Skip to main content

Organic Flour in France

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability of European Food Quality Schemes

Abstract

In this chapter, the sustainability of organic products (soft wheat, flour and bread) is compared to that of conventional products in France. The organic supply chain is separated into four levels. Farmers (7328) produce 90,300 tons of soft wheat per year for the milling industry. Forty-eight cooperatives collect half of the grains produced. Millers (93 mills) produce 110,000 tons of flour (from both national wheat production and imports of wheat), which is then used in industrial or traditional bakery (3049 and 1948 employees respectively) to produce bread. The production of organic soft wheat represents 0.26% of the soft wheat production in France. Supply of French organic soft wheat falls short of demand and imports bridge the gap. A major challenge faced by the organic chain is the much lower yields of soft wheat compared to conventional farming. Both these challenges impact the sustainability of the organic supply chain. The results show that the organic chain is globally more sustainable than its reference with regards the economic, social and environmental aspects investigated here. Indeed, results indicate that the organic chain is more profitable at all levels of the value chain and creates more jobs at both farm and processing levels. The organic flour and bread have a lower carbon footprint and travel shorter distances than their reference. Their water footprint is also better on a per hectare basis although the higher yields of conventional wheat reverse this result on a per ton basis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Yields for 2016/2017 were particularly low as there has been a long period of drought in the country. Over the last years, the average soft wheat production is about 37 million tons (Passion Céréales 2017).

  2. 2.

    Updated figures for 2018 indicate about 100 thousand tons of organic soft wheat produced in France, and about 180–200 thousand tons of organic soft wheat milled, namely 80–100 thousand tons of imported soft wheat (i.e. 40–50% of the total organic grain volumes) (Pelletier 2019). These values point a rise in the demand for organic flour based products greater to the rise in the organic soft wheat volumes produced.

  3. 3.

    Although only 2 years, from the beginning of the conversion and the sowing date, are needed to convert from conventional to organic wheat production.

  4. 4.

    In France, since 2017, maintenance payments are no more funded by the EU but can be founded by regions, on a voluntary basis.

  5. 5.

    According to the collective agreement of the bread making industry, bakeries that produce less than 5400 quintals of bread yearly, have fewer than 50 employees and rely mainly on direct sale to final consumers are considered as traditional or artisanal. To the contrary, bakeries that produce more than 5400 quintals of bread yearly, have more than 20 employees and a baking area larger than 30 sqm, earn less than 30% of their turnover with retail sale of bread, and produce and sell unfinished products, such as partially baked or pre-baked bakery wares are considered as industrial.

References

  • Agence Bio. (2008). Du Contrôle à la Certification, la bio: des garanties à tous les stades des filières. Lettre d'Information N°10 Automne 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agence Bio. (2013). L’agriculture biologique – Ses acteurs, ses produits, ses territoires. Chiffres clés. Edition 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agence Bio. (2016). La Bio en France, des producteurs aux consommateurs. Les carnets de l’Agence Bio. Second edition 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agence Bio. (2017). Printemps bio 2017: l’agriculture biologique confirme son développement en France: une bonne nouvelle pour l’emploi. Dossier de presse. Agence Bio, p.12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agence Bio. (2018). Les organismes certificateurs. Accessed on 21 Feb 2019 at http://www.agencebio.org/les-organismes-certificateurs

  • Agreste. (2013). Statistique Agricole Annuelle, résultats 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agreste. (2014). Statistique Agricole Annuelle, résultats 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agreste. (2015). Agreste Conjoncture: Grandes Cultures et Fourrages. In: Agreste infos rapides – Grandes Cultures et Fourrages n°6/10.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANMF. (2016). Fiche Statistiques 2015, données provisoires juin 2016. Association Nationale de la Meunerie Française. Juin 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANMF. (2017). Fiche Statistiques 2016, données provisoires juillet 2017. Association Nationale de la Meunerie Française. Juillet 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellassen, V., Giraud, G., Hilal, M., Arfini, F., Barczak, A., Bodini, A., Brennan, M., Drut, M., Duboys de Labarre, M., Gorton, M., Hartmann, M., Majewski, E., Muller, P., Monier-Dilhan, S., Poméon, T., Tocco, B., Tregear, A., Veneziani, M., Vergote, M.-H., Vitterso, G., Wavresky, P., & Wilkinson, A. (2016). Strength2Food project, deliverable 3.2: Methods and indicators for measuring the social, environmental and economic impacts of food quality schemes. Dijon: INRA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Divo, C. (2018). Personal communication. Chambre d’Agriculture de Côte d’Or.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecocert. (2015). Ecocert Organic Standard v04.01. Edition 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espinoza-Orias, N., Stichnothe, H., & Azapagic, A. (2011). The carbon footprint of bread. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 16, 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-011-0271-0.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ethevenot, F. (2017). Personal communication. Dijon Céréales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat. (2018). Agricultural production – crops. Statistics explained.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2016). FAOSTAT. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • France Agrimer. (2016). Données et bilans: Variétés et rendements biologiques, récolte 2015. Octobre 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisterling, K., Samaras, C., & Schweizer, V. (2009). Decisions to reduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and product transport: LCA case study of organic and conventional wheat. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17, 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Natura-Sciences. (2018). La France est auto-suffisante en certains produits bio! Accessed on 21 Feb 2019 at http://www.natura-sciences.com/agriculture/importations-bio575.html

  • OPM. (2017). Tableau de bord 2016 – Boulangerie-pâtisserie artisanale. Observatoire prospectif des métiers et des qualifications dans les métiers de l’alimentation. Janvier 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passion Céréales. (2017). Des chiffres et des céréales. Edition 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, J.-B. (2017). Personal communication. Moulin Marion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, J.-B. (2018). Personal communication. Moulin Marion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelletier, J.-B. (2019). Personal communication. Moulin Marion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, P. (2017). Personal communication. Chambre d’Agriculture de Côte d’Or.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tray, T. (2014). Adapted from FAO, 2012. Global wheat outlook, presentation from the context network, USA. Accessed on 21 Feb 2019 at https://www.slideshare.net/CIMMYT/global-wheat-outlook

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank all the people who contributed in any way to the development of this report. All the indicator coordinators, Sylvette Monier, Valentin Bellassen, Marion Drut, Antonio Bodini, Mohamed Hilal, Paul Muller and Mario Veneziani, for their work, their availability and their valuable advices.

All the professionals of the supply chain who helped us, for their time and their sympathy. Thank you, in particular, to Julien-Boris Pelletier from Moulin Marion, Raphaël Houlon from Moulin Suire, Loïc Viguier from Moulin Decollogne, Bérangère Mignot from Moulin Nicot, Florence Ethevenot from Dijon Céréales, Clément Divo and Pierre Robin from Chambre d’agriculture de Côte d’Or, Stéphane Grippon and Hélène Levieil from Bio Bourgogne, Laurence Mallet from DRAAF Dijon, Armelle Jaboeuf from France AgriMer, the bakery l’Instant Gourmand, Dijon and Les Champs du Destin, Sacquenay.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marion Drut .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Juge, C. et al. (2019). Organic Flour in France. In: Arfini, F., Bellassen, V. (eds) Sustainability of European Food Quality Schemes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27508-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics