2 transportation phase and its application to the Duero Basin, Spain. Greenhouse Gas Sci Technol 00:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg
Rubin ES, Davison JE, Herzog HJ (2015) The cost of CO2 capture and storage. Int J Greenhouse Control 40:378–400
Kanniche M, Gros-Bonnivard R, Jaud P et al (2010) Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO2 capture. Appl Therm Eng 30:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2009.05.005
Scholes CA, Smith KH, Kentish SE, Stevens GW (2010) CO2 capture from pre-combustion processes—strategies for membrane gas separation. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4:739–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJGGC.2010.04.001
Hu Y, Yan J (2012) Characterization of flue gas in oxy-coal combustion processes for CO2 capture. Appl Energy 90:113–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.03.005
Kohl AL, Nielsen R (1997) Alkanolamines for hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide removal in gas purification, 5th edn. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, pp 40–186
Llamas B, Navarrete B, Vega F, Rodríguez E, Mazadiego LF, Cámara Á, Otero P (2016b) Greenhouse gas emissions – carbon capture, storage and utilisation. Intechopen, Croatia, pp 81–114
Onyebuchi VE, Kolios A, Hanak DP, Biliyok C, Manovic V (2018) A systematic review of key challenges of CO2 transport via pipelines. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:2563–2583
Jensen MD, Schlasner SM, Sorensen JA, Hamling JA (2014) Operational flexibility of CO2 transport and storage. Energy Procedia 63:2715–2722
Johnson JW, Nitao JJ, Knauss KG (2004) Reactive transport modelling of CO2 storage in saline aquifers to elucidate fundamental processes, trapping mechanisms and sequestration partitioning. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 233(1):107–128
Benson SM (2005) In: Thomas DC, Benson SM (eds) Overview of geologic storage of CO2 in carbon dioxide capture for storage in deep geologic formations, vol 2. Elsevier
Bocin-Dumitriu A, Perez M, Sveen T, Bocin-Dumitriu A (2013) Carbon capture and utilisation workshop: background and proceedings
Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum: TECHNICAL GROUP Phase I Final Report by the CSLF Task Force on CO2 Utilization Options Background, 2012
Cuéllar-Franca RM, Azapagic A (2015) Carbon capture, storage and utilisation technologies: a critical analysis and comparison of their life cycle environmental impacts. J CO2 Util 9:82–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2014.12.001
European Parliament: Directive 2009/31/EC on the geological storage of carbon dioxide and amending Council Directive 85/337/EEC, European Parliament and Council Directives 2000/60/EC, 2001/80/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2006/12/EC, 2008/1/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006. Brussels, 2009
Llamas B, Cienfuegos P (2012) Multicriteria decision methodology to select suitable areas for storing CO2. Energy Environ 23:2–3
Instituto Geológico y Minero de España. http://info.igme.es/geologiasubsuelo/AlmacenamientoCO2/Algeco2.aspx. Access on 20th Apr 2019
Llamas B, Camara A (2014) Application of multicriteria algorithm to select suitable areas for storing CO2: CO2SiteAssess software. Energy Procedia 63:4977–4986
European Parliament: Directive 2018/410 amending Directive 2003/87/EC to enhance cost-effective emission reductions and low-carbon investments, and Decision (EU) 2015/1814. Brussels, 2018
Environment Agency Scoping guidelines on the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of projects: scoping the environmental impacts of windfarms (on-shore and off-shore)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Llamas, B., Ortega, M.F., García, M.J., Mora, P. (2020). Carbon Storage and Utilization as a Local Response to Use Fossil Fuels in a Sustainable Manner. In: Stagner, J., Ting, DK. (eds) Sustaining Resources for Tomorrow. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27676-8_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27676-8_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-27675-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-27676-8
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)