Co-simulation of Omnidirectional Mobile Platform Based on Fuzzy Control

  • Wenchao Zuo
  • Hongbin MaEmail author
  • Xin Wang
  • Cong Han
  • Zhuang Li
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11741)


Slippage is inevitable when the mecanum wheel moves in a non-ideal environment which likes an uneven ground. Slippage is an important factor affecting the motion accuracy of the mecanum wheel. A novel six-input and five-output fuzzy controller is proposed to improve the motion accuracy of the mecanum wheel mobile platform (MWMP) in this paper. Firstly, the assembly model of the MWMP is designed by Solidworks software. The virtual prototype model can be obtained by Automatic Dynamic Analysis of Mechanical Systems (Adams) performing some parameter settings on the assembly model. Deviation data can be obtained easily and intuitively through ADAMS when the MWMP is moving. Co-simulation between Matlab and Adams is achieved through interface functions between them. Then, an ideal kinematics model is established in the global coordinate system. Finally, the thirteen fuzzy rules are designed based on the ten basic forms of motion of the MWMP. A fuzzy logic system (FLS) with adaptive function is established in Simulink. The experimental results indicate that the FLS can improve the robustness, adaptability and accuracy of the MWMP.


FLS Kinematics Co-simulation MWMP 



This work is partially supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant 2017YFF0205306, National Nature Science Foundation of China under Grant 91648117, and Beijing Natural Science Foundation under Grant 4172055.


  1. 1.
    Hu, M., Chen, J., Shi, C.: Three-dimensional mapping based on SIFT and RANSAC for mobile robot. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Technology in Automation, Control, and Intelligent Systems (CYBER), pp. 139–144. IEEE (2015)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alakshendra, V., Chiddarwar, S.S.: A robust adaptive control of Mecanum wheel mobile robot: simulation and experimental validation. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 5606–5611. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Xie, L., Herberger, W., Xu, W., Stol, K.A.: Experimental validation of energy consumption model for the four-wheeled omnidirectional Mecanum robots for energy-optimal motion control. In: 2016 IEEE 14th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control (AMC), pp. 565–572. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gfrerrer, A.: Geometry and kinematics of the Mecanum wheel. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 25(9), 784–791 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tlale, N., de Villiers, M.: Kinematics and dynamics modelling of a Mecanum wheeled mobile platform. In: 2008 15th International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice, pp. 657–662. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fuad, A., et al.: Modeling and simulation for heavy-duty Mecanum wheel platform using model predictive control. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 184, p. 012050. IOP Publishing (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuo, C.-H., et al.: Trajectory and heading tracking of a Mecanum wheeled robot using fuzzy logic control. In: 2016 International Conference on Instrumentation, Control and Automation (ICA), pp. 54–59. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tsai, C.-C., Wu, H.-L., Tai, F.-C.: Intelligent sliding-mode formation control for uncertain networked heterogeneous Mecanum-wheeled omnidirectional platforms. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), pp. 000539–000544. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wen, R., Tong, M.: Mecanum wheels with Astar algorithm and fuzzy PID algorithm based on genetic algorithm. In: 2017 International Conference on Robotics and Automation Sciences (ICRAS), pp. 114–118. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vlantis, P., Bechlioulis, C.P., Karras, G., Fourlas, G., Kyriakopoulos, K.J.: Fault tolerant control for omni-directional mobile platforms with 4 Mecanum wheels. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 2395–2400. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu, X., Zhang, X., Zhang, G., Jia, S.: Design of adaptive sliding mode controller for four-Mecanum wheel mobile robot. In: 2018 37th Chinese Control Conference (CCC), pp. 3983–3987. IEEE (2018)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jamali, P., Tabatabaei, S.M., Sohrabi, O., Seifipour, N.: Software based modeling, simulation and fuzzy control of a Mecanum wheeled mobile robot. In: 2013 First RSI/ISM International Conference on Robotics and Mechatronics (ICRoM), pp. 200–204. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shahin, S., Sadeghian, R., Sedigh, P., Masouleh, M.T.: Simulation, control and construction of a four Mecanum-wheeled robot. In: 2017 IEEE 4th International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation (KBEI), pp. 0315–0319. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ahmad Jamil, A.-F., Omar, R., Yaacob, S., Mokhtar, M.: Development of fuzzy PID controller for Mecanum wheel robot. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 12, 14478–14483 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Adamov, B.I.: A study of the controlled motion of a four-wheeled Mecanum platform. Nelin. Dinam. 14(2), 265–290 (2018) MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenchao Zuo
    • 1
  • Hongbin Ma
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xin Wang
    • 1
  • Cong Han
    • 1
  • Zhuang Li
    • 1
  1. 1.School of AutomationBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations