Skip to main content

The Changing Landscape and Dynamics of Turkey’s Political Economy in the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Turkey’s Political Economy in the 21st Century

Part of the book series: International Political Economy Series ((IPES))

Abstract

Turkey’s political economy in the 2000s has shown a remarkable diversification in its international political economy landscape, its domestic political economy framework, instrumental alternatives and geographic outreach, despite intensifying internal and external challenges. The overall framework of this book seeks to make a comprehensive analysis of Turkey’s political economy in the twenty-first century and to grasp how it has diversified in the domestic, instrumental and geographic domains. To this end, this introductory chapter will first rethink Turkey’s political economy with an eye to explaining Turkey’s economic growth and political transformation in line with the changes occurring in world economics from the Washington Consensus era to the current “mix” or “hybrid” era encompassing both the characteristics of post-Washington and Beijing Consensus era. In sum, the overarching aim of this book project is twofold: to scrutinize the transformation experienced in Turkey’s political economy in the 2000s and to link this transformation with the changing preferences in Turkish foreign policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Washington Consensus developed in the 1980s and 1990s underlined three core principles—trade liberalization, privatization and deregulation—that needed to be implemented by the developing world to push economic growth.

References

  • Arestis, P., & Saad-Filho, A. (Eds.). (2007). Political Economy of Brazil: Recent Economic Performance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G., & Zhang, L. (2011). Beyond the Washington Consensus: A New Bandung? In J. Shefner & P. Fernández-Kelly (Eds.), Globalization and Beyond: New Examinations of Global Power and Its Alternatives (pp. 25–57). University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank, A., & Karadag, R. (2012). The Political Economy of Regional Power: Turkey Under the AKP (GIGA Working Papers No. 204).

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, S. (2013). China and the Global Political Economy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, L., & Kassum, J. (2014). The Political Economy of an Emerging Global Power: In Search of the Brazil Dream. IPE Series. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falola, T., & Achberger, J. (2013). The Political Economy of Development and Underdevelopment in Africa. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., Shakland, A., & Chenoy, A. (2016). The BRICS in International Development. IPE Series. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güven, A. B. (2008). Post-Washington Consensus in Action: Lessons from Turkey, Draft Version. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association of Political Science University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, June 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Güven, A. B. (2016). The Political Economy of Turkish Democracy. In C. Erişen & P. Kubicek (Eds.), Democratic Consolidation in Turkey (pp. 184–203). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibben, M. (2016). Poor States, Power and the Politics of IMF Reform Drivers of Change in the Post-Washington Consensus. IPE Series. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kar, S., & Sen, K. (2016). The Political Economy of India’s Growth Episodes. SPREI. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirişçi, K. (2009). The Transformation of Turkish Foreign Policy: The Rise of the Trading State. New Perspectives on Turkey, 40, 29–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutlay, M. (2015). Turkish Economy at a Crossroads: Unpacking Turkey’s Current Account Challenge. Global Turkey in Europe III: Democracy, Trade, and the Kurdish Question in Turkey-EU Relations, 19, 219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J., & Wang, L. (2014). China’s Economic Dynamics a Beijing Consensus in the making? New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Y. M. (2017). Dancing with the Devil the Political Economy of Privatization in China. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagaraj, R., & Moritam, S. (2017). Political Economy of Contemporary India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlar Dal, E. (2014). On Turkey’s Trail as a “Rising Middle Power” in the Network of Global Governance: Preferences, Capabilities, and Strategies. Perception, 19(4), 107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlar Dal, E., & Gök, G. O. (2014). Locating Turkey as a ‘RisingPower’ in the Changing International Order: An Introduction. Perceptions, 19(4), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandal, N. A. (2014). Middle Powerhood as a Legitimation Strategy in the Developing World: The Cases of Brazil and Turkey. International Politics, 51(6), 693–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra, N., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2008). The Washington Consensus Reconsider Towards a New Global Governance. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekin, B. Ç., & Tekin, B. R. (2015). The Limits, Dilemmas and Paradoxes of Turkish Foreign Policy: A Political Economy Perspective. London: LSEE-Research on South Eastern Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyvat, C. (2018). The End of Boom and the Political Economy of Turkey’s Crisis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oniş, Z. (1991). The Logic of the Developmental State. Comparative Politics, 24(1), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öniş, Z. (2010). Crises and Transformations in Turkish Political Economy. Turkish Policy Quarterly, 9(3), 45–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagci, M. (2016). A Beijing Consensus in the Making: The Rise of Chinese Initiatives in the International Political Economy and Implications for Developing Countries. Perceptions, 21(2), 29–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagci, M. (2017). The Political Economy of AK Party Rule in Turkey: From a Regulatory to a Developmental State? Insight Turkey, 19(2), 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D. L. (2012). The Global Recession and China’s Political Economy. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Samiratou Dipama, Nilay Tuysuz, Ahmet Tuzgen and Hakan Mehmetcik for their technical help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Parlar Dal, E. (2020). The Changing Landscape and Dynamics of Turkey’s Political Economy in the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction. In: Parlar Dal, E. (eds) Turkey’s Political Economy in the 21st Century. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27632-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics