Skip to main content

Foundations of Mathematics: From Hilbert and Wittgenstein to the Categorical Unity of Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
WITTGENSTEINIAN (adj.)

Part of the book series: The Frontiers Collection ((FRONTCOLL))

Abstract

Wittgenstein’s philosophy of mathematics is often devalued due to its peculiar features, especially its radical departure from any of standard positions in foundations of mathematics, such as logicism, intuitionism, and formalism. We first contrast Wittgenstein’s finitism with Hilbert’s finitism, arguing that Wittgenstein’s is perspicuous or surveyable finitism whereas Hilbert’s is transcendental finitism. We then further elucidate Wittgenstein’s philosophy by explicating his natural history view of logic and mathematics, which is tightly linked with the so-called rule-following problem and Kripkenstein’s paradox, yielding vital implications to the nature of mathematical understanding, and to the nature of the certainty and objectivity of mathematical truth. Since the incompleteness theorems, foundations of mathematics have mostly lost their philosophical driving force, and anti-foundationalism has become prevalent and pervasive. Yet new foundations have nevertheless emerged and come into the scene, namely categorical foundations. We articulate the foundational significance of category theory by explicating three forms of foundations, i.e., global foundations (aka. reductive absolute foundations), local foundations (aka. structural relative foundations), and conceptual foundations. And we explore the possibility of categorical unified science qua pluralistic unified science, arguing for the categorical unity of science on both mathematical and philosophical grounds. We then turn to an issue in conceptual foundations of mathematics, namely the nature of the concept of space. We elucidate Wittgenstein’s intensional conception of space in relation to Brouwer’s theory of space continua and to the modern conception of space as point-free structure in category theory and algebraic geometry. We finally give a bird’s-eye view of mathematical philosophy from a Wittgensteinian perspective, and further sheds new light on Wittgenstein’s constructive structuralism and his view of incompleteness and contradictions in mathematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baird, David, et al. (eds.), 1998, Heinrich Hertz: Classical Physicist, Modern Philosopher, Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourbaki, Nicole, 1950, “The Architecture of Mathematics", The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 4, pp. 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, L.E.J., 1918, “Begründung der Mengenlehre unabhängig vom logischen Satz vom ausgeschlossenen Dritten. Erster Teil, Allgemeine Mengenlehre", KNAW Verhandelingen 5, pp.1-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartier, Pierre, 2001, “A Mad Day’s Work: From Grothendieck to Connes and Kontsevich: The Evolution of Concepts of Space and Symmetry", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 38, pp. 389–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connes, Alain, 1994, Noncommutative Geometry, San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coquand, Thierry, 2009, Space of valuations, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 157, pp. 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corry, Leo, 2004, David Hilbert and the Axiomatization of Physics (1898-1918), Netherlands: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison, 2007, Objectivity, NewYork: Zone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, Ryan, 2015, Leaving Mathematics As It Is: Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy of Mathematics, Norwich: University of East Anglia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, Michael, 1977, Elements of Intuitionism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, Peter, 1999, “Trading Zone: Coordinating Action and Belief", in: Science Studies Reader, pp. 137–160, NewYork: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison, Peter, 1997, Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics, Chicago: Univesity of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Jeremy, 2008, Plato’s Ghost: The Modernist Transformation of Mathematics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Han, Daesuk, 2011, “Wittgenstein and the Real Numbers", History and Philosophy of Logic 31, pp. 219–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, David, 1983, “On the Infinite", in: Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul, 1982, Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawvere, William, 1964, “An elementary theory of the category of sets", Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the U.S.A., vol. 52, pp. 1506–1511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLane, Saunders, and Ieke Moerdijk, 1992, Sheaves in Geometry and Logic, New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion, Matthieu, 2011, Wittgenstein on surveyability of proofs, in: Marie McGinn and Oskari Kuusela (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin-Löf, Per, 1984, Intuitionistic type theory, Napoli: Bibliopolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishida, Kitaro, 1990 (original publication in 1921), An Inquiry into the Good, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, Charles Sanders, 1974, Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary, 1983, Realism and Reason, Philosophical Papers vol. 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodych, Victor, 2011, “Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Mathematics", Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanker, Stuart, 1987, Wittgenstein and the Turning Point in the Philosophy of Mathematics, New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Atten, Mark, 2007, Brouwer meets Husserl: on the phenomenology of choice sequences, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voevodsky, Vladimir, et al., 2013, Homotopy Type Theory: Univalent Foundations of Mathematics, Princeton: IAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waismann, Friedrich, 1979, “ Ludwig Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle", Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, Peter, 2010, “A short history of knowledge formations", in: The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, pp. 3–14, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1974, Philosophical Grammar, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1975, Philosophical Remarks, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1978, Remarks on the Foundations of Mathematics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1986, Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Samson Abramsky for discussions about the unity of science, to Makoto Kikuchi for discussions about Wittgenstein’s philosophy of logic and mathematics, and to Norihiro Yamada for discussions about logic and foundations of mathematics. I hereby acknowledge financial support from JSPS (grant number: 17K14231) and JST (grant number: JPMJPR17G9).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshihiro Maruyama .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Maruyama, Y. (2020). Foundations of Mathematics: From Hilbert and Wittgenstein to the Categorical Unity of Science. In: Wuppuluri, S., da Costa, N. (eds) WITTGENSTEINIAN (adj.). The Frontiers Collection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27569-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics