Advertisement

Virtual-Sensor-Based Planetary Soil Classification with Legged Robots

  • Shuang WuEmail author
  • Lei Chen
  • Bin Liu
  • Chu Wang
  • Qingqing Wei
  • Yaobing Wang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11743)

Abstract

The estimation of soil properties is crucial for legged robots during planetary exploration missions. A virtual-sensor-based soil classification approach for legged robots is proposed in this paper. Instead of installing extra force sensors on the foot of the robot, joint motion information from joint position sensors and current signals from joint motors on the leg are recorded and used as the dataset in classification. The collected data is decomposed using the Discrete Wavelet Transform and assigned a soil type by a Support Vector Machine (SVM). This approach is validated on a dataset acquired from a high-fidelity simulation model of a hexapod robot, and the classification accuracy of more than 90% was achieved. Different SVM models are used in classification for comparative analysis, and the contributions of the different signals to the classification performance are evaluated. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach can estimate the soil properties with a good performance and rapid forecasting speed.

Keywords

Soil classification Virtual sensor Legged robots 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51875393) and by the China Advance Research for Manned Space Project (No. 030601).

References

  1. 1.
    Janosi, Z., Hanamoto, B.: Analytical determination of drawbar pull as a function of slip for tracked vehicles in deformable soils: mechanics of soil-vehicle systems: Edizoni Minerva Technica. Editione Minerva Tecnica, Torino (1962)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wong, J.Y., Reece, A.R.: Prediction of rigid wheel performance based on the analysis of soil-wheel stresses part I. Performance of driven rigid wheels. J. Terramech. 4(1), 81–98 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Komizunai, S., Konno, S., Abiko, A., et al.: Slip characteristics identification for biped walking of a humanoid robot on sand. In: Proceedings of Eighth International Conference on Flow Dynamics, pp. 9–11 (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brunskill, C., Patel, N., Gouache, T.P., et al.: Characterisation of martian soil simulants for the ExoMars rover testbed. J. Terrramech. 48(6), 419–438 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ding, L., Gao, H., Deng, Z., et al.: Foot–terrain interaction mechanics for legged robots: modeling and experimental validation. Int. J. Robot. Res. 32(13), 1585–1606 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mrva, J., Faigl, J.: Feature extraction for terrain classification with crawling robots. Inf. Technol. Appl. Theory 1422, 179–185 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Degrave, J., Van Cauwenbergh, R., Wyffels, F., et al.: Terrain classification for a quadruped robot. In: 12th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, vol. 1, pp. 185–190. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kertész, C.: Rigidity-based surface recognition for a domestic legged robot. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 1(1), 309–315 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brooks, C.A., Iagnemma, K.: Self-supervised terrain classification for planetary surface exploration rovers. J. Field Robot. 29(3), 445–468 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Walas, K.: Terrain classification and negotiation with a walking robot. J. Intell. Rob. Syst. 78(3–4), 401–423 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kolvenbach, H., Bärtschi, C., Wellhausen, L., et al.: Haptic inspection of planetary soils with legged robots. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 4(2), 1626–1632 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ablameyko, S., Goras, L., Gori, M., Piuri, V.: Neural Networks for Instrumentation Measurement and Related Industrial Applications, vol. 185. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gonzalez de Santos, P., Garcia, E., Estremera, J.: Virtual sensors for walking robots. In: Gonzalez de Santos, P., Garcia, E., Estremera, J. (eds.) Quadrupedal Locomotion: An Introduction to the Control of Four-legged Robots, pp. 191–211. Springer, London (2006).  https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-307-8_8CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Masson, M.H., Canu, S., Grandvalet, Y., et al.: Software sensor design based on empirical data. Ecol. Model. 120(2–3), 131–139 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tzanetakis, G., Essl, G., Cook, P.: Audio analysis using the discrete wavelet transform. In: Proceedings of Conference in Acoustics and Music Theory Applications, vol. 66 (2001)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jaber, A.A., Bicker, R.: Industrial robot backlash fault diagnosis based on discrete wavelet transform and artificial neural network. Am. J. Mech. Eng. 4(1), 21–31 (2016)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jakovljevic, Z., Petrovic, P.B., Mikovic, V.D., et al.: Fuzzy inference mechanism for recognition of contact states in intelligent robotic assembly. J. Intell. Manuf. 25(3), 571–587 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vapnik, V.N.: Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, New York (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chi, M., Feng, R., Bruzzone, L.: Classification of hyperspectral remote-sensing data with primal SVM for small-sized training dataset problem. Adv. Space Res. 41(11), 1793–1799 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Su, J., Yi, D., Liu, C., et al.: Dimension reduction aided hyperspectral image classification with a small-sized training dataset: experimental comparisons. Sensors 17(12), 2726 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li, C., Wang, J., Wang, L., et al.: Comparison of classification algorithms and training sample sizes in urban land classification with Landsat thematic mapper imagery. Remote Sens. 6(2), 964–983 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shuang Wu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lei Chen
    • 1
  • Bin Liu
    • 1
  • Chu Wang
    • 1
  • Qingqing Wei
    • 1
  • Yaobing Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Beijing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Space Robotic System Technology and ApplicationsBeijing Institute of Spacecraft System EngineeringBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations